Return to Transcripts main page
Amanpour
Interview with Philippine Foreign Minister Maria Theresa Lazaro; Interview with U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Tom Fletcher; Interview with Representative Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ); Interview with "Black Wave" Author and Dartmouth College Visiting Professor Kim Ghattas. Aired 1-2p ET
Aired March 26, 2026 - 13:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
[13:00:00]
CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, CNN CHIEF INTERNATIONAL ANCHOR: Hello, everyone, and welcome to Amanpour. Here's what's coming up.
With Asia's economy choked off by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the Philippines declares a national energy emergency. We hear from their
foreign secretary.
Then, in Iran, outside observers report more than 1,400 civilians have been killed. In Lebanon, more than a million are displaced amidst ongoing
Israeli attacks. U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher joins me to discuss the civilian toll of this war.
And a child of Iranian refugees and a member of Congress, Democratic Representative Yassamin Ansari, on the complicated feelings for Iranians
outside and those caught under the bombs.
Plus, Hari Sreenivasan speaks with veteran Middle East correspondent Kim Ghattas about Israel's war in Lebanon.
Welcome to the program, everyone. I'm Christiane Amanpour in London.
Four weeks ago, the United States and Israel began the Iran war. Now, the economic fallout is hitting countries all over the world. With the Strait
of Hormuz blocked, energy-starved nations are taking extreme measures to keep their economies afloat.
Asia is particularly hard hit. Japan taps into national oil reserves. South Korea asks folks to take shorter showers to conserve electricity. And in
India, no gas cremations, as supplies are being rationed for the living.
This week, the Philippines became the first country to declare a state of national energy emergency. President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. appointed a
committee to ensure the availability of fuel, food, medicines, and agricultural products. And a Filipino refinery received a shipment of
Russian oil today after the U.S. waived sanctions, allowing the purchase of that crude.
Maria Theresa Lazaro is the Philippine secretary of foreign affairs, and she joined me from Manila. Foreign Secretary, welcome to our program.
MARIA THERESA LAZARO, PHILIPPINE FOREIGN MINISTER: Thank you very much.
AMANPOUR: You, the Philippines, have become the first country to declare a national emergency because of all of this. How bad is it right now?
LAZARO: Yes, indeed. I think for ASEAN, for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, we are the first to declare an energy emergency. Now, how
bad is it? Well, we are looking from the aspect of supply and the prices. It seems that our supply for our petroleum needs is about 40 to 45 days.
And this has really had an impact. Particularly, we may have the supply, but the prices really have gone high. And we are of the view, particularly
President Marcos, is looking into the impact to the economy.
AMANPOUR: What do you think is the worst outcome of all of this? Obviously, on the grand scale of the economy, but in individual sectors,
what is the impact already? And what happens if you actually run out of oil and fuel?
LAZARO: Well, first of all, it's already taking a toll on the ordinary Filipino. The transportation cost, the price of food, because it also
affects the fertilizers that are being used for our food security. So, these are all now -- it has its cascading effect from energy issues. It
goes down now to our food, agriculture, particularly.
AMANPOUR: And, Madam Secretary, you know, it's already beginning to cause some distress and some protests, as we know that there have been taxi
drivers and transport workers blocking roads today as we speak in the capital, Manila, and striking over what you're talking about, the cost of
fuel, the lack of payments. These diesel and petrol prices have more than doubled, as you say, in the last month.
You've offered some mitigation, about 5,000 pesos for some transport workers, but many say they aren't getting them. Let me play just a short
clip of one of these workers.
[13:05:00]
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JOSEPH ORINION, JEEPNEY DRIVER (through translator): It's overwhelming. It's a lot to deal with because tomorrow you'll never know how to adjust
the money that you earn. Our earnings keep shrinking. That is the most painful thing happening to us because of the rise in cost of diesel.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: So, you hear from one of your own country people, what is the best you can do for them right now? And what is the worst that might happen
if you can't?
LAZARO: I think that the biggest issue is not the cost of fuel. And I think that the biggest issue is the cost of transportation. Well, right
now, the president has come up with this national energy emergency. Now, what does this mean? With these emergency powers, it will now give the
legal authority for the president and certain members of the bureaucracy, the agencies concerned, to really ensure energy supply that will mitigate
the increase of prices and energy needs, again, with a view of helping the economy.
