Return to Transcripts main page

Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees

Treasury Sued Over Giving Musk's DOGE Access to Payment Data; Interview with Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL); Deconstruction Project; Senior FBI Leaders Ordered To Retire, Resign Or Be Fired; DOJ Orders FBI To Hand Over Names Of All Officials Who Worked On Jan. 6 Riot Cases By Tomorrow; Recovery Begins Of Plane Wreckage From Potomac River. Aired 8-9p ET

Aired February 03, 2025 - 20:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


PETE MUNTEAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: ... is going back in time to essentially recreate a history of the pilot's last few days leading up to the tragedy here. But the bottom line from investigators, it's much too soon to speculate on the cause and a lot of factors at play here -- Erin.

ERIN BURNETT, CNN HOST: All right, Pete, thank you very much.

Incredible, though they tried to pull up in that last second with the speeds here, they would have needed a whole lot more for this to have ended as a near-miss.

Thank you so much, Pete.

And thanks to all of you for joining us, AC360 starts now.

[20:00:28]

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN HOST, "ANDERSON COOPER: 360": Tonight on 360, breaking news, a new lawsuit trying to stop the president and Elon Musk from being able to shut off any federal payments they want, whenever they want to, whomever they want, including you.

Also tonight, what do you do with a guy you fired for hanging out with White nationalists and once said, "Competent White men must be in charge if you want things to work" Well, tonight we learned he's been hired back.

And the latest on that purge of the FBI. A deadline tomorrow that could impact anyone who had anything to do with investigating January 6th.

Good evening. Thanks for joining us.

We begin tonight with breaking news. The first legal pushback to President Trump and Elon Musk's effort to seize control of the federal government's checkbook.

Late today, three union and advocacy groups sued the Treasury Department and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent over the decision giving Musk and his staffers access to the federal payment system. That's the -- up until now -- nonpartisan arm of the Treasury that writes and sends out trillions of dollars a year that the federal government spends on everything from mine safety to Medicare.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA): I just want to be clear about what's going on here. The system that makes sure that your granddad gets his Social Security check, the system that makes sure that your mom's doctor gets Medicare payment to cover her medical appointment, and the system that makes sure that you get the tax refund that you're owed has been taken over by Elon Musk

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, to the extent that it's a takeover, and we'll talk about that with our guest tonight, one thing is clear it's happening with the new Treasury Secretary's permission on the presidents orders.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REPORTER: Mr. President, why is it important for Elon Musk to have access to the payment systems at Treasury?

DONALD TRUMP (R) PRESIDENT-ELECT OF THE UNITED STATES: Well, he's got access only to letting people go that he thinks are no good. If we agree with him and it's only if we agree with him. He's a very talented guy from the standpoint of management and costs, and we put him in charge of seeing what he can do with certain groups and certain numbers.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, the question is which groups and what numbers, and how is it that money authorized and appropriated by Congress and written into legislation can be shut off, item by item, by the president or even one of his unelected employees. And who knows who else is working for Elon Musk.

Over the years, federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have rejected attempts by presidents to not spend the money that Congress has provided. And in 1974, Congress passed a law drastically limiting the circumstances under which a president can do so.

Now, what this president seems to be doing is preparing to stop the spending by not actually writing the checks, which is certainly easier than what presidents in both parties have traditionally tried to do, which is proposing budget cutting legislation, selling it to the public, and getting Congress to agree.

Now, doing that is obviously hard. It takes time because people often like the idea of cuts more than they actually like the specifics. This process, though, if that's the aim, cuts the public in their elected representative right out of the loop. It puts the onus on anyone who might be affected, which could number in the millions to try and stop it after the fact, which seems to be what's going on with the US Agency for International Development, USAID.

Over the weekend, Elon Musk posted this about it, "USAID is a criminal organization, time for it to die."

Now, to be clear, USAID is or was the federal organization responsible for delivering billions of dollars in humanitarian aid all over the world? It was set up during the Kennedy administration, authorized and funded by Congress.

Musk today also had this to say about it, quoting again, "USAID is was a radical-left political psy op."

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MARCO RUBIO, SECRETARY OF STATE: It has to be aligned with American foreign policy. USAID has a history of sort of ignoring that and deciding that there's somehow a global charity separate from the national interest, these are taxpayer dollars.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, that's Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was named the agency's acting administrator -- USAID acting administrator and said some of his functions would be absorbed by the State Department, he gave as a reason -- insubordination.

It's a congressionally created and funded agency, making it legally problematic for a president to unilaterally dismantle, according to CNN Supreme Court analyst Stephen Vladeck. According to President Trump, he doesn't need Congress at all.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: Not when it comes to fraud. If there's fraud, these people are lunatics.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

COOPER: Well, he has not presented any evidence of fraud or lunacy, for that matter. There is ample evidence, though, that this is how the president plans to operate, namely by taking unilateral action and forcing his opponents to try and stop him.

