Return to Transcripts main page

New Day

Unruly Passenger Forces Flight to Land; Robert Durst Charged with First-Degree Murder; Obama 'Embarrassed' for GOP Over Iran Letter; Netanyahu Rules Out Palestinian State. Aired 6-6:30a ET

Aired March 17, 2015 - 06:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

<05:58:14> UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No! Come on!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Don't fight, David.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We've got a situation with a passenger.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Help me! Pick me up!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He ran forward towards the cockpit.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I'm (UNINTELLIGIBLE).

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The deadline really is approaching.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Iranian and U.S. officials try to make progress in their nuclear negotiations.

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The absolute best option is a diplomatic resolution.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It appears Durst was preparing to flee to Cuba.

DICK DEGUERN, DEFENSE ATTORNEY FOR ROBERT DURST: He's ready to end all the rumor and speculation.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I still believe to this day in my heart he's responsible for the death of three people.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It's being described as eight minutes of sheer terror.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The brothers had carjacked an SUV.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He basically sits there, strokes his beard. He's not showing any emotion.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ANNOUNCER: This is NEW DAY, with Chris Cuomo, Alisyn Camerota and Michaela Pereira.

ALISYN CAMEROTA, CNN ANCHOR: And good morning, everyone. Welcome to your NEW DAY. It is Tuesday, March 17, 6 a.m. in the East. Chris Cuomo is off this week. John Berman joins us.

Happy St. Patty's Day.

MICHAELA PEREIRA, CNN ANCHOR: To you, too.

CAMEROTA: We do begin with breaking news for you. Scary moments in the sky aboard a United Airlines flight forced to return to Dulles Airport outside Washington, D.C., after a passenger reportedly tried to rush the cockpit.

PEREIRA: Yes, but passengers jumped in to subdue that unruly passenger. The whole ordeal, as you can see there, the end of it, captured on cell phone video.

CNN's Rene Marsh joins us now from Dulles International Airport with more.

How frightening, Rene.

RENE MARSH, CNN AVIATION & GOVT. REGULATION CORRESPONDENT: Absolutely, Michaela, and you're about to hear the pilots as they phoned in or declared an emergency mid-air.

As you mentioned, that take-down of that unruly passenger, it was all caught on camera.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Declaring an emergency due to a passenger disturbance.

MARSH (voice-over): Breaking overnight, a frightening scene aboard a Denver-bound jetliner.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He ran forward towards the cockpit, and he is being restrained by other passengers.

MARSH: This passenger was screaming and tried to rushed the cockpit. But passengers on board subdued him shortly after takeoff.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I'm so sorry. So sorry.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Don't move, David. You're OK. We're going to get you off this plane. We're going to get you off this plane, buddy.

MARSH: United Airlines Flight 1074, heading from the Washington, D.C., area to Denver at around 10:40 p.m. when the incident forced the pilot to turn around.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The cockpit is secure. And we would just like to return to the airport and have the authorities meet him.

MARSH: A spokesman for the airline saying, in part, "Flight 1074 returned to the airport following takeoff on Monday evening after a passenger failed to comply with crew instructions. Local law enforcement officials met the aircraft at the gate and detained the passenger."

This video taken by one of the passengers during the altercation. Bruises below his right cheek and near his mouth. Several others holding down his head as one person tries to calm him down.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Relax and don't move.

MARSH: A spokeswoman for the airport saying no passengers were injured and no weapon was found. The unruly passenger was eventually removed by law enforcement and taken to a hospital for evaluation.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK, OK, OK, OK. I got him.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You got him? You got him?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Oh, yes.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MARSH: Tense moments indeed. Now as for the remaining passengers on board, United Airlines says that it plans on getting them to their destination, Denver, this morning -- Michaela.

PEREIRA: Remarkable how the cockpit remained calm and those passengers, even in the midst of trying to restrain that man, kept calm. Thanks so much for that, Rene.

