Return to Transcripts main page

Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees

Interview with David Axelrod; The Pain of Bain; Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration?

Aired July 16, 2012 - 20:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: Erin, thanks very much.

Good evening, everyone. We begin tonight "Keeping Them Honest" on the campaign trail where attack ads are flying and so is the spin.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney today demanded that President Obama back off his attacks on Romney's record at Bain Capital, the private equity firm where he made his fortune. Now recently those attacks have focused on when Romney actually left the firm. The Obama camp claims Romney lied about his end date at Bain even suggesting his actions could be criminal.

Now in a series of network and cable interviews on Friday, Romney accused the Obama campaign of stooping to new lows. In an interview that aired today on CBS this morning, President Obama was asked about the negative ads his campaign has been running. Here's what he said.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: First of all, we've done a whole slew of positive ads that talked exactly about how we need to change our education system, how we need to change our tax code, how we need to rebuild America. How we need to promote American energy. So those just don't get attention in the news.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Now the president said they've run a whole slew of ads, positive ads. We wanted to -- we wanted to check and see if maybe we'd overlooked a slew of ads either candidate was running.

So "Keeping Them Honest," we checked with CMAG, the consultants who track political ad spending for us. They told us that last week the Obama campaign aired negative ads more than 19,000 times and positive ads fewer than 150 times. In other words less than 1 percent of their ads were positive.

According to other reports, since the general campaign began, as many as 3 in 4 of President Obama's campaign ads have been negative, 3 in 4. Now to be sure, both campaigns are playing hard ball. During the two weeks ending July 9th, about 89 percent of Obama's ads carry an anti-Romney message and 94 percent of Romney's ads criticized President Obama.

That's, again, according to CMAG. Those are the numbers.

The Obama campaign, however, is spinning a very different narrative where the word "negative" doesn't really exist. Over the weekend Obama campaign spokesman Jen Psaki said they wanted to have a, quote, "high brow debate about what Americans really care about."

But "Keeping Them Honest," all weekend long, they instead focused on attacking Romney's ties to Bain and his personal finances.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVID AXELROD, SENIOR STRATEGIST, OBAMA CAMPAIGN: He's taken advantage of every single conceivable attack shelter and loophole.

OBAMA: Mr. Romney attested to the SEC multiple times that he was the chairman, CEO and president of Bain Capital.

That company also was investing in companies that "The Washington Post" called pioneers of outsourcing.

STEPHANIE CUTTER, DEPUTY CAMPAIGN MANAGER, OBAMA CAMPAIGN: If you're telling the sec you're in charge but you're telling the American people that you bear no responsibility, one of those things is not true.

MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL, CHICAGO: Stop whining. Defend -- if you want to claim defend Bain Capital as your calling card for the White House, then defend what happened at the Bain Capital and what happened in -- to those jobs that went overseas. Those jobs that were actually cut and eliminated.

OBAMA: I don't want a pioneer in outsourcing. I want some in- sourcing. I want to bring companies back.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, the attacks continued on paper as well. Virtually all the press releases and statements they issued on Saturday and Sunday hammered Romney on those fronts.

The Obama campaign also released a new attack ad.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message.

MITT ROMNEY (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: (Singing) O beautiful for spacious skies for amber waves of grain, for purple mountains majesty above the fruited plain.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: In a moment we'll talk with Paul Begala and Ari Fleischer. But first, David Axelrod, a senior strategist for the Obama campaign, I talked to him earlier.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: David, I want to ask you something that the president said in an interview that aired this morning on CBS. I want to play that for our viewer.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: First of all, we've done a whole slew of positive ads that talk exactly about how we need to change our education system. How we need to change our tax code. How we need to rebuild America. How we need to promote American energy. So those just don't get attention in the news.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: The consultants who track ad spending for us tell us that last week your campaign aired negative spots more than 19,000 times and positive spots fewer than 150 times. That's less than 1 percent positive ads. Can that really be considered a slew?

AXELROD: Well, Anderson, you've got to go back to when we began our media campaign. We began our media campaign in May. The whole month of May, we ran nothing but positive ads. Right now, we're running ads, some of which are comparative. I don't know how the tracker -- how the tracker characterizes them. Some were comparative on their respective records on taxes. And some are on the elements of Governor Romney's record.

But we've been -- we've been very -- we spent tens and tens of millions -- $50 million or more on positive ads. In contrast, you look at the other side, and 90 percent of their media dollars from the very beginning have been spent on negative ads. The whole premise of the Romney campaign is a negative premise --

COOPER: Three quarters of the ads from the beginning have been negative or characterized as negative. Three quarters of your ads.

AXELROD: In -- of their campaign.

COOPER: No, of your campaign.