Now, since we left you Friday night, the president has launched a purge of the FBI's top leadership and given the bureau until tomorrow to provide the Justice Department information about all current and former bureau employees who at any time worked on January 6th investigations, which was their tasked assignment at the time. They were doing their jobs.

[20:05:17]

We also learned late today that dozens of employees at the Education Department have been put on paid administrative leave. Two sources tell CNN, that as part of the administration's effort to rid the federal workforce of people involved in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. The irony, their union president tells CNN that the employees placed on paid leave had attended a two-day diversity training seminar in 2019, during the first Trump administration.

So, will that or the FBI firings, the USAID shutdown, or any of the other unilateral moves by the president and his team actually pass legal muster. One thing seems clear, this administration is determined to act first and defend it if they need to, later.

More on all of this now, starting with CNN's Kaitlan Collins. So, what is known about the people working with Musk on all of this? I mean, who are these people that now have access to all this proprietary financial information?

KAITLAN COLLINS, CNN ANCHOR AND CHIEF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: We don't totally have a full picture of that, Anderson. We know there's a lot of young Silicon Valley engineers and people from that world of Elon Musk's that are here helping him carry out DOGE that are working on this project with them.

It seemed to be about 12 people initially, two weeks ago when they first took office, and DOGE was getting underway and, and kind of getting a look at all these agencies. It's not totally clear to us if that picture has grown and what that looks like, because we did learn today that Elon Musk is classified as what's known as a Special Government Employee, an SGE.

Those we've seen in the Biden administration, Trump administration, round one, obviously, he's unique in this role because he's someone who has massive federal contracts. He already had a security clearance. I'm told it's a top secret security clearance by an official that is kind of leading him in this situation.

But the question that we had today for the White House, and one we haven't gotten clarity on yet, a ton of clarity, is whether or not those who are working with him and the other people in his allies who were also working to get access to that Treasury payment system this weekend, whether or not they have security clearances or what exactly that looks like.

We don't have a full list of those names and that system for people who don't know, it disperses all the trillions of dollars that the federal government pays out. And typically, for that reason, given how sensitive the information is and how critical it is, it's a pretty close hold situation.

And so, this top Treasury employee who had been at the Treasury Department for years and was there in the Trump administration round one, actually was pushed aside as a result of this. He retired early on Friday because he was blocking the access to that.

We saw that also play out at USAID this weekend, where officials went in and were demanding access to the systems there, and initially were people resisted giving it to them because it wasn't totally clear who they were. And then in the end, they ended up gaining access to that.

And so, that is something here that's happening where there isn't total oversight exactly, of who is doing what. But certainly what is clear is Elon Musk seems to have a pretty big purview here in terms of which agencies he's getting access to and what kind of systems as well, not just him, but also those who are working with him.

COOPER: And it seems like this White House strategy is kind of a continuation of, I guess, what they would sort of refer to as the shock and awe approach.

Collins: Yes, I think so. I think Trump agrees with a lot of what Elon Musk is doing. You heard him defending the USAID stuff. I'll note that is a break from what he did in his first term in office. He was critical of the agency, but in his 2020 budget, he actually asked for more money for them because it was something that Ivanka Trump worked very closely on.

And so, to see this kind of 180 here, in terms of how it's being essentially dismantled in this purview and, you know, Secretary of State, Marco Rubio is asking for reviews of the spending here. It's not even totally clear what else spending they're going to be reviewing, because so much of it has been frozen.

And so, yes, Trump is certainly on board with it. I did think it was notable, though, in the Oval today when we were hearing Trump being asked about what Elon Musk has access to, what his purview is when it comes to the Treasury payment system, as Trump was saying, that he can do what's appropriate and that they agree on. But he did say if there is a conflict, we will stop that and essentially arguing that because as an SGE, Elon musk is subject to this statute where there are conflict of interest rules here, that if you benefit financially from something, you're not supposed to be working on that.

The question there is, who has oversight of Elon Musk? And that is not clear either.

COOPER: Yes, Kaitlan Collins, thanks very much. We'll see you at the top of the hour for "The Source."

Joining us right now is Illinois Democratic Congresswoman Tammy Duckworth, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

I'm wondering what your reaction is, first of all, just to the scope, the pace of changes that Trump and Elon Musk are making to the federal government.

SEN. TAMMY DUCKWORTH (D-IL): Well, they're trying to overwhelm us in order to slide through a lot of the really toxic programs that they're trying for. And the fact of the matter is, you know, Elon Musk is in the US Treasury. That amount of data that is staggering to the American people. And the fact of the matter is, they're in the system, Elon Musk is in, which means that even if we get him out, we have no idea if he has put backdoors into all of these programs.

And as far as USAID is concerned, and State Department, this is about our National Security. These programs are funded in order to ensure America's National Security and it's quite terrifying to me that you've got somebody like Elon Musk, who's not been elected by the American people, hasn't been vetted by the United States Senate, is in there having access to all of these this financial instruments.