New York real estate heir Robert Durst has been charged with a first- degree murder charge in the execution-style death of his friend, Susan Berman in 2000. Durst's extradition to California delayed while he faces criminal charges in New Orleans, where he was arrested over the weekend. CNN's Miguel Marquez joins us with all of the latest developments -- Miguel.

MIGUEL MARQUEZ, CNN CORRESPONDENT: What an incredible case. So many developments there are.

Look, he is meant to go to California very soon to face those murder charges. He didn't fight extradition, but now he is facing gun and marijuana charges in New Orleans; and he may in court again later today.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MARQUEZ (voice-over): This morning, New York real-estate heir, Robert Durst, remains behind bars in New Orleans. The millionaire picked up in the lobby of a Marriott Hotel Saturday, staying under a false name with a fake driver's license. In his possession, a .38 revolver, marijuana, and a substantial amount of cash.

One official says it appears Durst was preparing to flee to Cuba.

The eccentric 71-year-old now facing felony firearm and drug charges, complicating his extradition to Los Angeles, where Durst will be tried for first-degree murder of close friend and crime novelist, Susan Berman. DEGUERN: Bob Durst didn't kill Susan Berman. He's ready to end all

the rumor and speculation and have a trial.

MARQUEZ: Prosecutors, citing new evidence, alleged the millionaire was lying in wait before shooting Berman execution-style in her living room nearly 15 years ago.

According to reports, police were set to question her over the 1982 disappearance of Durst's first wife, Kathie McCormick. That case remains unsolved.

Meanwhile, an NYPD official says state police here are seeking information about the various timelines Durst provided to detectives during his wife's disappearance.

The hit HBO docuseries "The Jinx" possibly providing incriminating clues to the decades-old case.

ROBERT DURST, MURDER SUSPECT: There it is. You're caught.

MARQUEZ: The documentary's shocking finale Sunday reveals Durst mumbling to himself in the bathroom, seemingly admitting to murder.

DURST: What the hell did I do? Killed them all, of course.

MARQUEZ: The filmmakers going to police, finding the bombshell off- camera comments some two years after wrapping the final interviews. Durst's lawyer called it ramblings and that the millionaire admitted nothing.

DEGUERN: We're ready to go to California and have a trial.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Not guilty.

MARQUEZ: Durst already beat murder charges in 2003 after admitting he killed and dismembered neighbor Morris Black in Texas, claiming self- defense.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MARQUEZ: Now, the huge question is whether or not that admission, or so-called admission, will ever be heard by a jury. Lawyers are split on that, and it is only a matter of time before he gets to California and all of that begins to get sorted out. He could beat the rap yet again -- Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: Oh, my goodness. OK, Miguel, so much to talk about.

Let's bring in former FBI assistant director and CNN law enforcement analyst, Tom Fuentes; and from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, former New York city police officer Eugene O'Donnell. Gentlemen, thanks so much for being here.

<06:05:00> CAMEROTA: So Eugene, it seems as though this film, this HBO film "The Jinx," is what gave prosecutors the ability to break this cold case. I mean, that's what -- this was cold for a long time. And now, just because it aired -- I want to ask you about the timing of this. Why did they wait until the finale of this film to arrest him?

EUGENE O'DONNELL, JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE: I highly doubt that that's the reason. I think it's a coincidence. No question it's been a full-court press. These are brutal crimes that people are on top of him for. So I don't know that the timing is anything more than coincidence.

CAMEROTA: Tom, let me ask you, it seems as though two damning pieces of evidence came out in this HBO film. The first was this letter, OK. So an envelope, one written by the killer of Susan Berman to the police department, telling them where to find her body. The other, that you're seeing on the bottom there, written by the guy himself, to his friend, Susan Berman, right, Robert Durst.

Tom, look at these two handwriting samples. These are exactly alike.

TOM FUENTES, CNN LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYST: That's right, Alisyn, and I think it doesn't take a document expert to look at that and say just what you've just said: they look exactly alike.

CAMEROTA: I mean even to the point where "Beverly Hills" is misspelled. Tom, this is for the jury this is an open-and-shut case, isn't it?

