Return to Transcripts main page

Wolf

Bipartisan Immigration Bill Roundtable. Aired 1-1:30p ET

Aired January 09, 2018 - 13:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: What happened, Mr. President, I think, is that the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration bill, as you know. We did not consider it in the House, so we didn't reach those issues.

Very frankly, on border security, Mr. McCaul, the Chairman of the committee, reported out a unanimous security solution, which we then included in the bill that we filed on comprehensive immigration reform. So I think we can reach agreement.

TRUMP: Well, I also think that, after we do DACA -- and I really believe we should be able to be successful -- I really think we should look in terms of your permanent solution and to the whole situation with immigration. I think a lot of people in this room would agree to that also, but we'll do it in steps. And most people agree with that, I think, that we'll do the steps. Even you say, 'let's do this, and then we go phase two.'

Kevin, what would you like to say?

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: Well, first, I want to thank you for bringing everybody together. You got the Senate, you got the House, you got both parties. And I like the exchange of ideas, and I think everybody has a point here.

The one thing I don't want to have happen here is what I saw in the past. There were four bills that were passed on border security years ago that never got finished. There were immigration bills passed that -- we're right back at the table with the same problem. Let's make a commitment to each one, and, most importantly, to the American people, that, when we get done and come to an agreement, that we're not back at this problem three, four years from now.

That's why -- yes, we've got to do DACA, and I agree with you 100 percent -- but if we do not do something with the security, if we do not do something with the chain migration, we are fooling each other that we solved the problem. You know how difficult this issue is. So let's collectively -- we're here at the table together. I'll be the first one to tell you, we're all going to have to give a little, and I'll be the first one willing to.

But let's solve the problem -- but let's not tell the American public at the end that it's solved when it's not.

TRUMP: Well, I think a good starting point would be Bob Goodlatte, who has done a bill, and I understand you're ready to submit it. And you're going to take that and you'll submit it and they'll negotiate it in Congress or the House. And then it goes to the Senate, and they'll negotiate -- both Republican and Democrat. But it could be a good way of starting.

Now, if anyone has an idea different from that -- but, I think, starting in the House. Starting in the House -- Mike, you good? You're ready. I think you're ready to go.

REPRESENTATIVE MCCAUL: We are, Mr. President.

TRUMP: I would like to add the words "merit" into any bill that's submitted because I think we should have merit-based immigration like they have in Canada, like they have in Australia. So we have people coming in that have a great track record, as opposed to what we're doing now, to be honest with you.

But I think merit-based should be absolutely added to any bill, even if it has to do with DACA. That would be added to the things I said. I think it would be popular. I can tell you, the American public very much wants that.

But, Bob, where are you with the bill?

REPRESENTATIVE GOODLATTE: So, tomorrow, Chairman McCaul and Congresswoman McSally and Congressman Labrador -- we're the chairmen of the two committees and the chairmen of the two subcommittees -- are going to introduce a bill that addresses the DACA concerns.

And let me thank you, Mr. President, both -- I was an immigration lawyer before I was elected to Congress. I want to thank you both for campaigning on securing our borders and the interior of our country, but also on addressing DACA in a way that makes sense. Don't do it ad hoc; do it through the congressional process. So you've challenged us, and we should step up to that challenge. And we're going to do it in a bipartisan fashion, but we have to put our best foot forward.

And we're going to do that with this legislation. It's going to address DACA in a permanent way, not a temporary short-term thing. We're going to address the border enforcement and security and the wall. We're going to address -- in Mr. McCaul's bill, we're going to address interior enforcement, but not everything that the administration had on its list.

We're going to address chain migration. We're going to end the visa lottery program. We're going to address sanctuary cities and Kate's Law.

We think it is a good bill that will both address the two things our Speaker told us right after you made your decision, which is, we have to address the problem we have with the DACA kids being in limbo, as Dick Dubin described it, and I agree with that. But we also have to make sure this does not happen again.

TRUMP: And, Dick, you and the Democrats are going to have a lot of things that they're not going to agree -- you're going to talk to us about it. I just felt that this is something that was long overdue. You'd have a meeting and you'd say, this is what we want. We'd have a meeting -- and this has been going on for years. And I just -- you know, at a certain point, maybe I'll just lock the doors and I won't let anybody out -- (laughter) -- until they come and agree.

Michael, do you have something to say about the bill?

REPRESENTATIVE MCCAUL: Yes, I've been in Congress for seven terms. I've been trying to get this border secure for seven terms in Congress. I think this is a bipartisan issue. I think DACA is a bipartisan issue.