AXELROD: Of their campaign or -- well, that's -- we can have that discussion. I can -- we can go over that. But I also would invite you to go out and you guys ran some of the president's speech today. The president's campaigning all over this country. Talking about how we rebuild the middle class in this country. How we rebuild the economy. About education and revitalizing American manufacturing. And all the things we need to do to build -- to build our economy in a way that gives people a chance.

COOPER: The tone of this debate has come under criticism. Jen Psaki, an Obama campaign spokeswoman, said over the weekend that the president wants a highbrow debate about, quote, "what the American people actually care about." The same day your campaign released a brutal spot featuring Mitt Romney singing, "America the Beautiful" off-key. Does that qualify as highbrow or something the American people really care about?

AXELROD: I think what they do care about, Anderson, is are we going to have a tax code that encourages outsourcing. That's what Governor Romney supports. He has a history in this area. Or are we going to support in-sourcing and end those tax breaks and reward folks for creating jobs here in America.

That's what the president supports. Are we going to spend $100 billion a year on off shore tax shelter of the sort that Governor Romney has availed himself off? Or are we going to use that money for better purposes? These are the discussions we're going to have moving forward and the perspective you bring to it is important.

COOPER: Is it just a coincidence, though, that these Bain attacks really came about after some very bad job numbers came out about two weeks ago?

AXELROD: Anderson, I actually think and you may have even talked about it on your show. We've raised issues about Bain, and let me tell you, long before these last couple of weeks, and let me tell you why. The only credential that Governor Romney is offering for the presidency is his business experience. Never talks about the fact that he was governor of Massachusetts and with some good reason because that record wasn't exactly a glittering record of job creation.

So he talks about the fact that he's a business man and he has great insights into the economy as a result. And so of course we're going to look at what that business experience is. And we began that -- taking a look at that as soon as he became the nominee. If this isn't something new, it's part of the discussion. He entered it into the discussion. And now we're engaging in that discussion.

He say wait a second, don't talk about my business experience. So he can talk about his business experience but he doesn't want us to talk about his business experience.

COOPER: Your campaign has even said Romney may be guilty of a felony. He's demanded an apology for that. I know you've made it clear there's no apology coming. At this point, though, is there enough evidence out there to really make that claim?

AXELROD: And no one really made that claim, Anderson. What Stephanie Cutter said was that if in fact you filed papers, as he did back in '99 through 2002, saying you're the chairman, chief executive, president and sole shareholder of a company but now you're arguing that you had nothing to do with the -- with the activities of that company, then it raises questions about that filing or it raises questions about what you're saying now.

As I said yesterday to Candy Crowley, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. I think he's misleading people now. But either way, it's not a recommendation to make a guy president of the United States. COOPER: I want to ask you something that -- about something that a Bush adviser, Mark McKinnon, who worked on his re-election campaign eight years ago, had to say about this race. He said, "Team Obama is doing just what we did in 2004 which is to define the opposition furiously and early. Most voters don't have a deep sense of Romney, other than he's not Obama, and in this cycle, that may be enough, but it's a very risky approach."

He's not the only one making a comparison. Are there real parallels in your opinion between what the Bush campaign did to John Kerry and what your team is doing to Mitt Romney right now? Basically trying to define him based on what's considered by his campaign as strength?

AXELROD: No. Because what the -- what was done back then was to take a guy who was a certified war hero and to suggest that somehow he wasn't. And that was grossly unfair. The fact of the matter is that Governor Romney has a background and an approach and a set of policies that are far different than the ones the president supports.

We are very much for policies that are going to boost the middle class. We believe in building this economy from the middle class out. He believes in a top-down approach. And it flows from his experience and the lens through which he sees this economy. And so that's very much fair game. I wouldn't say it's the same at all.

But let me just add one thing, Anderson, and that is, one of the reasons why Mark notes -- as Mark notes that people don't really know Governor Romney, even though he's run for president twice, is because he's never told them who he is. He's never told them what motivates him. He's never put his own experience into any kind of framework that people could appreciate. And the real question is to address that campaign.

Why do they feel that simply running negative ads against the president from the beginning was sufficient?

COOPER: David Axelrod, appreciate your time, thank you.

AXELROD: OK, good to be with you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Here's one more number from CMAG to factor in. The Obama campaign has so far outspent the Romney campaign on television ads by at least 3 to 1 overall. Just more context for their insistence that they've spent more money on positive ads than Romney had.

Let's talk "Raw Politics" now with CNN political contributor and former White House press secretary for George W. Bush Ari Fleischer, joins us via the phone. CNN political contributor Paul Begala who's also advising a pro-Obama super PAC, joins me as well.