COOPER: You voted to confirm Marco Rubio as Secretary of State. He's now, I guess, acting USAID administrator. What do you think that's going to look like under his leadership? Why do you think USAID matters?

[20:10:42]

DUCKWORTH: Well, let me answer that second question first, and I'm going to do it by quoting Ronald Reagan. And he said, and I quote, "The ultimate importance to the United States of our security and development assistance programs cannot be exaggerated." That's Ronald Reagan who talked about peace through security, was about the military, but also about the aid programs are critically important to America's National Security.

I am deeply, deeply disappointed in Marco Rubio. We met with him prior to the vote and asked him about the freeze that would come to USAID programs, and he reassured the members of the committee that, you know, that it would be turned back on and that babies would not die, medicine would not be prevented from being distributed. But that's exactly what's happening right now. We are going to have a humanitarian crisis on our hands as a result of this funding cut.

COOPER: Why do you think it is that Elon Musk has become so fixated on USAID, saying it's a left-wing psy op, that it's a criminal organization?

DUCKWORTH: I think this is just a money grab. This is all about them trying to find ways to fund their billionaire tax cuts and this is one way that they can do it. This is really a power play.

I can't get in -- I don't understand the head of Elon Musk. I don't want to try to get into his head. I mean, this is a guy who made two, how Hitler salutes recently. And it's terrifying to me that the president of the United States has given this guy access to your data, my data, all American's financial data.

You know, this is not someone that I think should be trusted with access to the US Treasury data files or to the State Department.

COOPER: As you know, the president suggested that DEI, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion may have played a role in last week's tragic air crash in Washington. I guess he was talking about the controllers. I'm not sure exactly whom. Countless government websites have been taken down or scrubbed of information and language. The new administration has declared taboo.

I mean, do Democrats have any recourse? I mean, it doesn't seem like, I mean, there's obviously a lack of leadership in the Democratic Party.

DUCKWORTH: Well, I think that were taking a multi-pronged approach. You see, our governors and our attorneys generals filing the lawsuits, that's the first step. And I have been in contact with both my attorney general, mayor of Chicago, as well as the governor of Illinois in our efforts to push back from the states, because that's who can file those lawsuits.

At the United States Senate where I sit, I've already started voting no on all of the Trump nominees. And we are starting now to make sure that we push back as hard as we can to prevent the Trump agenda from moving forward.

We will be introducing some legislation as well. So, this is something we have to come at from all levels. And the other thing that we can do is talk to our constituents, talk to the folks out there and say, hey, if you're being affected by this, if you start to not get your Social Security money, if you are, you know, one of these programs that's helping refugees and suddenly the funding is cut off.

If your child's Medicaid program gets cut off because the portal is shut down, you need to make sure that you let people know. Because the only way that we can fight back is through unity in our action.

Yes, the Democratic Party, yes, Democrats are going to be leading the fight on this. But this is also at all levels of government. We have to push back and we can't just roll over for Donald Trump and his cronies.

COOPER: Senator Duckworth, I appreciate it. Thank you.

Coming up next, the former Trump speechwriter who was fired in 2018 after CNN revealed he spoke at a conference attended by White nationalists or better known today, is better known today as the administration's newest State Department spokesman. He got rehired .

Later, what thousands of FBI personnel are facing tonight and their uncertain future ahead simply for taking part in the January 6th investigation, that's ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:18:45]

COOPER: I'm going to tell you about one of the Trump administration's new hires. His name is Darren Beatty, and his name may be familiar because back in 2018, he was fired from the first Trump administration after CNN revealed he spoke at a conference attended by White nationalists.

Beatty has also made a series of racially charged comments, writing in one tweet last year, "Competent White men must be in charge if you want things to work." -- Darren Beatty.

Now, he's been appointed to serve as the acting Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. Neither Beatty nor the State Department immediately provided comment. State Department did not say whether the administration intends to nominate Beatty for the position beyond the acting role.

Joining us now, CNN political commentators Van Jones, Alyssa Farah Griffin; also GOP media consultant and strategist Brad Todd.

Alyssa, does it make sense that they hired this guy or rehired him?

ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: I think it underscores how different Trump 2.0 and the second term will be than the first. And what I mean by that is, I think that there are many Americans who voted for Trump this time because they wanted what they got four years he was in office before. But this is already gearing up to be a very different administration.

And somebody who was considered persona non-grata and was fired in 2018 when these things came to light, is now in an acting undersecretary role. A position that was previously held. I would note, by two qualified women in the first Trump term. And of course, will be serving under a Cuban-American Secretary of State, despite his comments about White men being in charge.

I think it simply shows that a lot of sort of the checks and credentials you would go through the first time around and that there were folks in the administration who would have, you know, raised alarm bells about that. That's just not where we are. Trump is going to get who he wants, where he it.