We have an opportunity, I think, before us to get this done for the American people. When it comes to chain migration and the lottery system, we saw two recent terror attacks in New York that were the result of this, I think, failed immigration policy. We'd like to see that fixed for the American people and along with, as Bob talked about, sanctuary cities.

Now, you and I talked about this extensively. So we think our bill, our House bill would be a good starting ground for this negotiation. And I, too, want to commend you for bringing everybody together.

I think what we don't want to see happen is for the conditions for DACA to occur again. We want to get security done so we don't have to deal with this problem five more years down the road.

So thank you, sir.

TRUMP: Well, there are so many points of agreement, and a lot of it is common sense. And I really think we're going to come out very well.

David Perdue, do you have something to say?

REPRESENTATIVE PERDUE: Well, yeah, my observation is that three times in the last eleven years, well-intentioned people, some of whom are in this room, attempted to do what we're starting to try to do today, and we failed. And I think the difference is, is their mission creep ended up in an effort that became too comprehensive.

And so, today, my encouragement for all of us is to do what Dick has been trying to do and talks about repeatedly, and that is to limit the scope of this. And I like the idea that both sides have pressure to solve the DACA issue. But I think the bigger issue here is not just the DACA issue, but what we can do to start the path to the steps that solve this immigration problem. For several reasons -- there are social issues; there are political issues; there are economic issues about our workforce that have to be addressed.

But limiting this to the legal immigration side and combining the balance between various solutions on DACA; DREAMers, if it gets in the conversation; as well border security and chain migration, I think therein lies the balance of a good deal that can be done.

And I don't think -- I agree with Dick. I don't think it's going to take long to get it done if we just lock ourselves in a room and make it happen.

TRUMP: I think you're right. I think it could be done very quickly.

Would anybody have anything to say prior to the press leaving?

REPRESENTATIVE MCSALLY: Mr. President, I just have one comment.

TRUMP: Yes.

REPRESENTATIVE MCSALLY: Senator Durbin mentioned that lives are hanging in the balance. As we come up on the January 19th deadline, the lives that are hanging in the balance are those of our military that are needing the equipment and the funding and everything they need in order to keep us safe, and we should not playing politics on this issue to stop our military from getting the funding that they need.

I think we have the right people in the room to solve this issue. The deadline is March 5th. Let's roll up our sleeves and work together on this. But those who need us right now before the January 19 deadline is our military. And let's not play politics with that. Let's give them what they need to keep us safe.

TRUMP: Okay, good. And I think a lot of people would agree with that. We need our military -- I can't say more than ever before. We had wars. Right, Lindsey? We had a lot of other areas and times. But we need our military desperately. Our military has been very depleted. We're rebuilding, and we're building it up quickly, and we're negotiating much better deals with your purveyors and with your manufacturers and with your equipment-makers -- much better than it was before.

I looked at boats that started off at $1.5 billion, and they're up to $18 billion, and they're still not finished. In this case, a particular aircraft carrier. I think it's outrageous. So we're very much agreeing with you on that one.

Would anybody like to say? Yes, Steny, go ahead.

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: I want to follow up on that. There are no Democrats that don't want to make sure that the military is funded properly. And over the last four years, we had an agreement between Mr. Ryan and Senator Murray -- Speaker Ryan and -- that we understand that our military is critically important. But we also understand that our domestic issues, whether it's education, whether it's healthcare, whether it's environment, whether it's transportation and infrastructure, they're important, as well.

And both the defense and non-defense sides of the budget are hurt when you have a CR, because they cannot blink and they cannot get contracts if they don't have any money to do so. So that, very frankly, I think Ms. McSally is correct. But what we ought to have done over the last six months -- particularly when we did the September and we gave 90 days -- is to reach some agreement on what the caps are going to be. The Murray-Ryan agreements were parity. We believe that's very important.

So we can get to where we should get and want to get there, but we ought to have an agreement based upon what the last --

TRUMP: But, Steny, we do have to take politics out of the military. We need that military. All the other things we talk about, we're not going to be here if we don't have the right military. And we need our military, and we need it stronger than ever before, and we're ready to do it. But we have to take politics out of the military.

One thing that I think we can really get along with on a bipartisan basis -- and maybe I'm stronger on this than a lot of the people on the Republican side, but I will tell you, we have great support from the Republicans -- is infrastructure. I think we can do a great infrastructure bill. I think we're going to have a lot of support from both sides, and I'd like to get it done as quickly as possible.