So, Paul, you advise this super PAC which has run a lot these negative ads many thousands of times. Negative campaigning, you're more than OK with it?

PAUL BEGALA, CNN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTOR: Totally, absolutely. The ads to the PAC that I advise which is Priorities USA Action, you can see it for yourself, Prioritiesusaaction.org, they have featured the most powerful ads and the ones we've run the most of. The real words of real people that Mitt Romney laid off.

He came and took over these companies. He loaded them up with debt. He in some cases he bankrupted them. Paid himself millions. And canceled the health benefits. We just sent cameras to places like Marion, Indiana, to Kansas City. And we filmed these people. And they're heartbreaking stories.

The L.A. Times, "Los Angeles Times," Doyle McManus, a terrific journalist, called our ad the most effective Democratic ad this year.

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: So can the president say that -- there's been a slew of positive ads?

BEGALA: Yes, I don't know how many is in a slew. I thought you nailed ax pretty well on this. My view is this, look, first of all, my job I think in this pro-Obama super PAC is simply to define Romney. If we run a single positive ad, I'll be disappointed. I'm hoping to go over 100 percent, Anderson. We might run one more negative ad after the election, you know --

COOPER: You just said if you run a single positive ad, you will be disappointed?

BEGALA: Very. Deeply. And as I say, I'll try to save enough money to run one more after the election so it will be 101 percent. Here's why. People already know a lot about the president. They don't know much about Mitt Romney. They know that President Obama killed Osama bin Laden. They don't know that Romney killed thousands of jobs all across America.

I want to tell that piece of the story and I -- I think you guys ought to keep us honest. I think the press ought to fact-check our ads. But when we take real people, put them on camera and tell their stories about what happened to their lives under Mitt Romney's economic politics, it's a pretty powerful stuff.

COOPER: Ari, when you look at the evidence over the last few months. These attacks on Bain, focused in swing states, do you think they're working?

ARI FLEISCHER, CNN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTOR: No, because if they were working, Mitt Romney wouldn't have cut the gap against Barack Obama. Look, see, the primaries, Mitt Romney was down by 5, 6, 7 points in most of the averages at the polls. Right now he's running virtually neck and neck.

So the president, not only has economic record he can't defend, he's not really running a very good campaign. He has spent almost $100 million on ads. They amount roughly -- he spent a lot of money on ads. As you just (INAUDIBLE). Negative ads against Mitt Romney.

Mitt Romney has run effective ads, he's got (INAUDIBLE). The reason is, in the cycle like this 2012, the voters are so focused on who can fix the economy, who can create jobs, who can reduce the deficit and the debt, they know the president can't. He's had four years to do it and he hasn't been able to. Even with an overwhelmingly almost Watergate sized Democratic Congress for his first two years.

And so this is one of those change elections. And the change this cycle is Mitt Romney. I also want to say that the Obama campaign end today would be the felony charge. This is Barack Obama's own birther movement against Mitt Romney.

COOPER: What do you mean by that?

FLEISCHER: I defended President Obama against the whole birther allegations that he was illegitimate, that he committed a crime by not being born here and running for president. And that is doing the same thing. They said was despicable against Mitt Romney.

Stephanie Cutter today repeated that charge today in an interview with Wolf Blitzer. That's the shame of this race. The 2012 Obama would not recognize the 2008 Obama.

COOPER: Paul, is it -- is this the Obama birther movement as Ari just said?

BEGALA: No, come on. I mean there's some people who think that Bill Clinton got a little --

(CROSSTALK)

FLEISCHER: A felony? A felony?

BEGALA: Just a second, Ari. There are some people may be think they got over their ski tips a little too far on this. But all they actually said, if you look what they said, is Mr. Romney and Bain Capital filed Securities and Exchange Commission documents that swore under oath that he was the president, CEO, chairman and sole owner of the company.

Then in 2011 Romney signed a personal financial disclosure form also under pain of perjury that said he had nothing to do with Bain Capital. During the same time that the other sworn document said that he was CEO and president and chairman. So one of those two documents seems to me inarguably to be wrong. And I think that that's probably where the argument should be.

I don't think Mitt Romney is a felon. I don't think that at all. But actually I think both those documents may well be in error. In other words, I don't think he was really running Bain Capital every single day while he was running the Olympics. But I also don't think he was completely wholly and totally divorced from it. And he swore both. That's the problem he's got.

COOPER: Now, Ari, his attorney had said that he returned multiple times to Massachusetts to attend board meetings and the like.

FLEISCHER: That doesn't mean he's running it or making the investment decisions. You know, when I went to the White House and when Paul went to the White House, we both have commissions -- signed commissions that gave us our White House jobs. They're signed not by the president but by the secretary of state. You don't work for the secretary of the state. The secretary of the state wasn't our boss. But he signed our commission.