Now, I think this is actually a whole-of-government effort. And, well, this was just announced by the president only about, I think, yesterday. It can
start with decreasing certain taxes, particularly excise taxes. We are also looking into the VAT possibility in the future. Now, these are very
important emergency powers given to the president to mitigate the situation because this will help lower down the prices.
AMANPOUR: Now, you've got about 2.5 million Filipinos living in the Middle East and working there. Are you trying to get them out? Is the fact that
some of them are losing their jobs, you know, sort of diminishing the remittances that they send home? What is the crisis for in that regard?
LAZARO: Well, again, this is an issue. Now, let me just get back to the point that one of the pillars of our foreign policy is assistance to
nationals. And therefore, since the situation started in late February, there has been a number of repatriation efforts by both the Department of
Foreign Affairs and another agency which is in charge of overseas workers, the Department of Migrant Workers.
So, far, there has been almost 2,000 of our contract workers that have been repatriated. And, of course, that goes without saying that they are being
taken care of while here in the Philippines. However, there are still a number of people who are requesting to be repatriated, and all efforts are
there. And it's continuing, and we have been looking at situations.
If the airspace is closed in certain places in the Middle East, certain airports, then our embassies as well as consulates try to find some land
routes. And therefore, we have still Filipinos, let's say, in Iran, and we're trying to get them out through Turkey. And the same thing with the
other countries in the GCC.
AMANPOUR: So, I want to ask you, Foreign Secretary, you are a very close ally of the United States. As I said, Asia appears to be impacted the worst
by the energy crisis right now. Did you get any heads up? Could you have made any contingency plans? And will this sort of maybe push you into an
alliance of necessity, perhaps, with China? Because your own president has said the Philippines might embrace joint energy exploration with China in
the South China Sea.
LAZARO: Well, first of all, the United States has been very helpful in providing us also some energy sources. I mean, all these details are
actually with the Department of Energy. But yes, to your question, the United States has even reached out.
Now, to your other query, there is such a possibility because of also the need for our energy sources. And I mentioned also the statement made by the
president because there might just be some discussions on a certain disputed territory whereby there can be some kind of discussions and
negotiations.
AMANPOUR: I understand. Regional security, of course, is an issue. As you know, a lot of this about Iran in the U.S. and Israel's, you know, reason
for war is to make sure that Iran never gets a nuclear bomb. But just in your hemisphere, in Asia, North Korean dictator Kim Jong U.N. told his
lawmakers this week that the Iran war justifies his decision to double down on nuclear weapons. What's your reaction to that?
[13:10:00]
LAZARO: Well, we have been very consistent in our position against North Korea and its ambition towards a missile -- I mean, having this missile
capability. And we have been one, particularly when we have our statements made together with the Republic of Korea and Japan, that we have been
telling them that we are against this situation. And there has been some continuous discussions, particularly this is being discussed in the ASEAN
setting now that we're the chair of ASEAN.
AMANPOUR: What is your biggest concern now about the war on Iran and all the consequences that may or may not have been predicted?
LAZARO: Well, the biggest concern is actually when, until when will the situation last? Because, again, as we said, we go back to the very basic
issues that we have, our energy security as well as food security. And it's this unpredictability that we are facing.
But, of course, we are not sitting down. The Philippines, together with our other ASEAN countries, are trying to look into a number of possibilities.
In fact, there have been meetings of our ASEAN energy ministers.
And again, the possibility of helping each other, because some of our ASEAN members are also oil producing countries. But we still need a good number
of sources.
AMANPOUR: Maria Theresa Lazaro, foreign secretary of the Philippines, thank you very much for being with us.
LAZARO: Thank you.
AMANPOUR: And stay with us. We'll be back right after the break.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
AMANPOUR: Now, the immediate toll of this war is not just economic, of course. Dozens of people have been killed in the Gulf countries, in Israel
and the occupied West Bank. In Iran, more than 1,400 civilians are dead, including over 200 children, according to the U.S.-based human rights
activist news agency. And in Lebanon, targeting of intense Israeli bombardments and a ground invasion against Hezbollah have caused over a
million people to be displaced. And the Ministry of Public Health says more than 1,000 are dead there.
Tom Fletcher is undersecretary-general for Humanitarian Affairs at the United Nations, and he's joining me here in the studio. Welcome back to our
program.
We don't talk very much about the humanitarian catastrophe that's unfolding. Obviously, everything is being viewed in terms of the bombs
falling, the assassinations and the economic crisis after the chokehold. What is, in your view, the humanitarian fallout?