Yes, John.

SENATOR CORNYN: Mr. President, I, too, want to thank you for getting us together. You made the point last week when Republicans were meeting with you that, why are we continuing to have these meetings just among ourselves when what we need to do to get to a solution is to meet, as we are today, as you insisted, on bipartisan basis.

But part of my job is to count votes in the Senate. And as you know when you hosted us, the leadership, at Camp David this weekend, I believe both the Speaker and Majority Leader McConnell made crystal clear that they would not proceed with a bill on the floor of the Senate or the House unless it had your support, unless you would sign it.

So that's, I think, the picture we need to be looking through -- the lens we need to be looking through is not only what could we agree to among ourselves on a bipartisan basis, but what will you sign into law. Because we all want to get to a solution here, and we realize the clock is ticking.

But I think that for me frames the issue about as well as I can.

TRUMP: Thank you. Very well said. One of the reasons I'm here, Chuck, so importantly, is exactly that. I mean, normally you wouldn't have a President coming to this meeting. Normally, frankly, you'd have Democrats, Republicans, and maybe nothing would get done.

Our system lends itself to not getting things done, and I hear so much about earmarks -- the old earmark system -- how there was a great friendliness when you had earmarks. But of course, they had other problems with earmarks. But maybe all of you should start thinking about going back to a form of earmarks. Because this system -- (laughter) --

PARTICIPANT: Yes, yes, yes. (Laughter.)

TRUMP: This system -- (laughter) -- but you should do it, and I'm there with you, because this system really lends itself to not getting along. It lends itself to hostility and anger, and they hate the Republicans. And they hate the Democrats. And in the old days of earmarks, you can say what you want about certain Presidents and others, where they all talk about they went out to dinner at night and they all got along, and they passed bills. That was an earmark system, and maybe we should think about it.

And we have to put better controls because it got a little bit out of hand, but maybe that brings people together. Because our system right now, the way it's set up, will never bring people together.

Now, I think we're going to get this done -- DACA. I think we're going to get -- I hope we're going to get infrastructure done in the same way.

But I think you should look at a form of earmarks. I see Lindsey nodding very hard "yes."

SENATOR GRAHAM: Starting with the Port of Charleston. Absolutely. (Laughter.)

TRUMP: A lot of the pros are saying that if you want to get along and if you want to get this country really rolling again, you have to look at a different form, because this is obviously out of control.

The levels of hatred -- and I'm not talking about Trump. I'm talking you go back throughout the eight years of Obama and you go before that, the animosity and the hatred between Republicans and Democrats.

I remember when I used to go out in Washington, and I'd see Democrats having dinner with Republicans. And they were best friends, and everybody got along. You don't see that too much anymore. In all due respect, you really don't see that. When was the last time you took a Republican out? Why don't you guys go and have dinner together? (Laughter.)

But you don't see it. So maybe, and very importantly, totally different from this meeting, because we're going to get DACA done -- I hope we're going to get DACA done, and we're going to all try very hard -- but maybe you should start bringing back a concept of earmarks. It's going to bring you together. You're going to do it honestly. You're going to get rid of the problems that the other system had -- and it did have some problems. But one thing it did is it brought everyone together. And this country has to be brought together. Okay? Thank you.

Yes, Lindsey?

SENATOR GRAHAM: Well, at 6:40 p.m., I'm going to go to Menendez's office, and he's taking me to dinner. (Laughter.)

And he's buying.

TRUMP: Sounds like fun.

SENATOR GRAHAM: He didn't know that, but he's buying. We're going to Morton's. You're all welcome to come. (Laughter.)

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: We can usually get bipartisan agreement when the other guy buys. (Laughter.) TRUMP: I think it's a very important thing, because our system is designed, right now, that everybody should hate each other. And we can't have that. You know, we have a great country. We have a country that's doing very well in many respects. We're just hitting a new high on the stock market again, and that means jobs. I don't look at the stocks, I look at the jobs. I look at the 401(k)s, I look at what's happening, where police come up to me and they say, "Thank you. You're making me look like a financial genius" -- literally -- meaning about them. And their wives never thought that was possible, right?

No, the country is doing well in so many ways, but there's such divisiveness, such division. And I really believe we can solve that. I think this system is a very bad system in terms of getting together. And I'm going to leave it up to you, but I really believe you can do something to bring it together.