[20:20:21]

COOPER: Yes. I mean, DEI is out, but I mean Diversity, Equity, I guess, this is inclusion of a White nationalist former speaker to a White nationalist group.

VAN JONES, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: Yes, look, I mean, this is a shameless and despicable and it really, you know, they are saying they only want quality. We've got to go with quality. We've got to go with excellence. And then they bring in people out of the trash can. They just go drag out horrible people who you wouldn't hire to run a bodega and put them in the highest positions.

And so, it's the gaslighting of Americans, attacking Black people, attacking Brown people, saying we're not good enough. And then they go get the worst people ever born and put them in high positions.

And so, at some point, I think right now, Americans are just shocked. People are saying, where are the protests? I think people are literally just shocked and can't believe it and are having a hard time processing it.

But at some point you piss off enough people, you fire enough people, you pull the rug out from enough people, you shut down enough programs and you start building up a big bank of people who are pissed off and that is going to come.

COOPER: Brad, I mean, does it make sense to you that you would rehire this guy if they fired him the first time?

BRAD TODD, GOP MEDIA CONSULTANT AND STRATEGIST: Well, I don't know Mr. Beatty. I don't really know much about him other than a bunch of tweets, and none of which I like. The ones that I've seen, anyway. I don't think from just reading those that he'll be confirmable for a long-term position, and I think his appointment, or at least it coming to light, is overshadowing what's a pretty big week for Marco Rubio as he makes his first trip to Central America and is really having a great deal of success.

He had a great success in Panama, and now he's moved on to the triangle countries and Donald Trump, his tariff threat that everyone freaked out about just 24 hours ago, seemingly has brought Mexico and Canada to the table to achieve his foreign policy goals. So, it's unfortunate there's this distraction today.

COOPER: What do you think is the big achievement on Canada was here?

TODD: Well, I think, you know, tariffs are useful especially in the short term to pull people into a longer term --

COOPER: Are you just saying it's a negotiating tactic here?

TODD: Well, it often is. It often is unless the negotiations don't succeed. And then it can become a longer term thing. I think in the case of Canada, it probably is a negotiating tactic.

In the case of Mexico, you know, we have to get their attention. We cannot do what we have to do on immigration without full cooperation and effort by the government of Mexico. It is essential that they crack down on the cartels, and it is essential that Canada crack down on the cartels as well as they've tried to move some of their operations there.

So, I think this is off to a good start and I think it's this other news is overshadowing it today.

COOPER: Alyssa, the shutting down of USAID, I mean, these are whatever, you know, it's not a huge part of the budget, but in terms of its influence overseas, the goodwill it engenders among a lot of people, that's been one of the big criticisms of it.

GRIFFIN: There's a lot we still need to learn more about. And I'll say this, conservatives, Republicans for a long time have been for cutting waste, fraud, abuse, looking into federal programs, looking at how we can streamline and shrink them. But I'm not sure that that is what this is.

Senator Bill Cassidy, a Republican, put out a statement saying he was essentially he was unclear on whether PEPFAR was still receiving funds, one of the single most successful humanitarian organizations.

COOPER: Unless I heard that PEPFAR computer programs had been shut down. And so, lifesaving HIV medication, which was actually even on the shelves in clinics overseas can't even be distributed.

GRIFFIN: So, when you have somebody who sits on the Health Committee in the Senate not knowing basic information, that's very concerning, but more on America's global standing. The reason we have alliances, we have relationships, we have international aid is because we are the global superpower, and we want to be countering China.

If we pull out the rug from these allies, we pull back all our international aid, China will step into the void there. So, for the successes that Brad points out, which I to some degree agree with, this is playing a very dangerous game that's opening territory for China to come and swoop in.

COOPER: Van.

JONES: Look, it's terrible, first of all --

TODD: Alyssa, today --

COOPER: Hold on, Van is talking --

JONES: We can brag on Marco Rubio, I'd be happy to do it. But I'm going to tell you right now, people are going to die in very large numbers around the world who are expecting the United States to live up to our promises, to get them medicine, to get them help. And when that happens, people are going to remember that.

There are people right now who have HIV, who are alive only because the United States is making sure of that.

Donald Trump says, we don't care. You go die. That's the message from the United States government. It is the wrong message to be sending, and it opens up the door for China and other people to say, at least were a stable government who's not going to leave you out here to die. That's what -- this is not an abstract conversation for people around the world.

TODD: That's not, no Van, today, Marco Rubio wrote Congressional leaders to explain their moves on USAID and why they're moving it to the State Department --

COOPER: No he specifically talking about HIV medication and PEPFAR.