FUENTES: You know, I don't know that anything is ever an open-and- shut case already, especially with Durst. So, you know, we'll have to see. But I think that certainly is very incriminating that that printing looks so close. Almost looks exactly identical.

And then the other -- the other evidence that's been uncovered, such as the microphone, you know, where he's in the bathroom, sounding like he admits to murder.

Now I think that, you know, that's probably going to go before -- before a jury. Whether a jury gets talked out of thinking that it's a confession by his presentation from his defense attorney, that will be another story.

CAMEROTA: Eugene, let's listen to that moment, OK? So Robert Durst was wearing a hot mic. He took a break. He went into the bathroom, and he is talking to himself in what sounds like an apparent confession. Listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DURST: What the hell did I do? Killed them all, of course.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CAMEROTA: Killed them all, of course. Do you think that's going to be admissible in court?

O'DONNELL: I think it's going to be admissible. And I would argue in this case that some people have a compulsion, almost, to confess. This guy is haunted by this case. That's the prosecutor side of me.

I think the argument here is clear. In this private place where he didn't think he was being heard, you've got to look inside of his mind, and his mind is a guilty mind for the crimes that he's committed.

CAMEROTA: And you think the jury will hear that?

O'DONNELL: I think there's little doubt they'll hear it. Again, as Tom said, what they'll make of it is going to be a whole other conversation.

CAMEROTA: Here's a different opinion. This comes from a Harvard Law professor, who believes it will be inadmissible. Let me read you this. He says here, here are some theories about what he could have been doing in the bathroom. "He could be asking himself rhetorically what everyone thinks he's done. He could be musing on what he might say to the camera. He could be fantasizing. Durst's statement therefore will almost certainly never reach a jury."

Tom, what do you think of that theory?

FUENTES: Well, I think that -- I disagree with it. I'm not a Harvard Law professor, but I think that, you know, in this situation, the jury will get a chance to hear it, because this is not law enforcement secretly wire-tapping him without authority. It's not even a journalist doing that. He knew he was miked up. He knew he was doing this interview for HBO. And, you know, the mic, whether it was turned on or turned off, whether he believed it was on or off, in a sense doesn't matter. He knew he was miked up and wasn't careful enough to keep his mouth shut.

Now, you know, in the statement by the professor, you know, they're saying, "Well, the jury might not believe it because of this reason. They might not believe it because of that." Well, that's all true. I would agree with that. They might not believe that that's what he's admitting to. But I think that -- I don't think they're going to be able to exclude that from being heard by a jury.

CAMEROTA: There's another theory, Eugene, that when you're in the bathroom, there's a presumption of privacy.

O'DONNELL: Usually, that's an issue about the government eavesdropping, overhearing somebody's conversation. That's not the issue here. The Constitution is to stop the government from overreaching. It's not an insurance policy against doing something stupid, which apparently he did. He left a mic on and implicated himself.

By the way, I would add, this is a weighty issue, so the idea that the guy is rambling or whatever, this is about a murder, and he's been a suspect in murder cases. So it's a very serious thing to be just talking about and revealing your soul, I think, as he did in this case.

CAMEROTA: So Tom, very quickly, do you think that Robert Durst's decades of eluding the law and, some would say, getting away with murder has come to an end?

FUENTES: Well, you would think so. But you know, again anything is possible in court. Some of the previous case -- the previous case that he was tried for in Texas, you would have thought was pretty clear; and the jury decided that he dismembered somebody in self- defense.

<06:10:05> FUENTES: So you know, you don't know what's going to happen, for sure. But it would look like this time it might be.

CAMEROTA: Tom Fuentes, Eugene O'Donnell, thanks so much for helping us break it down.

And later this morning, we will talk with Ellen Strauss. She's a friend of Robert Durst's first wife, Kathie, who disappeared in 1982. So stick around for that.

Also, let us know what you think. Should evidence from the HBO film "The Jinx" be admissible in court? Tweet us, @NewDay, or you can find us on Facebook.com/NewDay. You can also find me on Twitter, @AlisynCamerota.