TOM FLETCHER, U.N. UNDERSECRETARY-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS: Well, it's massive, Christiane. I mean, so we've got thousands dead, as you
described. We've got millions displaced across the region. And we'll be paying for this war for years to come.
And people are already -- the world is making choices to spend tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars on this conflict rather than on
dealing with the survivors, supporting the survivors and supporting the 300 million people who already needed humanitarian support. So, I mean, we're
deeply frustrated with that. I mean, that's diplomatic speak for saying we're furious, because supporting the 300 million people who already needed
humanitarian support.
[13:15:00]
So, I mean, we're deeply frustrated with that. I mean, that's diplomatic speak for saying we're furious, because rich people are winning out of
this. The arms dealers are winning. Those speculating on the stock market are winning. And the people I serve are losing.
AMANPOUR: People making bets on this.
FLETCHER: Absolutely. Well, the victims of this conflict are the civilians.
AMANPOUR: Can I ask you, this is kind of the first time that I've sort of been aware of something of such magnitude and massive importance almost
being treated in an unserious way? You've just talked about the speculation and I've just talked about the betting, you know, on oil prices and things
and stock prices. Can you remember a time when we didn't hear from the major leaders, when we don't hear the big diplomacy and the set pieces? And
it's just hard.
FLETCHER: It is hard. And, you know, diplomacy is not reality TV. The world's not a casino. Statecraft is not a real estate deal. We've got to
get serious again. International law is not sexy, it's not exciting, but it's what we built to restrain ourselves from our worst instincts. And
we've got to get back to the table. We need rational, serious, strategic conversation again, rather than this day-to-day game show approach to the
world.
AMANPOUR: And not just that. It's almost, oh, well, if they don't come to the peace table, we'll just keep bombing. Oh, well. Oh, well. Talking about
dropping bombs is fun. You know, letting -- it's very weird. I've never heard this kind of cynicism being expressed from the highest podiums in the
world.
And in the meantime, so tell me, what is the humanitarian crisis? Let's take Iran first, and then we'll go to Lebanon.
FLETCHER: Well, just to finish your point there, I mean, what we're not hearing is anything about protecting civilians. And, you know, a year ago,
I wouldn't have thought I'd need to come on and use the talking point about protecting civilian infrastructure. And yet, now it seems to be open season
that people are talking about bombing schools, bombing hospitals, bombing bridges. All of those things are war crimes. They're completely
unacceptable. But somehow that's become part of the day-to-day rhetoric here from all sides.
But the -- so, the humanitarian impact is massive in Iran. We're scaling up what we're doing there in response, particularly looking at the refugee
crisis, where my colleagues at UNHCR are leading an effort to ensure that people already displaced are getting the help they need.
I'll be going to Lebanon in the next few days. It's a real epicenter, I think, of the crisis now, but I fear of the crisis in the weeks and months
to come. We can't get our convoys to the south of Lebanon right now because the bridges have been destroyed.
AMANPOUR: I've heard from the former Israeli prime minister, who I had on the program, I think it was last week, who said that even if the Iran war
does, you know, de-escalate and they find some kind of negotiated end to this or whatever, that the Israeli prime minister, Netanyahu, will increase
and up the tempo of the attacks in Lebanon.
So, how many dead, how many displaced, and where do you see that ending, and are there the resources?
FLETCHER: We've got over a million displaced. That's one in five people. It's staggering. And remember, many of those people were already displaced,
and they're often being displaced from one ethnic area into another, which creates all sorts of tensions and further dangers. You've also got hundreds
of thousands moving back and forth across the Lebanon-Syria border. I'll be in Damascus later this week as well.
So, I do fear that we might get to a point in Iran where both sides claim some sort of Pyrrhic victory, but that conflict in Lebanon will continue.
And you're hearing some pretty chilling things from Israeli ministers about turning the south of Lebanon into Gaza. I've been to Gaza twice in the last
year, as you know. That is a terrifying thing to be talking about.
AMANPOUR: I mean, there's another thing. It's like, oh, they say that and nobody really pays attention or reacts. It's very weird, and you talked
about potential war crimes. You know, the Democratic senator, Chris Murphy, last week or earlier this week, tweeted after Trump said, you'd better open
the -- to the Iranians, you better open the Straits of Hormuz within, you know, 48 hours or we will destroy and target all your power plants. And
Murphy says that's, in fact, a war crime.