TODD: Well, hold on just a second. The goal is to make sure the programs and the people administering them aligned with US foreign policy goals. You know, we started USAID in 1961 as a way to counter the Soviet Union's influence. Today, we need to use it to counter the Belt and Road initiative is China --

[20:25:22]

COOPER: But PEPFAR, which is what Van was talking about, was actually started by George W. Bush, and it saved 25 million lives over it. Since that time --

TODD: Yes, correct, PEPFAR is a great program, but there's no reason it shouldn't be run directly out of the State Department --

COOPER: But if the Medicaid -- let me just -- do you know anything about HIV medication? Because if you stop HIV medication, the virus flares back and it mutates. So, if you have millions of people who are dependent on HIV medication --

TODD: I am not arguing against PEPFAR.

COOPER: Well, you seem to be because you're avoiding answering any questions about it.

TODD: No I'm not.

COOPER: Well, if its shut down, do you think that's wise?

TODD: No, of course, it's not wise. I'm not arguing its PEPFAR. I'm arguing that you can administer that out of the State Department, and we can make sure that all those programs align with our foreign policy goals that's the objective here.

GRIFFIN: But I think the concern, by the way, is when senior senators can't get basic answers on, is PEPFAR still funded? What is getting out to where we've made commitments and folding it to State, I don't think is a major issue that people have. It's more what is actually where funding -- where is funding being stopped? Where are we not living up to our country?

COOPER: If the whole thing is -- let's hold everything for 90 days, let's reorganize and who knows how long 90 days morphs into with something like PEPFAR, the drugs don't -- the virus doesn't work that way.

JONES: There's a smart way and a dumb way to do anything. I'm all for dealing with waste, fraud, and abuse. But when you just jerk the rug out from under, literally millions of people around the world who are sick and who are dying, that is a dumb way to do it, it's the wrong way to do it and there will be long term consequences.

GRIFFIN: If you want China's Belt Road Initiative to just conquer Africa, pull the rug out from the tens of millions of people who are relying on us for this help.

TODD: Hold on, Washington says this stuff all the time, though. They say don't change anything. Don't look into anything. The audit of USAID last year faulted the agency for not having any internal controls on the overhead expenses of its partner organizations, the NGOs is giving money to. It used to, before 2005, you could only you could only get 80 percent of your money from the government.

We took that off. We've taken it off every year --

JONES: Lots of ways -- fix it, this is the wrong way of doing it.

TODD: It's reasonable to look at this.

JONES: I read you on that, there are smart ways to do things, and there are dumb ways to do things. I have no problem with making programs better. I have problems with abandoning sick people.

COOPER: All right, Van Jones, Elizabeth Griffin, Brad Todd, thank you.

Coming up, more breaking news, two key deadlines that potentially could lead to thousands of the FBI being forced out over their role in investigating -- doing their jobs on the January 6th riots.

Plus, plus Trump's attempts to push the limits of presidential power and reward allies that what lessons can history teach us about that? Has that happened before? Pulitzer prize winning presidential historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin joins me for that.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:32:22]

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: More now in a breaking news about the FBI purge we mentioned at the top of the broadcast. Thousands of FBI officials are now facing the prospect of mass firings. As of Monday, deadline set by President Trump's administration has now come and gone for officials to complete a questionnaire about their involvement in the investigation surrounding January 6th rioters.

Tomorrow, leaders of the FBI are expected to hand over the names of all FBI officials who worked on investigations. And this follows, obviously, the firing Friday of more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on the federal investigations into President Trump.

Sources also tell CNN that at least six senior FBI leaders promoted by ousted FBI Director Christopher Wray, who stepped down, have been told to retire, resign, or be fired.

I'm joined now by former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and CNN Chief of Law Enforcement and Intelligence Analyst John Miller. So, John, I mean, is this what the FBI workforce expected to happen given, you know, what Trump campaigned on, or is this exceeding what was feared?

JOHN MILLER, CNN CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST: Far exceeding. And far exceeding anything that has ever happened before. This is completely 100 percent unprecedented. So, what actually is happening? You've got Brian Driscoll as the acting director, in between Director Wray and Kash Patel, if in fact, he's confirmed, who is holding the fort, basically, who is getting from the Deputy Attorney General, Emil Bove, who was Donald Trump's criminal lawyer.

COOPER: Right.

MILLER: You know, we need a list of everybody who worked on the January 6th cases, which I was still in the Joint Terrorism Task Force when those cases were going on. That's like between 5,000 and 6,000 agents. It's basically a third of the FBI agents. That --

COOPER: I mean, and by the way, that's people just doing their jobs. Like --

MILLER: I mean, that could be the case agent who was assigned. They don't get to pick what their cases are. A supervisor says, you, you and you, you're on this case. It could be the case agent, or it could be some agent who served a minor subpoena who is in that file.

COOPER: Right.

MILLER: So, when Driscoll said, you know, I'm not going to create a list like that, the answer was, well, here's a questionnaire. Send it out to everybody to fill out. And the questions are, what's your current title? Who are you? Are you a supervisor? Were you a supervisor at the time?

Where were you assigned at the time? What did you do in the investigation? Was it analytical support? Did you approve electronic communications? Did you lead an operation or make an arrest? Were you assigned as a case agent on one of these trials?