Let's go over to John.

JOHN BERMAN, CNN ANCHOR: A fascinating discussion about what is legal and what is ethical there. Thanks so much, Alisyn.

The U.S. and Iran back at the negotiating table this morning over Iran's nuclear program. That as President Obama fires back at the 47 Senate Republicans who signed the controversial letter to Iran, insisting that it is not the way that America does business.

This morning, a new CNN/ORC poll shows an overwhelming majority of Americans favor direct diplomacy with the Iranians. Let's begin our coverage with CNN senior White House correspondent Michelle Kosinski -- Michelle.

MICHELLE KOSINSKI, CNN SENIOR WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: A large majority, 68 percent feel that the U.S. should be negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program. And on that letter, signed by 47 Senate Republicans, telling Iran that Congress plays a bigger role than Iran might expect, more people, 49 percent, felt that it went too far. Thirty-nine percent felt it was appropriate. And President Obama had a lot to say about that in an interview he just did with Vice News.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I'm embarrassed for them, because it's not how America does business. They were effectively making common cause with the hardliners in Iran, who also don't want any kind of diplomatic resolution, because they're invested in getting a nuclear weapon.

(END VIDEO CLIP) KOSINSKI: Well, people weighed in on him, too. When asked, who do you have more confidence in to handle foreign policy and major issues facing America, about 47 percent chose him. Thirty-nine percent chose Republicans in Congress. Although overall, men chose Congress, and one in ten people chose neither -- Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: OK. Michelle, thanks so much for that analysis.

Well, the deadline to reach a nuclear deal with Iran less than two weeks away, European negotiators say talks have reached a critical phase with broad disagreements remaining. CNN's senior international correspondent, Nic Robertson, has the latest live from London.

What do we know this morning, Nic?

NIC ROBERTSON, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Yes. Good morning, Alisyn.

The clock really ticking down to that March 31 deadline. A two-hour meeting this morning between the foreign minister of Iran, Zarif, and Secretary Kerry. We're not clear yet. We haven't been briefed on what came out of the meeting. But we do know how the five-hour session yesterday didn't seem to go well.

State Department officials saying that there are still differences that need to be bridged, that Iran needs to make some necessary and tough choices. And that they and the State Department are not clear that the 31st of March deadline is achievable.

Zarif, for his part, came out of the meeting yesterday saying that, "Well finally we've got something." You know, an indication there that he felt that he was making some gains, but then he went to Europe yesterday, met with the French, the Germany, the British foreign ministers. And a senior European diplomatic source told the Reuters news agency that significant gaps remain.

But the difference is, despite the long session with the Europeans yesterdays, differences hadn't been narrowed. And that really seems to be the tone around the talks right now. The talks are going on. But the gaps are still there. And that's a problem -- Michaela.

PEREIRA: Yes. How to bridge those gaps is the biggest challenge. Isn't it? All right, Nic, thanks so much.

A huge turnout, meanwhile, is expected as Israelis head to the polls this morning. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now pledging, if re- elected, there will not be a Palestinian state, reversing course on promises he made to the U.S. Netanyahu hoping to pull ahead in a very tight race.

CNN's Oren Liebermann is live in Jerusalem outside a polling center with the very latest for us. Good morning, Oren.

OREN LIEBERMANN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Good morning, Michaela.

A busy morning here. A busy morning across Israel. We spoke with election officials who say voter turn-out is up 2 percent from two years ago, if that number holds. That will mean it's 70 percent for the country, a very high number, indicative of how important this election is.

Benjamin Netanyahu making a final push in these final few days and hours. Yesterday, in talking to a local TV station, he said if he is prime minister again, if he's elected, there will not be a Palestinian state. He says it's simply too dangerous, and that would be a base from which to attack Israel.

He voted earlier this morning in and said he's also against a unity government with Isaac Herzog of the Zionist Union Party, his main competitor.