SENATOR GRAHAM: Other than going to dinner with Bob -- I've been doing this for 10 years -- I don't think I've seen a better chance to get it done than I do right now, because of you. John's right -- I'm not going to support a deal if you don't support it. I've had my head beat out a bunch; I'm still standing. I'm "Lindsey Grahamnesty," "Lindsey Gomez" -- you name every name you want to give to me, it's been assigned to me. And I'm still standing.

The people of South Carolina want a result. How can I get a letter? I've been for a pathway to citizenship for 11 million people because I have no animosity toward them. I don't want crooks, I don't want "bad hombres." I want to get a merit-based immigration system to make sure we can succeed in the 21st century, and I'm willing to be more than fair to the 11 million. I just don't want to do this every 20 years.

Now, we made a decision, Mr. President, not to do it comprehensively. I think that's a smart decision but a hard decision. We've passed three comprehensive bills out of the Senate with over 55 votes. They go to the House and die, and I'm not being disparaging to my House colleagues, this is tough politics if you're a Republican House member turning on the radio.

To my Democratic friends, thanks for coming. The Resist Movement hates this guy. They don't want him to be successful at all. You turn on Fox News, and I can hear the drumbeat coming. Right-wing radio and TV talk show hosts are going to beat the crap out of us because it's going to be amnesty all over again. I don't know if the Republican and Democratic Party can define love, but I think what we can do is do what the American people want us to do.

Sixty-two percent of the Trump voters support a pathway to citizenship for the DACA kids if you have strong borders. You have created an opportunity in here, Mr. President, and you need to close the deal.

TRUMP: Thank you, Lindsey. You know, it's very interesting because I do have people that are -- just to use a very common term -- very far right and very far left. They're very unhappy about what we're doing, but I really don't believe they have to be, because I really think this sells itself. And, you know, when you talk about comprehensive immigration reform, which is where I would like to get to eventually -- if we do the right bill here, we are not very far way. You know, we've done most of it. You want to know the truth, Dick? If we do this properly, DACA, you're not so far away from comprehensive immigration reform.

And if you want to take it that further step, I'll take the heat, I don't care. I don't care -- I'll take all the heat you want to give me, and I'll take the heat off both the Democrats and the Republicans. My whole life has been heat. (Laughter.) I like heat, in a certain way. But I will.

I mean, you are somewhat more traditional politicians. Two and a half years ago, I was never thinking in terms of politics. Now I'm a politician. You people have been doing it, many of you, all your lives. I'll take all the heat you want. But you are not that far away from comprehensive immigration reform. And if you wanted to go that final step, I think you should do it. And if you want to study earmarks to bring us all together, so we all get together and do something, I think you should study it.

Chuck, did you have something to say?

SENATOR GRASSLEY: I'd like to talk about the reality of the whole situation and take off from what Cornyn and Graham have said of the necessity of you working with us. And you are doing that by having this meeting and other meetings as well. But we've always talked in the United States Senate about the necessity of getting 60 votes. And that's pretty darn tough.

But if we would write a bill that you don't like and you veto it, we're talking about a 67-vote threshold -- two-thirds in the United States Senate. So that's the reality of negotiating in good faith and getting something you can sign.

The second reality is the March 5th date that's coming up. Because if we don't do some good-faith negotiation and make progress, and get a bill on the floor of the United States Senate, our leader is going to have to bring up either the House bill or the bill that some of us have introduced in the United States Senate, and we're going to have a vote on it. And those people that don't want to vote to legalize DACA kids are going to have to explain why they haven't wanted to protect the vulnerable people that we're all here talking about. We're talking about everything except doing something for the DACA kids.

You know, I would vote for a path to citizenship, which isn't very easy for me, but I would do it just as an effort. But there are certain things that we got to guarantee that we're going to do.

TRUMP: Chuck, that's going to be brought up. I really believe that will be brought up as part of what we're talking about, at some point. It's an incentive for people to do a good job, if you want to know the truth. That whole path is an incentive for people -- and they're not all kids. I mean, we're used to talking about kids. They're not really kids. You have them 39, 40 years old, in some cases. But it would be an incentive for people to work hard and do a good job. So that could very well be brought up. SENATOR GRASSLEY: We're talking about legalizing people here that didn't break the law because their parents, who broke the law, brought them here. And we ought to be talking about what we can do for the people that had no fault of their own, and get the job done, and not worry about a lot of other things that we're involved in. And that means that we got to make sure that we tell the American people, when we're taking this step, that we're doing something that all the people agree to.