COOPER: All related to Trump.

MILLER: All related to the events at or near the Capitol on January 6th, to quote the questionnaire. And there's drop-down menus where they have to click things. Now, if you're an FBI agent, actually, you don't have to be an FBI agent to figure out, they're not doing this to figure out who to set up for awards or medals. This is a targeting device.

[20:35:09]

And if you ask the, you know, Justice Department people, where's this coming from? They say, well, it's coming from the White House. If you ask the FBI people in the front office where it's coming from, they're saying it's coming from the White House to the Justice Department to the FBI. So they're under tremendous pressure.

And, Anderson, I got to tell you, all weekend long, the FBI was reeling. Agents calling other agents, agents calling former agents, agents talking to colleagues and friends saying, what do I do with this? Do I just quit? Do I wait for this firing squad?

Not much FBI work is getting done because across the United States, there are field offices where people worked on these cases. They're in crisis mode. And these questionnaires are due to be finished today, reviewed at FBI headquarters tomorrow, and then turned over to DOJ, and then presumably to the White House.

And you have people like Stephen Miller, you know, senior adviser to President Trump, who are saying, yes, the FBI was weaponized, you know, against the Republican Party and the President and his family. And, you know, this is the right thing to do.

COOPER: Yes, I mean, this looks like weaponization of, I mean, if you want to make that argument. Andrew, the head of the FBI's New York field office told his team that he's prepared to dig in to defend them, saying, "Today, we find ourselves in the middle of a battle of our own as good people are being walked out of the FBI, and others are being targeted because they did their jobs in accordance with the law and FBI policy". And that's the end of the quote.

Have you ever seen this much uncertainty, apprehension inside the bureau?

ANDREW MCCABE, CNN SENIOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYST: No, no, nothing like this, Anderson. This is totally unprecedented. FBI rank and file agents and analysts who make up the vast majority of the field offices, who do the work in -- of investigating these cases, of executing search warrants, of executing arrest warrants, doing surveillance, electronic surveillance, whatever it might be.

Those people are never touched by the political winds that blow through every four years, nor should they be. As you said, they don't pick their work. They're assigned to the work that they do. The work they do is lawful. It's within FBI policies, and not doing the work is not really an option for them, right?

They come to the FBI, most of them come intending to stay for the entirety of their careers, 20 years or more, 20 years on the agent side, a little bit more for the support side. And so to be targeted in this way for termination potentially or retribution simply for doing their jobs on a major national security case is incomprehensible to them or anybody that knows the organization.

I've talked to more FBI people in the last four days than I did in the prior four years. As John has described it accurately, it is a place in utter disarray right now. People are worried about, how am I going to pay the bills? How am I going to support my family if I lose?

You know, if you're -- anywhere in the middle of that career, not close to retirement, if you get fired, you're done. That's the end of your reputation, your ability to get a new job. You lose your pay. You lose your chance at a pension. You lose your health insurance.

This is a moment of terror for these people. It is absolutely disgraceful that they are being put through this in the middle of some political gamesmanship or active retribution. They don't deserve to be treated this way. It's unlawful, and it's disgusting.

COOPER: And John, just real quickly, I mean, these are people who have years of field knowledge, years of law enforcement backgrounds, who are potentially, you know, not only just facing -- destroying their careers, but also where the new people are going to be coming from, what sort of training can match what they have?

MILLER: Anderson, as you described it, this is a corporate memory of the executives that they walked out last week. It's the experience of the agents and their human sources and what they know. But it's also the threat environment right now, which is it's very unforgiving to a learning curve.

You know, in talking to one agent over the weekend, you know, I said, what's the message? They said, tell them we are pissed. We took an oath to protect the American people, and now we're being targeted for it. But no better group of people to be around when times get hard, because we don't give up.

So some of them are thinking of quitting. Some of them are digging in for the fight and saying, we didn't do anything wrong.

COOPER: John Miller, thank you. Andrew McCabe as well.

Up next, more on our breaking news of the President's actions today. And this weekend, through the eyes of history, Doris Kearns Goodwin joins us next. And the latest on last week's tragic midair collision outside Reagan National Airport between an American Airlines plane and that Army Black Hawk helicopter. I'll talk to the parents of a 28-year-old crew chief, one of 67 who died.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:44:14]

COOPER: Our breaking news tonight about Elon Musk's efforts to seize control of the federal government's checkbook, plus the effort to purge authorities associated with the January 6th investigations, are in one respect both stories about a president rewarding those who supported his election. Both are also history-making attempts at redefining presidential power.

I'm joined now by Pulitzer Prize-winning Presidential Historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin. She's the author of a number of bestsellers, including "Leadership in Turbulent Times". So Doris, has there been another time in American history when the fate of the federal workforce was so up in the air, with people at risk of being fired or just doing their jobs, or for their perceived partisan loyalties?