FLETCHER: Well, some of us do try and speak out, and the United Nations secretary-general has been very, very firm in calling this kind of
language, this kind of behavior out, you know, it's our job, isn't it, your job in the media, my job in the U.N., to keep focusing attention on
international law. But just talking in those terms will get us a load of blowback from those who disagree, who think that we should just be ignoring
this and moving on to the next episode of the game show.
AMANPOUR: Can I play -- you just mentioned the secretary-general, let me just play what he said yesterday about the chaos of a widening war.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ANTONIO GUTERRES, UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-GENERAL: Just hours into the outbreak of the war in the Middle East, I warned that the fighting risks
triggering a chain reaction that no one could control. More than three weeks on, the war is out of control. The conflict has broken past the
limits even leaders thought unimaginable.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: You know, that's serious stuff, and you've warned we're seeing consequences spread faster than we can respond.
[13:20:00]
So, the World Food Programme, roughly 45 million more people could be pushed into acute hunger if the conflict continues, on top of the 318
million people who already are, as you said, you know, very vulnerable and suffering, you know, food insecurity around the world.
So, as you picture this, because we just reported before you came on, it's even going towards -- well, very much hitting Asia right now. And it's not
just they can't fill up their cars, they can't buy food, they can't afford to feed their children, many of these workers.
FLETCHER: Well, the secretary-general's been absolutely clear on this and he's really meeting the moment. We are really concerned about those
secondary and tertiary impacts. So, you look at what's happening in Afghanistan, Pakistan, look at what's happening in Iraq right now. Again,
big populations already displaced, fragile economies.
I'm particularly worried about East Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. If we can't get our maritime convoys moving through the Straits of Hormuz, then
actually more people will be tipped into famine conditions. That World Food Programme stat is really, really worrying. 45 million more people could be
pushed into hunger.
So, we're now having to adapt our routes. We're actually taking much of the supplies from Dubai now to Jeddah and across.
AMANPOUR: So, all the way across Saudi Arabia?
FLETCHER: Absolutely.
AMANPOUR: And can you use the Red Sea because there was the threats that maybe the Houthis in sympathy or whatever with Iran would try to close that
and not let it come up the Suez Canal?
FLETCHER: So, at the moment we can, but that's a real fragility really in the supply chain. Our air convoys, of course, are very disrupted. So, we
keep having to adjust. But you know, these changes alone cost us four or five weeks. And if you're already starving, those four or five weeks are
terrible.
AMANPOUR: Can I -- there are other things as well that are happening under cover of this war. Let's say in the West Bank, the occupied West Bank,
Haaretz has now reported that a 17-year-old, Walid Ahmad, who was arrested from the West Bank in 2024, starved to death inside Israel's Megiddo
Prison. He's the first Palestinian under 18 to die.
Apparently autopsy found no singular definitive cause, but saw the teen suffered from extreme malnutrition and a judge ruled that starvation didn't
prove the cause of death. I don't quite understand this, but what do you make of it? And there have been others, maybe just not as young.
FLETCHER: So, one real worry about this crisis, we only have bandwidth really for two or three stories at a time. And so, as a result, a lot of
other issues get completely neglected. I mean, Ukraine at the moment, DRC, South Sudan where I've just been, and this rising settler violence in the
West Bank, which looks to me to be very organized, very targeted, and which is driving huge numbers of people from their homes.
And that again is storing up problems for the future because it undermines, of course, any prospect of the two-state solution on which actually the
future piece of the region depends.
AMANPOUR: It really doesn't seem like any leader anyway there has any intention of pursuing that at the moment or ever. What about USAID cuts?
Because that helps the International Community, right? All the money that they gave, you know, it makes up less than 1 percent of the federal U.S.
budget, but they were life-saving programs for the rest of the world. And now, groups such as the UNHCR and others are appealing for donations. What
actual impact is that having right now?
FLETCHER: It has a huge impact. I mean, over the years USAID money saved hundreds of millions of lives and so of course the cuts have a big impact.
I'm appealing this year for $23 billion globally with which we can save 87 million lives. It's a staggering number. We saved, listen, 7 million lives
in January alone. And I'll bring you back the stat for February. This is extraordinary when our people are out there literally under attack every
day delivering that support.
AMANPOUR: And they are now, right? I mean, U.N. workers have been killed even in this war.