Meanwhile, Isaac Herzog voted a short time after that, about a half an hour later; said that, if he's elected, he would make sure there is change. He said, "Look, if you're happy with the status quo, vote for Netanyahu. If you want different leadership, if you want a new direction, vote for Isaac Herzog."

Both politicians know exactly how close this race -- race is, excuse me. In the final election polls, Isaac Herzog had opened up a four- seat lead. That's not a huge lead, but it's a significant one, because it's the biggest lead we've seen in these elections so far.

John, that higher voter turnout could play a big part in this election. The other question we're really interested in in what is the turnout in the Arab vote? That will be very interesting and could play a large role in deciding who's the next prime minister.

BERMAN: Polls close there at 4 p.m. Eastern Time here in the United States. We'll watch for the results. Oren Liebermnan, thanks so much.

The president of Vanuatu appealing for immediate help after that island nation was slammed by a monster cyclone. He says the Category 5 storm destroyed nearly all the infrastructure on that island chain and could take years to rebuild. A state of emergency has been declared.

Aid is arriving, but slowly, providing the basic needs for victims, like clean water and food. Officials say the death toll currently stands at 11, but is expected to rise.

CAMEROTA: Secret Service chief Joe Clancy expected to be grilled this morning at a House appropriations hearing about the agency's latest black eye: those two top-ranking agents suspended for allegedly driving a government vehicle onto the White House property after reportedly drinking and disrupting an investigation into a suspicious package. The White House says President Obama maintains full confidence in Clancy.

PEREIRA: Despite leaking classified information and lying to the FBI about it, former CIA director and retired general David Petraeus is still advising the White House. The Obama administration confirms Petraeus remains a trusted adviser on the U.S. strategy against ISIS. Petraeus pleaded guilty earlier this month to sharing classified information with his mistress and biographer.

BERMAN: Such an interesting debate about David Petraeus right now, because there are people who say he is getting unequal treatment, being treated much more nicely than other people will for committing similar crimes than what he did. He's convicted of a crime. But then there are still others who say that his expertise is so crucial, he has to be.

PEREIRA: Invaluable, right.

CAMEROTA: He's still an accomplished general, even though he had a lapse in judgment. So -- so you know, how why disregard...

PEREIRA: More than one.

CAMEROTA: We'd love to know what you think about that.

Meanwhile, President Obama lashing out at GOP senators for sending that letter to Iran, a letter that appears to have the Iranians upset. Has this damaged the chances for a deal?

PEREIRA: And the White House is crowing about the new Obamacare figures. The number of insured Americans has risen sharply. So why -- why are Republicans doing everything they can to repeal the law?

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

<06:21:19> PEREIRA: President Obama firing back at 47 Senate Republicans who signed that controversial letter to Iran, calling their actions an embarrassment.

According to a new CNN poll, a majority of Americans agree that that letter went too far. They're backing nuclear talks with Iran. Right now those talks are under way in Switzerland with the Iranians reportedly asking a lot of questions about that GOP letter.

Let's bring in CNN political commentator and contributing editor at Atlantic Media, Peter Beinart; CNN global affairs analyst and managing editor at "Quartz," Bobby Ghosh.

Gentlemen, I want to think about Iran, but I think given the day that's happening today in Israel, we have to talk about that. And Peter, we know you've written for a number of years and are very well connected there and know the issues that are going on.

What was your reaction to Netanyahu essentially declaring the night before the election that there will not be a two-state under his watch, especially when in 2009, he had said the exact opposite?

PETER BEINART, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: Right. I mean, it would be wonderful to know what people in the White House were thinking at that moment. I mean, really, what it shows is that the last six years of his prime ministership have been basically a charade on this front.

I think people who knew Netanyahu well never really believed that he was very serious about a Palestinian state to begin with. He had been against one his entire career. He ran for prime minister in 2009 opposing one and only switched under American pressure, still never really was willing to lay out the parameters of the supposed Palestinian state that he supported.

But still it was quite remarkable that he would ditch all of that. And it does raise the question, if he were to be re-elected, how would Israel's relationship go forward with the Obama administration now that he's publicly broken...

