Return to Transcripts main page

Legal View with Ashleigh Banfield

Netanyahu Addresses UN General Assembly

Aired September 29, 2014 - 12:30   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

ASHLEIGH BANFIELD, CNN ANCHOR: By a three-to-one margin, another aspect of President Obama's strategy is not perhaps quite as popular. Check out these brand-new CNN poll numbers.

Seventy-three percent back the air strikes so long as other nations are taking part, but a majority actually opposes to U.S. military aid to so-called moderate Syrian rebels. About four out of ten approve such measures.

And generally Americans are, quote, "confident" that the United States will meet the president's goal of, quote, "degrading and eventually destroying" the ISIS menace. A minority, 38 percent, not quite as confident about that.

In his "60 Minutes" interview, President Obama said there is a reason that America takes on the toughest fights and the steepest challenges.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT THE UNITED STATED: America leads. We are the indispensable nation. We have capacity that no one else has. Our military is the best in the history of the world. And when trouble comes up anywhere in the world, they don't call Beijing; they don't call Moscow. They call us.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BANFIELD: Joining me here in New York to talk about all of this, CNN military analyst and retired air force Lieutenant Colonel Rick Francona and former U.S. Army Delta Force commander, Colonel James Reese. Thank you to both of you.

First and foremost, you know, air strikes came in this weekend. The position that we were just looking at -- you know, Arwa, she's had to run because mortars were falling.

Let me interrupt that thought for just a moment, because Benjamin Netanyahu is addressing the United Nations General Assembly and I want to make sure that we can listen to some of his address as he gets ready.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Microphone, please.

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER: Thank you, Mr. President. Distinguished delegates, I come here from Jerusalem to speak on behalf of my people, the people of Israel. I've come here to speak about the dangers we face and about the opportunities we seek. I've come here to expose the brazen lies spoken from this very podium against my country and against the brave soldiers who defend it.

Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel pray for peace. But our hopes and the world's hopes for peace are in danger because, everywhere we look, militant Islam is on the march.

It's not militants. It's not Islam. It's militant Islam, and typically its first victims are other Muslims but it's fair to no one, Christians, Jews, the Yazidis, Kurds, no creed, no faith, no ethnic group is beyond its sights and it's rapidly spreading in every part of the world.

You know the famous America saying, all politics is local? For the militant Islamist, all politics is global, because their ultimate goal is to dominate the world. Now that threat might seem exaggerated to some since it starts out small, like a cancer that attacks a particular part of the body, but, left unchecked, it grows, metastasizing over wider and wider areas. To protect the peace and security of the world, we must remove this cancer before it's too late.

Last week, many of the countries represented here rightly applauded President Obama for leading the effort to confront is, and yet weeks before, the same countries opposed Israel for confronting Hamas.

They evidently don't understand that ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree. ISIS and Hamas share a fanatical creed which they both seek to impose well beyond the territory under their control.

Listen to ISIS's self-declared caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. This is what he said two months ago. "A day will soon come when the Muslim will walk everywhere as a master, the Muslim who cause the world to hear and understand the meaning of terrorism and destroy the idol of democracy."

Now listen to Khaled Mashal, the leader of Hamas. He proclaim a similar vision of the future. "We say this to the West. By Allah, you will be defeated. Tomorrow, our nation will sit on the thrown of the world."

As Hamas' charter makes clear, Hamas' immediate goal is to destroy Israel, but Hamas has a broader objective. They also want a caliphate. Hamas shares the global ambitions of its fellow militant Islamists, and that's why its supporters wildly cheered in the streets of Gaza as thousands of Americans were murdered in 9/11 and that's why its leaders condemned the United States for killing Osama bin Laden, whom they praised as a holy warrior.

So when it comes to their ultimate goals, Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas. And what they share in common, all militant Islamists share in common, Boko Haram in Nigeria, al Shabaab in Somalia, Hezbollah in Lebanon, al Nusra in Syria, the Mahdi Army in Iraq, and the al-Qaeda branches in Yemen, Libya, the Philippines, India, and elsewhere.

Some are radical Sunnis; some are radical Shiites. Some want to restore a pre-medieval caliphate from the seventh century; others want to trigger the apocalyptic return of an imam from the ninth century. They operate in different lands, they target different victims, and they even kill each other in their battle for supremacy.

But they all share a fanatic ideology. They all seek to create ever expanding enclaves of militant Islam where there is no freedom and no tolerance, where women are treated as chattel, Christians are decimated, and minorities are subjugated, sometimes given the stark choice, convert or die.