DORIS KEARNS GOODWIN, PRESIDENTIAL HISTORIAN: Well, what's so interesting is to look back at when this system under President Jackson was formed, which was considered the spoil system, where before that time we'd had people from Washington and all the presidents up to him putting in people who knew what they were doing, presumably.

[20:45:07]

Jackson comes in, he's a populist, he's against the elites. He fears that the bureaucracy that's been forged will be against the rules and the decisions he wants to make. So he fires them and he brings in his own people, his relatives, friends, people who are loyal to the party.

And that was considered the spoil system. To the victor belongs the spoil. So that certainly has an echo today.

COOPER: So people were given jobs in the government who were loyal to Jackson.

GOODWIN: Correct, correct. And then what happened, Anderson, is that after a period of time, so that's in the 1830s, then you get up to the Civil War, and the war and the Industrial Revolution has made government much more complex. And the fact that you have people in power who are not experts, they're not based on what they knew, it was rather who they knew rather than what they knew, and that's when the Civil Service Reform Movement begins.

And Mark Twain had a great statement about it. He said, where in the world would you put a secretary in who doesn't know the alphabet? Where in the world would you put a blacksmith in who doesn't know how to wield a sledgehammer? And that became the Civil Service Reform Movement based on what had just been established in Britain, a civil service reform where you had to take an exam of merit to come into the civil service because they needed people with expertise.

It was a period of time when there was a lot of corruption. It was a period of time when they needed people who knew what they were doing. So finally that system was beginning to get underway, but it took a long, long time because the other system was so entrenched.

It took until President Garfield ran as a reform candidate for civil service, and then he was assassinated six months later by a disappointed job seeker, and that created emotions. The hanging of the assassin was emotions. Finally, the civil service system finally gets established in the Pendleton Act in 1883.

COOPER: And Teddy Roosevelt was the civil service commissioner. He's the one who really got -- I mean, rolled up his sleeves and really kind of brought this into the modern age.

GOODWIN: Absolutely. Because when he got in there -- and he was there for six years. This was a huge commitment of his time. People said, why are you doing this? He said because he thought a tenet of democracy was to have people who could be a mechanic's son, a farmer's son having the same chance at his exam as the son of a politician or the son of a wealthy businessman.

And when he got in, the system was so entrenched, he had to really fight. And he was a fighter. There were cartoons about him being a civil service guy, you know, riding a bucking bronco, and he's saying, stay seated, don't give up, don't let them bounce you out. And he was able to give speeches about the importance of it.

He found the corruption in the system. A lot of people who were already there fighting the civil service reform were taking exams for other people to keep them to get in. They instituted a 3 percent tax on all the salaries of the civil service workers so that they had to pay the party coffers with that.

COOPER: Wow.

GOODWIN: He had investigative reporters come in.

COOPER: So wait a minute, it was so corrupt the Civil --

GOODWIN: And then --

COOPER: -- that it was so like, there was so much political cronyism that political parties would get 3 percent cut of civil servants' salary for giving them a job?

GOODWIN: Exactly.

COOPER: Wow.

GOODWIN: Is that incredible? And what Teddy Roosevelt did and the investigative reporters did, they showed what difference that made. That 3 percent could make the difference of a winter coat or a vacation or putting aside some money for your kids.

And that created a human response to the need for really enforcing the civil rights situation. And by the time Teddy left, that system that we now have was established 130 years ago where your merit was what would get you the job and expertise was required rather than just being the friend of somebody and loyal to somebody.

COOPER: Wow. And now -- I mean, it's so incredible, the cycles of history. You have loyalty. You know, they're asking, you know, future possible civil servants or government employees, you know, who won the 2020 election. And if you don't say Donald Trump, it's unlikely you'll get the job.

GOODWIN: Yes, I know. And even in 1939, the civil service system was advanced by having the Hatch Act where you were not allowed to be in politics. You couldn't do anything while you were a civil servant. So that division was really an important one to contain neutrality.

And that's what you need. You need people who are doing the job of government workers. They're for all of us. They're not for one party or the other. They do our veterans' affairs. They do our Social Security. They do our Medicare. They do all sorts of things that matter in our daily lives, national parks, and you want them able to do their job and have commitment.

I can't even imagine what the morale is in the --

COOPER: Yes.

GOODWIN: -- in the government service right now with all this talk of what's going on. And we need them. They're us.

COOPER: Yes. Doris Kearns Goodwin, it's always good to talk to you. Thank you. A reminder of history and how cycles repeat.

Up next, an update on the salvage work at the site of last week's deadly plane and Army helicopter collision. And we remember Staff Sergeant Ryan O'Hara, the crew chief aboard the Black Hawk chopper, and his parents share memories of their son.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[20:54:36]

COOPER: Officials say 55 of 67 people aboard last night's, excuse me, last week's plane and helicopter which collided have been identified. Today, salvage crews started to remove the wreckage of American Airlines Flight 5342 from the Potomac.