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: Mr. President, let me just say, I think Dick and I agree with what Chuck Grassley just said.

TRUMP: That's hard to believe. When was the last time that happened? (Laughter.)

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: We need to take care of these DACA kids, and we all agree on that. Eighty-six percent of the American public agrees on that.

With all due respect, Bob, and Mike, and Lindsey, there are some things that you're proposing that are going to be very controversial and will be an impediment to agreement.

TRUMP: But you're going to negotiate those things. You're going to sit down and you're going to say, listen, we can't agree here, we'll give you half of that, we're going to -- you're going to negotiate those things.

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: Mr. President, comprehensive means comprehensive.

TRUMP: No, we're not talking about comprehensive. Now we're talking about --

REPRESENTATIVE HOYER: No, we are. We are talking about comprehensive.

TRUMP: If you want to go there, it's okay because you're not that far away.

SENATOR HOYER: Mr. President, many of the things that are mentioned ought be a part of the negotiations regarding comprehensive immigration reform.

TRUMP: I think if you want to take it a step further, you may -- I'm going to have to rely on you, Dick -- but you may complicate it and you may delay DACA somewhat.

SENATOR DURBIN: I don't want to do that.

SENATOR HOYER: You can't do that.

SENATOR DURBIN: You said at the outset that we need to phase this. I think the first phase is what Chuck and Steny and I have mentioned, and others as well: We have a deadline looming and a lot of lives hanging. We can agree on some very fundamental and important things together on border security, on chain, on the future of diversity visas. Comprehensive, though, I worked on it for six months with Michael Bennet, and a number of -- Bob Menendez, and Schumer, and McCain, and Jeff Flake -- and it took us six months to put it together. We don't have six months for the DACA bill.

PARTICIPANT: We're not talking about comprehensive immigration.

PARTICIPANT: Take a look at our bill and let's talk some.

PARTICIPANT: I hear you.

SENATOR DURBIN: You've mentioned a number of factors that are going to be controversial, as Steny has mentioned.

TRUMP: But you're going to negotiate. Dick, you're going to negotiate. Maybe we will agree and maybe we won't. I mean, it's possible we're not going to agree with you and it's possible we will, but there should be no reason for us not to get this done.

And, Chuck, I will say, when this group comes back -- hopefully with an agreement -- this group and others from the Senate, from the House, comes back with an agreement, I'm signing it. I mean, I will be signing it. I'm not going to say, "Oh, gee, I want this or I want that." I'll be signing it, because I have a lot of confidence in the people in this room that they're going to come up with something really good.

Senator, would you like to say something?

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: I would. As you know, we tried for comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate. It was on the floor, there were a number of amendments, it got a lot of attention in the judiciary committee, and then the House didn't take it up.

I think there needs to be a willingness on both sides. And I think -- and I don't know how you would feel about this, but I'd like to ask the question: What about a clean DACA bill now, with a commitment that we go into a comprehensive immigration reform procedure? Like we did back -- oh, I remember when Kennedy was here and it was really a major, major effort, and it was a great disappointment that it went nowhere.

TRUMP: I remember that. I have no problem. I think that's basically what Dick is saying. We're going to come up with DACA. We're going to do DACA, and then we can start immediately on the phase two, which would be comprehensive.

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: Would you be agreeable to that?

TRUMP: I think a lot of people would like to see that, but I think we have to do DACA first.

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: Mr. President, you need to be clear though. I think what Senator Feinstein is asking here: When we talk about just DACA, we don't want to be back here two years later. We have to have security, as the Secretary would tell you.

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: But I think that's what she's saying.

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: What do you think I'm saying?

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: I'm thinking you're saying DACA is not secure. Are you talking about security as well?

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: Well, I think if we have some meaningful comprehensive immigration reform, that's really where the security goes. And if we can get the DACA bill, because March is coming and people are losing their status every day --

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: But, let's be honest. Security was voted on just a few years ago, and, no disrespect, there's people in the room on the other side of the aisle who voted for it. If I recall, Senator Clinton voted for it. So I don't think that's comprehensive; I think that's dealing with DACA at the same time. I think that's really what the President is making.

It's kind of like three pillars: DACA, because we're all in the room want to do it; border security, so we're not back out here; and chain migration. It's just three items, and then everything else that's comprehensive is kind of moved to the side.

So I believe when the (inaudible) --

TRUMP: And the lottery.

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: And the lottery.

TRUMP: And I think you should add merit. I mean, if you can, add merit-based. (Laughter.) I don't think -- I don't know who is going to argue with merit-based? Who can argue with merit-based?