For them, anyone can be considered an infidel, including fellow Muslims.

Ladies and gentlemen, militant Islam's ambition to dominate the world seems mad, but so, too, did the global ambitions of another fanatic ideology that swept into power eight decades ago.

The Nazis believed in a master race. The militant Islamists believe in a master faith. They just disagree who among them will be the master of the master faith. That's what they truly disagree about.

And therefore, the question before us is whether militant Islam will have the power to realize its unbridled ambitions.

There is one place where that could soon happen, the Islamic state of Iran. For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission way was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words, "We will export our revolution to the entire world until the cry there is no god but Allah will echo throughout the world over."

And ever since, the regime's brutal enforcers, Iran's Revolutionary Guards have done exactly that. Listen to its current commander, General Mohammed Ali Jafari, and he clearly stated this goal. He said, "Our imam did not limit the Islamic revolution to this country. Our duty is to prepare the way for an Islamic world government."

Iran's president, Rouhani, stood here last week and shed crocodile tears over what he called the globalization of terrorism. Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran's global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries, on five continents since 2011 alone.

You know, to say that Iran doesn't practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees. This is -- this bemoaning by the Iranian president of the spread of terrorism has got to be one of history's greatest displays of doubletalk.

Now, some argue that Iran's global terror campaign, its version of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists.

They say things are changing. They point to last year's election in Iran. They claim that, Iran's smooth-talking president and foreign minister, they've changed not only the tone of Iran's foreign policy but also its substance.

They believe Rouhani and Zarif generally want to reconcile with the West, that they've abandoned the global mission of the Islamic revolution.

Really? So, let's look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago. "We have a fundamental problem with the West and especially with America. This is because we are heirs to a global mission which is tied to our raison d'etre." "A global mission which is tied to our very reason for being."

And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one. He says, "How comma Malaysia," he's referring to an overwhelming Muslim country, "how comma Malaysia doesn't have similar problems?"

And he answers, "Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order."

That's your moderate.

So don't be fooled by Iran's manipulative charm offensive. It's designed for one purpose and for one purpose, only, to lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran's path to the bomb.

The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces and leave it with a capacity of thousands of refugees -- of centrifuges, rather -- to enrich uranium. This would effectively cement Iran's place as a threshold military nuclear power. And in the future, at the time of its choosing, Iran, the world's most dangerous regime, in the world's most dangerous region, would obtain the world's most dangerous weapons.

Allowing that to happen would pose the gravest threat to us all. It's one thing to confront militant Islamists on pickup trucks armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It's another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction.

NETANYAHU: I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists. Well, that didn't happen.

And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria's chemical weapons capability. Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons.

Ladies and gentlemen, would you let ISIS enrich uranium? Would you let ISIS build a heavy-water reactor? Would you let ISIS develop inter-continental ballistic missiles. Of course you wouldn't. Then you mustn't let the Islamic state of Iran do those things either, because here's what'll happen.

Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charms and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They'll just vanish. And it's then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world.

There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat. Iran's nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled.

(APPLAUSE)

Make no mistake, ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

(APPLAUSE)

To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war. Ladies and gentlemen, the fight against militant Islam is indivisible. When militant Islam succeeds anywhere, it's emboldened everywhere. When it suffers a blow in one place, it's set back in every place.

That's why Israel's fight against Hamas is not just our fight, it's your fight. Israel is fighting a fanaticism today that your countries may be forced to fight tomorrow.

For 50 days this past summer, Hamas fired thousands of rockets at Israel, many of them supplied by Iran. I want you to think about what your countries would do if thousands of rockets were fired at your cities. Imagine millions of your citizens having seconds at most to scramble to bomb shelters, day after day. You wouldn't let terrorists fire rockets at your cities with impunity, nor would you let terrorists dig dozens of terror tunnels under your borders to infiltrate your towns in order to murder and kidnap your citizens.

NETANYAHU: Israel justly defended itself against both rocket attacks and terror tunnels.

(APPLAUSE)

Yet Israel faced another challenge. We faced a propaganda war. Because in an attempt to win the world's sympathy, Hamas cynically used Palestinian civilians as human shields. It used schools, not just schools, U.N. schools, private homes, mosques, even hospitals to store and fire rockets at Israel.