Over the weekend, the Army released the name of the third soldier killed aboard the chopper, 28-year-old Captain Rebecca Lobach, who was co-piloting the aircraft. In a statement, her family said she had more than 450 hours of flight time and called her a bright star and a warrior. [20:55:04]

Also killed, 39-year-old Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Lloyd Eaves, the instructor pilot. He had about 1,000 flight hours. And 28-year-old Staff Sergeant Ryan O'Hara, who served as crew chief. He was trained to maintain that specific type of helicopter. I spoke with his parents, Gary and Mary O'Hara, on Friday.

(BEGIN VIDEOCLIP)

COOPER: Gary and Mary, thank you so much for joining us. I'm so sorry that we're talking under these circumstances. Gary, can you just talk a little bit about Ryan? Because my understanding is he was such a good crew chief, that he was the guy called upon to train other crew chiefs in everything about the Black Hawk.

GARY O'HARA, FATHER OF BLACK HAWK VICTIM STAFF SGT. RYAN O'HARA: Yes, that's correct. He had been doing this for 10 years. He was a natural- born teacher. Loved working with people, loved working in the Black Hawk. So part of his mission is to, you know, not only train other crew chiefs, but to work with pilots when they go on different missions.

And when they go on an actual assignment in the field, the crew chief doubles as the door gunner. So that was his responsibility as well when he was in Afghanistan.

COOPER: Mary, you must have been so concerned about him when he was in Afghanistan, as the crew chief, as Gary was saying, he was the door gunner on those missions.

MARY O'HARA, MOTHER OF BLACK HAWK VICTIM STAFF SGT. RYAN O'HARA: Yes, absolutely. I was worried the entire time he was over there, but in the event that something did happen, I was kind of prepared, given where he was. That's something that I would expect to happen over there, but not here in the United States. I never would have thought that this is how it would happen.

COOPER: You were watching live on CNN this. Did you know that he had been flying that night?

G. O'HARA: Yes. No, well, we didn't know.

M. O'HARA: Not initially.

G. O'HARA: And he -- there were periods where he might not fly for two weeks, and, you know, we didn't know what his schedule was. But when I saw the accident, they said it was a Black Hawk, and, you know, they're replaying the incident, I knew.

I was on the phone with Mary immediately, and, you know, there's multiple aircraft there. It could have been any, you know, crew chief could have been on that, but I just knew. And then, you know, by 12:30, they confirmed that it was his Black Hawk. But, you know, now --

COOPER: You felt it.

G. O'HARA: Yes. And Mary's telling me, no, no, no, it's not the case, no.

M. O'HARA: Well, yes, he hadn't been flying recently, so I told him, there's no way it could be him. But then his -- Ryan's wife called me and said that, yes, he started flying two or three weeks ago.

COOPER: Is there anything else you want people to know about Ryan, Gary, or Mary?

M. O'HARA: He was just a great guy all the way around. He was a good son. A very loving father to his little boy.

G. O'HARA: Out of all the things we've done, we're most proud of our -- what we've -- what our children have become. They've become really wonderful human beings, and we're very proud of him. Would have been proud of him in any vocation.

But, you know, knowing Ryan, if he had known that this would be the outcome, Anderson, he wouldn't have changed anything. He loved working with the -- this crew. You know, told us that these guys were state- of-the-art pilots. He loved flying with them. You know, he was trusting them with his life, and he would have done it again.

COOPER: Well, I have little kids of my own, a two-year-old and a four- year-old, and I've been reading a lot about child development, and they say that everything is determined in the first three to five years of a child's life. And you talked about what a great adult he was. That's because you guys did such a good job raising him and providing a safe, loving home for him.

And I'm so sorry for your loss and the country's loss --

G. O'HARA: That might explain why he was a mechanic, because during those first formative years, he took apart everything in the house. Light switches, toasters.

COOPER: He's all right.

G. O'HARA: Yes.

COOPER: Did you encourage that, or was that --

G. O'HARA: As a parent --

M. O'HARA: We didn't discourage him. Yes, he -- anything --

COOPER: I guess there's not much you could do about it, because you needed him to put them back together.

M. O'HARA: Right.

G. O'HARA: Yes. Like, he was in school. One of the teachers -- elementary school, one of the teachers was throwing out an electric pencil sharpener, and he took it out of the trash, and he brought it home and repaired it and brought it to her the next day.

COOPER: It's like he was born to do this. I mean, this is something -- that's just incredible to me. You know, so many people do stuff that they don't really love, they don't really like. They're doing it because they need -- you know, everybody needs to make a living. But this was a passion, and he was serving his country, and there's just -- it's just -- what an extraordinary life and contribution he made.

So thank you for talking to us, Gary and Mary. I really appreciate it.

M. O'HARA: Thank you.

(END VIDEOCLIP)

COOPER: Ryan O'Hara was 28 years old.

That's it for us. The news continues. The Source with Kaitlan Collins starts now.