(CROSSTALK)

BEGALA: And so did the president, Ari, that's -- by the way, the president signs it, too.

FLEISCHER: -- the lawyers' advice on how to comply with laws actually don't have a whole lot of relevance to what you might have to do in the private sector or even the public sector. Mitt Romney had to sign as the CEO, as the owner of the company because he owned the shares. The way it works is he didn't make the decisions because he indeed had left. Even if he owned the shares. That's the difference.

Anderson, what it really comes down to, you remember before there was an official with the Environmental Protection Agency who got fired because he spoke out and he said that their view is you take three people and you crucify the first three people in the business community that you come across? And nobody else -- you charge them with criminal charges. In effect crucify them, was his words. And then nobody else will even think about even messing with you.

That's the type of campaign the Obama campaign wants to run against Mitt Romney. These are the tactics they're employing. 2008 post-partisan. We need to rise above. Barack Obama, he's given up looking for work like everybody else in this economy. This is such a different candidate in 2012. He's just clinging to his job. I don't think it's going to work.

COOPER: Ari, do you -- sorry, Paul, do you think this is a different candidate?

BEGALA: Yes, it's a different election, absolutely. But, you know, it amuses me, I have to say, I'm an older man, I'm 51. When I was a kid, conservatives were tough. It was John Wayne and Ronald Reagan, and nobody said liberals were wimp, that was sort of my side, it's like Alan Alda and Mike Dukakis.

And I have to say I'm heartened if we've gone from toothless in Ari's eyes to ruthless. I'd rather be tough. These are tough times. And this is Romney's record. His sole calling card for the presidency is, I was a businessman, I was a CEO. And so we are taking a look at that record. And it is very good in some ways. But appalling in other ways.

COOPER: All right.

BEGALA: And Romney can't answer that. He can't defend the things he did. And that's his problem. COOPER: We got to -- we got to leave it there. Paul Begala, Ari Fleischer, guys, thank you very much.

Let us know what you think. We're on Facebook. Follow me right now on Twitter, @andersoncooper. I'm tweeting about this right now.

We're also "Keeping Them Honest" on Capitol Hill. Five members of Congress. I don't know if you've heard about this. Five members of Congress -- we're showing the pictures right there - have launched a campaign to, quote, "root out" what they call is Muslim extremists in the U.S. government. They say there's this massive infiltration. They're naming names including one of Hillary Clinton's top aides.

The question is what evidence, if any, do they actually have? And if they're really concerned about this alleged security threat, why are they making it so public? That's next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Welcome back. Tonight "Keeping Them Honest" in a move by Representative Michele Bachmann and four other Congress members that they say is a long overdue investigation of Muslim extremists infiltration of the U.S. government. Critics say it's nothing more than a politically motivated Muslim witch-hunt with shades of McCarthyism.

Bachmann and four of her Republican colleagues are demanding an investigation into potential infiltration by Muslim Brotherhood operatives intent on destroying western civilization into the highest levels of the United States government. And Bachmann, along with Representatives Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Thomas Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland, has sent letters to the inspectors general of the State Department, Justice Department, Defense Department, Homeland Security Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

They also made those letters very public. Now we're going to get to some of the big claims in those letters in just a moment. But first listen to what Bachmann said in a radio interview with the American Family Association's Sandy Rios.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. MICHELE BACHMANN (R), MINNESOTA: It appears that there has been deep penetration in the halls of our United States government by the Muslim Brother hood. The Muslim Brotherhood has been found to be an unindicted co-conspirator on terrorism cases. And yet it appears that there are individuals who are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood who have positions and very sensitive positions, in our Department of Justice, our Department of Homeland Security, potentially even in the National Intelligence Agency.

And I am calling upon the Justice Department and these various departments to investigate through the inspector general to see who these people are and what access they have to our information.

(END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Deep penetration. Those were her worlds. Now to the letters themselves, they are chockfull of claims, one being that in reaching out to the American Muslim community the Justice Department has been meeting with groups that could be, could be, fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood. Quote, "These groups also appear to have been afforded access to senior policymakers in the Justice Department and thereby been able to exercise influence in ways that align with Muslim Brotherhood agendas and that could prove detrimental to our national and homeland security."

In another letters, Bachmann and company accused three Homeland Security Department advisors of having, quote, "extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist organizations," and says that other DHS advisers, quote, "appear to share their sympathy for Islamist causes."

We'll tell you in a second where they get that theory from.

In yet another letter, Bachmann and her colleagues claimed that the State Department has taken actions that have been, quote, "enormously favorable to the Muslim Brotherhood and its interest. And they single out Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a top aide and the wife of former congressman, Anthony Weiner.