PEREIRA: Makes for an awkward follow-up with the...

BEINART: And things are not very good to begin with.

PEREIRA: No, it really wasn't. And interesting, Bobby, where he made these comments, interesting as well, visiting Ar Oma (ph), a Jewish -- a Jerusalem neighborhood where he authorized the construction against the United States' wishes during his first term. That's obviously a political ploy, clearly.

BOBBY GHOSH, CNN GLOBAL AFFAIRS ANALYST: All of this is -- all of this is sort of last-minute politics. And smacks frankly of desperation as the polls have shown that the voting public is moving away from him and more and more towards the -- towards Isaac Herzog and the Zionist Union, he's been doubling down on the right-wing position, inclined to galvanize that part of the Israeli vote in his favor. And so going to Ar Oma (ph), going to -- saying no two-state solution, this is his last roll of the dice.

PEREIRA: Given what you've heard and what you're seeing and what you're hearing of the conversation and the tone of it, what is the likelihood that he's going to get elected for a fourth term?

BEINART: It -- all the polling has been showing that the Zionist Union will get more seats. The polls show that it will get about four more seats. Now that doesn't -- that's not the end of the day in Israel.

PEREIRA: Right.

BEINART: You know, Zionist Union will probably get about 25 seats. You need to get 61 seats to form a majority. So we're not going to know for weeks. But I think it's more likely that, if they get four more seats, they will be given the opportunity to form a coalition government. It doesn't mean they'll succeed, but they'll have the first opportunity.

PEREIRA: Let's give it to Iran, OK? We know these negotiations are ongoing. What's interesting to me is that during the negotiations, twice, Bobby, twice that GOP letter has resurfaced. It's been brought up in the negotiations on the part of the Iranians. Is that a problem for the U.S.? Or is this more, could you look at it who from the perspective that Iranians are sort of seizing on a moment of weakness?

<06:24:38> GHOSH: Absolutely. This is -- this is a bit of grandstanding from the Iranians. They didn't need to wait until the negotiations in order to raise concerns about the letter. They could have picked up the phone and probably did. So this is a piece of -- this is a negotiating tactic. The Republicans handed them the opportunity to do so. And it will be...

PEREIRA: A softball pitch.

GHOSH: If I were the Iranian negotiator, why wouldn't I take that?

PEREIRA: Right. Let's show a poll. It's been interesting, a CNN/ORC poll released showed that 49 percent, Peter, of the country believe the senators' letter went too far. Agreeing with president, agreeing with Democrats. Forty-four percent -- this I find this interesting -- 44 percent, though, if we look at the next poll, says it won't have an impact at all.

So first of all, the question is, why bother sending the letter if it's not going to have an impact? What's the point of that?

BEINART: Right. Well I think that what you see is that Republicans, especially Tom Cotton, were really trying to throw a wrench into this in whatever way they can. They're also angry that the Obama administration is not going to bring this to a vote in Congress. And they have some degree of legitimacy there. That, you know, a pact of this magnitude would historically have been brought to Congress. So they're trying to kind of influence it however they can.

But the problem is with the Iranians is that the Iranians want to do this deal because they will get some sanctions relief. If they're being told that they can't rely on that sanctions relief, then it makes it less likely for them to make concessions on their end.

PEREIRA: Ten second button, do you think they're going to make headway before this deadline? It sounds as though the firepower negotiations didn't go well yesterday?

GHOSH: If I had to -- if I had to put money down, I would put money down on an extension rather than a conclusive decision one way or the other.

PEREIRA: Well, we'll have you hear to talk about more of it. We will. Paul -- Peter -- called you Paul -- Peter and Bobby, great to have you. Thanks so much -- Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: Thanks, Michaela.

Well, an update now on the Boston Marathon bombing trial. Jurors left the courtroom to go see the boat where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev hid from police in the hours during a citywide lockdown. And wait until you hear who accompanied them on this trip.

06:26:33

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)