As Israel surgically struck at the rocket launchers and at the tunnels, Palestinian civilians were tragically, but unintentionally killed. There are heart-wrenching images that resulted, and these fuelled libelous charges that Israel was deliberately targeting civilians.

We were not. We deeply regret every single civilian casualties. And the truth is this. Israel was doing everything to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties. Hamas was doing everything to maximize Israeli civilian casualties and Palestinian civilian casualties.

Israel dropped flyers, made phone calls, sent text messages, broadcast warnings in Arabic on Palestinian television, all this to enable Palestinian civilians to evacuate targeted areas. No other country and no other army in history have gone to greater lengths to avoid casualties among the civilian population of their enemies.

(APPLAUSE)

Now, this -- concern for Palestinian life was all the more remarkable given that Israeli civilians were being bombarded by rockets day after day, night after night. And as their families were being rocketed by Hamas, Israel's citizen army, the brave soldiers of the IDF, our young boys and girls, they upheld the highest moral values of any army in the world.

(APPLAUSE)

Israel's soldiers deserve not condemnation but admiration, admiration from decent people everywhere.

(APPLAUSE)

Now, here's what Hamas did. Here's what Hamas did. Hamas embedded its missile batteries in residential areas and told Palestinians to ignore Israel's warnings to leave. And just in case people didn't get the message, they executed Palestinian civilians in Gaza who dared to protest.

And no less reprehensible, Hamas deliberately placed its rockets where Palestinian children live and play. Let me show you a photograph. It was taken by a France 24 crew during the recent conflict. It shows two Hamas rocket launchers, which were used to attack us. You see three children playing next to them. Hamas deliberately put its rockets in hundreds of residential areas like this, hundreds of them.

NETANYAHU: Ladies and gentlemen, this is a war crime. And I say to President Abbas, these are the crimes, the war crimes, committed by your Hamas partners in the national unity government which you head and you are responsible for. And these are the real war crimes you should have investigated or spoken out against from this podium last week.

(APPLAUSE)

Ladies and gentlemen, as Israel's children huddle in bomb shelters and Israel's Iron Dome missile defense knocked Hamas rockets out of the sky, the profound moral difference between Israel and Hamas couldn't have been clearer. Israel was using its missiles to protect its children. Hamas was using its children to protect its missiles. (APPLAUSE)

By investigating Israel rather than Hamas for war crimes, the U.N. Human Rights Council has betrayed its noble mission to protect the innocent.

In fact, what it's doing is to -- to turn the laws of war upside down. Israel, which took unprecedented steps to minimize civilian casualties, Israel is condemned. Hamas, which both targeted and hid behind civilians, that's a double war crime, Hamas is given a pass.

The Human Rights Council is thus sending a clear message to terrorists everywhere: Use civilians as a human shield. Use them again and again and again. And you know why? Because, sadly, it works.

By granting international legitimacy to the use of human shields, the U.N. Human Rights Council has thus become a terrorist rights council. And it will have repercussions, it probably already has, about the use of civilians as human shields.

It's not just our interests, it's not just our values that are under attack. It's your interests and your values.

Ladies and gentlemen, we live in a world steeped in tyranny and terror, where gays are hanged from cranes in Tehran, political prisoners are executed in Gaza, young girls abducted en masse in Nigeria, and hundreds of thousands are butchered in Syria, Libya, and Iraq.

Yet nearly half, nearly half, of the U.N. Human Rights Council's resolutions focusing on a single country have been directed against Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East. Israel, where issues are openly debated in a boisterous parliament, where human rights are protected by the -- by independent courts and where women, gays and minorities live in a genuinely free society.

The human rights -- the human -- it's an oxymoron, U.N. Human Rights Council, but I'll use it just the same.

The council's biased treatment of Israel is only one manifestation of the return of one of the world's oldest prejudices. We hear mobs today in Europe call for the gassing of Jews. We hear some national leaders compare Israel to the Nazis.

This is not a function of Israel's policies. It's a function of diseased minds. And that disease has a name. It's called anti- Semitism. It is now spreading in polite society, where it masquerades as legitimate criticism of Israel.

NETANYAHU: For centuries, the Jewish people have been demonized with blood libels, and charges of deicide. Today, the Jewish state is demonized with the apartheid libel and charges of genocide. Genocide.

In what moral universe does genocide include warning the enemy's civilian population to get out of harm's way or ensuring that they receive tons, tons of humanitarian aid each day, even as thousands of rockets are being fired at us, or setting up a field hospital to aid their wounded.