The letter states, quote, "The department's deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin has three family members -- her late father, her mother and her brother -- connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations. Her position affords her routine access to the secretary and to policymaking."

So the suggestion is that Abedin's loyalty should be called into question. They wonder how she even got a security clearance.

Now, at this point, you may be asking, where this group of representatives is actually getting its information. Well, "Keeping Them Honest," time and time again the letters cite the work of a group called the Center for Security Policy. Its Web site is MuslimbrotherhoodinAmerica.com. Now that group's head is someone we've had on the program before, a man named Frank Gaffney, who says the Muslim Brotherhood is infiltrating every aspect of American life in order to impose Sharia law.

Some -- his critics call him a conspiracy theorist. The Southern Poverty Law Center calls Gaffney, quote, "the anti-Muslim movement's most paranoid propagandist."

Bachmann's fellow representatives from Minnesota, Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison, wants some answers, too. In a letter to Bachmann and her colleagues, Ellison knows that Gaffney's views have been widely discredit and says he wants to see credible evidence for the allegations made in the letters.

In response to Ellison, Bachmann defends the letters and repeats her view that a multidepartment investigation into potential Muslim Brotherhood infiltration into the U.S. government is not only necessary but, quote, "beyond timely."

We of course invited Representative Bachmann and the other four congressmen who signed the letters to come on the program tonight. They all either declined or did not respond to our request. Our invitation stands.

Joining me now are James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute and author of "Our Voices." And Alex Seitz-Wald, a staff writer for Salon.com.

Alex, Michele Bachmann's response to Keith Ellison, I mean I read it and I got to say the things she cites as evidence to support her claim seem so tenuous or tangential that it doesn't really make -- to me, there's not really much evidence there at all. I know you've been digging into this. Do you see validity to the claims that she's making about these deep penetration?

ALEX SEITZ-WALD, STAFF WRITER, SALON.COM: No, absolutely not. I mean this letter was supposed to spell out the evidence that she had. And it leaves us with more questions than the original claims make. For example, against Huma Abedin, the deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton. In order to connect her to the Muslim Brotherhood, you have to go through her dead father to an organization he started in Saudi Arabia, to a guy who supposedly supported him, to the organization that that guy was the head of. To Europe in the 1970s when his organization was supposedly connected to the Muslim Brotherhood.

So I mean these claims are just completely outrageous and there's absolutely nothing to back them up.

On the Abedin case, she's basically having you -- in order to believe her, you have to expect that she knows more than, say, the CIA or the FBI, who approved Huma Abedin's security clearance. Not to mention that Huma Abedin is married to one of the most pro-Israel former lawmakers around. So, I mean, you know, the leaps that you would have to get to here probably wouldn't even fit on Glenn Beck's blackboard.

COOPER: And -- I mean, Alex, the thing I also don't understand is if you really believe that there is a massive security threat in the highest reaches of government, you don't make that public. There are ways for people in Congress to launch investigations or ask security agencies to launch investigations without going on some radio show. I mean, is this about politics or is this really you think a concern about security?

SEITZ-WALD: Yes, I mean, the fact that we're even talking about it right now should underscore how ridiculous this witch-hunt is. And that's exactly what it is. She wrote these letters and she immediately put them on her Web site. You can go right now and see them. They're completely public. She sent them to the local newspapers. And then she went on this right-wing radio show.

You would think if you're trying to root out secret infiltrators, you're not going to tip them off by telling the entire world that you're after them. I mean anybody who's -- you know, knows anything but -- would see that. So this is clearly just a basic media ploy. I mean this is exactly what she does. Her presidential campaign has failed. It's the doldrums of the summer. And she's trying to grab some headlines. You know this is classic Michele Bachmann.

But unlike a lot of other claims, unlike saying that the Census data will be used to create interment camps, this has real consequences. I mean she's going after real people here whose lives and careers could be potentially ruined or damaged because she's trying to get -- stay relevant for her political career.

COOPER: Jim, it's also painting with a very broad brush hundreds of millions of people. Billions of people around the world as potential threats to the United States. I mean, it's -- it's going against the very, you know, security interests of the United States. We're fighting wars in support of some Muslim governments against extremism.

JAMES ZOGBY, PRESIDENT, ARAB AMERICAN INSTITUTE: More than that, Anderson, it's a threat to the millions of American Muslims. Look, I've been through this myself in my own life and my family's been through it when we've been attacked unfairly by some of the very same cast of characters.

It hurts. And so I'm thinking right now of those young Muslims working in the State Department or working at the Justice Department. Or, you know, getting out of college and wanting a career serving their country. And being told by these members of Congress that you're a threat and we'll keep our eyes on you.