Dianne, go ahead.

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: Can I ask a question? Do you really think that there can be agreement on all of that, quickly, to get DACA passed in time? I wanted to ask Mr. McCarthy a question. Do you really think there can be agreement on those three difficult subjects you raised in time to get DACA passed and effective?

REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTHY: Yes, because you have heard from Leader McConnell and Speaker Ryan, who said they will put the bill onto the floor if the President agrees to it. And us getting to the room, I haven't seen us be this close and having this discussion in quite a few years -- or the whole last four years.

So I think, yes, we can make this happen. We all know it. We've done it before. You and I spent a long time -- we did probably one of the most difficult things to do in California -- water. And I believe we can get there and we can just keep working each day on this.

TRUMP: I think what we're all saying is we'll do DACA and we can certainly start comprehensive immigration reform the following afternoon. Okay? We'll take an hour off and then we'll start.

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: Okay.

TRUMP: I do believe that. Because once we get DACA done -- if it's done properly -- with, you know, security, and everything else --

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: That's the point.

TRUMP: If it's done properly, we have taken a big chunk of comprehensive out of the negotiation, and I don't think it's going to be that complicated.

SENATOR PERDUE: Mr. President, we have --

TRUMP: Yes.

SENATOR PERDUE: We have to be very clear though.

TRUMP: Go ahead.

SENATOR PERDUE: In my opinion, we'll be right back here either five years, thirty years, whatever. But this, the chain migration, is so insidious; it is the fundamental flaw in the immigration policy of the United States. If any conversation about DACA is being held without that consideration -- I agree with border security as well -- but any conversation about that is not going to go anywhere in the United States Senate. And if we think we're going to divide one side versus the other, that's just not going to happen on this issue.

TRUMP: David, I think chain migration has taken a very big hit over the last six months. People are seeing what's happening.

People -- for instance, the man on the Westside Highway that killed the people and so badly wounded. You know, it's incredible when they talk about wounded, they don't say that arms are off, and legs are off, one person lost two legs. You know, nobody talks about it. They said eight died, but they don't talk about the twelve people that have no legs, no arms, and all of the things. So I'm talking about everybody.

I really believe that when you talk about the subject that we're all mentioning right now, I think they had -- how many people came in? Twenty-two to twenty-four people came in through him. He's a killer. He's a guy who ran over eight -- many people -- eight died; ten to twelve are really badly injured. So I really think that a lot of people are going to agree with us now on that subject. I really don't see there's a big --

SENATOR PERDUE: Seventy percent of Americans want the immigration policy to be, the family -- the nuclear family and the workers. Seventy percent.

TRUMP: David, the chain immigration, though, has taken a very big hit in the last year with what's happening. I mean, you're looking at these killers -- whether you like or not -- we're looking at these killers and then you see, 18 people came in, 22 people came in, 30 people came in, with this one person that just killed a lot of people. I really don't believe there are a lot of Democrats saying, "We will be supporting chain migration," anymore.

PARTICIPANT: Mr. President, should we get the Homeland Security Secretary --

SECRETARY NIELSEN: Yeah, if you don't mind. Just on a couple of things on border security. I just want to try to make sure we're all linking.

The reason that border security is so important to have as part of this discussion is that it doesn't solve the problem if we can apprehend people but we can't remove them. So we need the wall system, which is some physical infrastructure as the President described -- personnel and technology -- but we have to close those legal loopholes, because the effect is that is this incredible pull up from Central America that just continues to exacerbate the problem. So border security has to be part of this or we will be here again in three, four, five years again -- maybe, unfortunately, sooner.

The other point I would just make is, the President asked DHS -- he asked the men and women of DHS, what do you need to do your job? Congress and the American people have entrusted to you, the security of our country. What is it that you need? The list that we have provided is what we need to do our mission that you asked us to do. It's not less than, it's not more than; it is what we need to close those loopholes to be able to protect our country.

So I would just encourage -- everyone, much more eloquently than I can, described all the reasons why we all, I think, are committed to helping the DACA population. But to truly solve the problem, it's got to be in conjunction with border security.

TRUMP: Jeff.

SENATOR FLAKE: I would just echo what has been said by some here. Those of us who have been through comprehension reform, that was six, seven months of every night negotiating, staff on weekends. And a lot of things we're talking about on border security and some of the interior things have trade-offs, and we made those during that process. I don't see how we get there before March 5th.