And so the damage this does is not only to America abroad but it does profound damage to the notion of America as a inclusive and absorptive society that becomes one with many people from all over the world. Sharing an identity and sharing a set of goals. That's what this president has tried to do. That's what Michele Bachmann and company are trying to tear down.

And don't mistake it for one minute. This has a lot to do with Barack Obama. This campaign is an effort to paint Muslims -- and by implication, Barack Obama who they still believe is a closet Muslim. Somehow with suspicious. That's why Huma, that's why Rashad Hussein, a wonderful young man, an attorney who's our special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Countries, are being portrayed individually.

These --

(CROSSTALK)

ZOGBY: You can find outstanding people --

COOPER: Even George --

ZOGBY: -- but they're being discredited.

COOPER: Even George W. Bush is kind on -- aspersions are cast on him for pointing somebody to -- a lawmaker organization. As if that is somehow in itself, you know, questionable. At a time when this government is trying to get more Arab speakers to work in security agencies, it just seems like this goes against the best interest of the security of the United States.

ZOGBY: Sure it does. Look, I was in Washington during that period. I know the Bush administration made a real effort to do it, but these guys did not attack it then.

They're attacking it now because of Barack Obama. Now it's become a political wedge issue. That's why we had the mosque issue in 2010.

That's why we had the birther movement. That's why we've got the loyalty oath and this stuff going on now. It's sad. It's dangerous, but it's also very hurtful to a lot of American-Muslims.

COOPER: We -- obviously, the invitation stands to have any of these Congress people on. We had Louie Gohmert during his whole terror baby conspiracy theory and he basically ended up screaming at me. But we'd welcome him to come again. James, appreciate it. Got to leave it there. Thank you.

A new mom gives birth to twins, but then spends months in the hospital battling flesh eating bacteria. The story's extraordinary. She's about to go home for the first time since her ordeal began. Our interview with her is next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Mystery in Iowa, two girls, cousins, went out on their bikes on Friday and have vanished in to thin air it seems. Their bikes have been found, but there is no sign of the kids. Thousands of people are searching for them. We'll speak to the mom of one of the girls ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Welcome back. A new mom, Lana Kuykendall of South Carolina is preparing for homecoming that some feared would never happen. Days after she gave birth to twins, she received a terrifying diagnosis. Her body was under attack by what's known as flesh eating bacteria.

It's started a medical ordeal that forced her to undergo more than 20 operations, spent weeks in rehabs and leave newborns, Ian and Abegail, in the care of family and friends.

Now her doctors say she's finally ready to go home. It's an extraordinary story. CNN senior medical correspondent, Elizabeth Cohen is live in Greenville, South Carolina.

She spoke with Lana Kuykendall. Elizabeth, this story is just remarkable. Take me through what happened to Lana. Just home from giving birth, noticed a spot on the back of her leg. Then what?

ELIZABETH COHEN, CNN SENIOR MEDICAL CORRESPONDENT: Right. She noticed a spot. The way she described it, Anderson, is that it was actually more of a line like a strip is how she described it.

Now Lana is a nurse and she's also a paramedic. She knew something strange was going on. She showed it to her husband, Darren, who actually is also an EMT. I spoke with Darren yesterday and here's what he had to say.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DARREN KUYKENDALL, HUSBAND OF FLESH EATING VICTIM: I was terrified, first of all and I couldn't get my thoughts together. I've tried to figure out what to do next.

And I just knew it was going to be -- I knew from our friend, from the past, that was, you know, some bad stuff, just really bad. It moves very quickly.

And, you know, time is of the essence and you have to -- the surgeons have to be able to recognize it and take care of it. There's no sitting around and reading books and trying to figure out what it is.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COHEN: Darren said that the surgeons actually outlined the blue marks on his wife's skin and he watched it grow. It grew about a quarter of an inch in 20 minutes -- Anderson.

COOPER: Wow. That's extraordinary, 20 minutes. She likely would not be here if she and her husband hadn't acted so quickly, right? I mean, why was it so critical that she get medical attention right away?

COHEN: Right, because it moves so quickly, what it does is, it produces toxins in the body and the kidneys and other organs cannot deal with those toxins.

So if they had waited maybe even a matter of hours or certainly days, you know, she might not be here. The doctors today, Anderson, at the press conference were so clear. They said the reason she's here today is because she and her husband are smart.

COOPER: Smart indeed. What have the last two months been like for her? You talked to her?

COHEN: That's right, I did talk to her. I was so inspired by her. I mean, she really has been actually so positive about the experience. But she did tell me that there have been some tough moments.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LANA KUYKENDALL, INFECTED WITH FLESH EATING BACTERIA: Sometimes I cry over, you know, the fact that I'm sick. Sometimes I cry over missing the babies. Sometimes I've cried over knowing that life will never be like, I guess, I'd always thought it would be. But it will still be a good life. (END VIDEO CLIP)

COHEN: You know, Lana and her doctors told us that, you know what they'll probably never know what caused the infection. But she could have had just some tiny cut in her leg and the bacteria could have gotten in that way -- Anderson.

COOPER: That's so scary. Elizabeth Cohen, appreciate it. Thanks.

We are following a number of other stories right now. Susan Hendricks is here with the "360 Bulletin" -- Susan.

SUSAN HENDRICKS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Hi, Anderson. Syria's capital's bracing for battle. There are reports of clashes in Damascus. Activists posted videos that appear to show vehicles burning there. The Syrian government moved tanks on to the streets of the capital. All this comes as the Red Cross declares Syria in a state of civil war.

In the U.S., the National Climatic Data Center says the drought gripping more than half of the country is now the largest since the '50s. The southern and central Rockies along with much of the plain states in the Ohio Valley are seeing the worst of that drought.

In Canada, the problem is too much water. Authorities believe a backed-up creek caused this mudslide. Take a look. It sent a wall of debris and water just flowing. No reports, though, Anderson, of any injuries.

COOPER: Susan, thanks. A desperate search going on right now in Iowa for days now, two young cousins disappeared while out on a bike ride. Nearly 1,000 volunteers helped look for clues over the weekend. We're going to hear from mother of one of the missing girls next on 360.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Sewing needles found in sandwiches aboard four separate Delta Airlines flights. We have details on that coming up.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Now to the latest on a massive search for two missing girls in Iowa. The 8-year-old Elizabeth Collins and 10-year-old Lyric Cook disappeared on Friday. The two are cousins.

They were last seen riding their bicycles by their grandmother. The bikes turned up hours later, but there are still no signs of the girls.

Nearly 1,000 volunteers joined local police and FBI over the weekend in the search. Police have called off the volunteer effort for now, but say law enforcement is working to bring the girls home.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) CHIEF DEPUTY RICHARD ABBEN, BLACK HAWK COUNTY, IOWA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: The focus today is to get these two girls back. That's what we want. We just want these girls back and so that's what the focus is to get them back safe and sound.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Joining me now, Lyric's mom, Misty Cook Morrissey and Tommy Brouseau, who is the aunt of both girls. Misty, how did you find out that your daughter, your niece were missing?

MISTY COOK-MORRISSEY, MOTHER OF MISSING GIRL: I was getting off work at 2:00. My mom gave a call on the cell phone to let me know, the girls haven't been back from their bike ride. Why don't you drive right over here and we'll continue to look for them.

My mom had some plans for the night so I drove over. We looked for them, couldn't find them, went to the police station. When the police found the bikes, that's kind of when it got serious and we realized it was more than just them off playing.

COOPER: The girls bikes were found down by a lake. Was that an area that they went to a lot? Did they know the area?

MORRISSEY: From my understanding, they do not know the area. Maybe Elizabeth and some friends had ridden down there at one time --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: One time.

MORRISSEY: But no, it's not an area that they frequented. They didn't go far from home, either of the girls. They mainly stayed around the Evansdale area that my sister lives in. So it's just not, kind of, like them to go that far.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Definitely out of their character.

MORRISSEY: Again, they're 10 and 8. So I don't put it past them to have chosen to maybe go a little further as, you know, they're children so -- but not in our estimate did we think they would go that far.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No.

COOPER: And obviously we're putting their picture up --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: This is not in their character to go that far.

COOPER: We're putting their picture up as much as possible. Hopefully somebody will have seen them or spotted them. Tammy, you told reporters earlier that you taught your niece about staying away from strangers.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Absolutely. I taught both Elizabeth and my daughter, I have a daughter, Calley, 11, who's very close to Elizabeth and Lyric. I've taught them, you know, if you're approached and somebody actually grabs hold of you, drop your body to the ground. Scream, kick, fight, gouge eyes. Do whatever you have to do. Don't let them get you to a vehicle.

You know, I told the girls, you know, once you're in a vehicle, the chances decrease of your survival. And so I have a feeling whoever approached them had some type of weapon, something that scared them very, very badly that made them get into a vehicle. Yes.

COOPER: And the police gave you both polygraphs, is that correct? What was that process like to have gone through that?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I have not done a polygraph yet. I am more than willing to. I don't believe Misty has.

MORRISSEY: No, no, I did my polygraph this morning.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Misty did do hers.

MORRISSEY: The process was long in a very small room. So it was kind of claustrophobic, but it was a very necessary measure to eliminate and rule out family members.

I'm not familiar with the polygraph so it was a very new process for me. But, you know, it went fine. It went smoothly. We're done with it. I'm glad to be done with it.

I'm glad to be outside, being back involved with looking. Taking steps to, you know, helping. It's kind of hard to be closed up in a room where you feel like you're not being part of the search. So the polygraph went fine.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Anderson, just so you know, all family members on, you know, Misty's side and the Collins' side, Elizabeth's parents, family members, everybody is willing to do a polygraph test, you know. We just want our girls' home, you know?

COOPER: Yes, well, you've had --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We're cooperating -- to the fullest.

COOPER: You've had an outpouring of support. More than 1,000 people took part in searches over the weekend. Misty, what do you want people --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: That's correct.

COOPER: -- to know about your daughter, about your niece? What do you want people to know about them?

MORRISSEY: I want people to know that Lyric and Elizabeth are beautiful. We are a God-centered family. So my niece and my daughter are --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Their very fun loving. MORRISSEY: They're spiritually girls who love the Lord.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: They're very outgoing, talkative.

MORRISSEY: They're very sweet. They're fun. They smile a lot. They're pretty persistent in the things that they want. They're great. They're really great. You know what I mean?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes, they are.

MORRISSEY: We really look forward to what they had to offer in their future and the life that God had for them. And we still are looking forward to something like that, yes.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We're bracing for the worst, but hoping for the best.

COOPER: Yes, well, you know, there's always hope, and Misty and Tammy, I wish you -- I wish you all the best. Continue praying for you and thinking about you. As you know, many people around the country and the world are right now. So thank you very much for being with us.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Anderson, thank you.

MORRISSEY: Yes, thank you.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Thank you so much. Thank you so much.

COOPER: So strong.

Something dangerous found inside sandwiches served on four separate Delta Airlines flights. Plus how a Texas man found his car more than four decades after it was stolen next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Let's check back in with Susan Hendricks. She has a "360 Bulletin" -- Susan.

HENDRICKS: Anderson, a terrible story here. Three teenagers in Chicago are charged in the beating death of the 62-year-old Delfino Morra. He was collecting cans to make extra money when he was attacked. Authorities say the teen's videotaped the beating and posted the video on Facebook. That is what led to their arrest.

Delta Airlines says that sewing needles were found inside of four sandwiches on four separate flights from Amsterdam to the U.S. All the sandwiches were made at the same facility in Amsterdam. Delta says it is cooperating with the FBI and local Dutch authorities.

And a Texas man whose car was stolen 42 years ago has finally gotten it back. It's a 1967 Austin-Healy sports car. Over the years, Robert Russell would scour the internet to see if anyone tried to sell it. He finally traced it to a dealership, Anderson, in Los Angeles.

COOPER: Wow, nice car. Glad he got it back. Susan, thanks.

So who would dare to pull the plug on a damage session between the boss and a Beatle? It happened. "The Ridiculist" is next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Time now for "The Ridiculist." Tonight we're adding curfews. I don't mean all curfews. Some of them are perfectly acceptable. Like for instance the curfews that keep teenagers from ruling the night and brawling gangs like those kids in "Children of the Corn." Those are perfectly acceptable curfews, but then there are others.

Like the ones that literally pull the plug on rock history. That's exactly what happened over the weekend in London's Hyde Park. Bruce Springsteen was headlining a rock festival. The boss did one of those legendary three-hour set and then a guest came on the stage. Perhaps you've heard of him. One Sir Paul McCartney, a little band called "The Beatles."

Springsteen and McCartney jamming together on stage, two rock icons and it seemed like there was going to be an extended medley of Beatles songs. Then suddenly the promoter pulled the plug. Why?

Because it was 10 minutes after the 10:30 p.m. noise curfew in Hyde Park. Springsteen tries to say something to the crowd, but the mics were cut off. Look, I get people that live around Hyde Park and the city council, they have to take them to account.

But come on, it's not like it's a neighborhood garage band doing some 2:00 a.m. jam session at 120 decibels. You're talking about Springsteen and McCartney at 10:30 p.m. on a Saturday night.

Furthermore, if anyone within ear shot was so desperate to get some sleep, need I remind you that a Springsteen concert can be quite soothing and relaxing just ask New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Someone took this picture of him in a Springsteen concert at Madison Square Garden. He reportedly said he was grooving, not sleeping, but still does that look like a man with a noise complaint?

In fact, London's "Evening Standard" reports the local council only received one noise complaint during the Springsteen set. One, I think Springsteen guitarist said it best really got to the bottom line.

The quote when I'm jamming with McCartney, don't bug me. Words to live by on "The Ridiculist."

That does it for us. We'll see you again one hour from now another edition of 360 at 10 p.m. Eastern.