FLETCHER: Absolutely. I mean, every week I'm calling the relatives of U.N. colleagues and NGO colleagues who are being killed out there on the front
lines.
Now, some U.S. money is coming back in. We announced at the end of December $2 billion coming back into the humanitarian system. And currently we're
allocating that across 18 different country crises. That makes the U.S. the biggest individual national donor. So, we're grateful for that, but it's
not what it was of course. But it's not just the U.S., Christine. I mean, everyone is cutting their budgets at the moment.
AMANPOUR: I was going to say your own country, you know, the E.U. and the U.K. as well, right?
FLETCHER: So, the U.K. has just cut to 0.3 percent of GDP. So, the --
AMANPOUR: Well, it should be 7 percent.
FLETCHER: It was not 0.7 percent before.
AMANPOUR: 0.7, I'm sorry.
FLETCHER: So, a lot of these countries really scaling back. Now, we've got some great loyal donors and I could give you the listing, starting from the
Netherlands and Switzerland and others who are staying the course. Norway, who are -- you know, all the ones I've forgotten now, I'll get into trouble
with. Please forgive me, those other countries. So, some countries are staying the course.
But overall, this has gone from a sector that was probably spending about $50 billion a year on aid, to probably about $20 billion.
[13:25:00]
AMANPOUR: And when the U.K. announced it's cutting back and then said it would only, you know, give to -- there was several like Gaza and other
commitments they would keep. But it's actually, they said, because of now the pressure to spend more on military. So, it's literally guns and butter
right now.
FLETCHER: All I'm asking for, $23 billion, it's less than 1 percent of what the world is spending on on guns right now. And that's before this
latest escalation where I understand that, you know, they spent that in the first two weeks. The U.S. alone spent that in the first two weeks of the
conflict. So, you've got some people who are cutting for ideological reasons and you've got others who are cutting because they say they feel
less secure. Particularly the Europeans, they feel less secure on their own continent and they're saying we have to invest more in guns and weapons.
But also, you're seeing the brainpower of the world spending more time inventing more and more deadly drones. 90 percent of all drone attacks are
against civilians, by the way, including many of our humanitarians. More energy on that --
AMANPOUR: 90 percent?
FLETCHER: Nine out of every 10 attacks from drones are hitting civilians. You've got all that ingenuity and creativity and technological know-how
going into working out more and more deadly ways of killing each other, rather than backing up these laws and systems that are meant to protect
ourselves from our worst instincts.
AMANPOUR: Well, we are very happy that you were able to come in and explain the current state of affairs and we'll wait for your next report.
Tom Fletcher, thank you very much.
FLETCHER: Thank you.
AMANPOUR: And we'll be back after this short break.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
AMANPOUR: On February 28th, President Donald Trump announced major combat operations began in Iran, and he added this message to the people there.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, U.S. PRESIDENT: To the great proud people of Iran, I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don't
leave your home. It's very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be
yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: Now, that call has since not been raised so much. And since that call, American and Israeli bombs have killed over 1,000 Iranians, and IRGC
enforcers continue to crack down on any domestic protest.
U.S. Representative Yassamin Ansari is the child of Iranian refugees and is the only Democratic Iranian American in Congress. She says that she feels a
wide mix of emotions over what she argues is an illegal war. Representative Ansari, welcome to our program.
Can I start by asking you about your family? Where are your parents? Where are your, you know, extended family who might still be in Iran? What would
you know about how they are?
REP. YASSAMIN ANSARI (D-AZ): Thank you so much for having me. My parents have a pretty classic story, as many do here in the United States, who are
part of the diaspora. They fled Iran. My dad came to the United States before the revolution and then stayed here in the U.S. And my mom fled in
the midst, in the aftermath, in the early 1980s after my grandfather was imprisoned in Iran.
So, I have spent my entire life hearing about the atrocities of this regime, have had family members impacted and murdered by the regime as
well. We have extended family, friends in Iran. My mom's 90-year-old great- aunt lives in Tehran.
[13:30:00]
And it's been, you know, as you know, largely difficult to get in touch with friends and family given the internet blackouts in the country.
AMANPOUR: Exactly, I really do know that. And it's obviously a source of great anxiety for many people, not only there but outside.
So, tell me then, given your history and given what President Trump said and even what the prime minister of Israel said, we are preparing
essentially the groundwork for you to take control of your destiny. You must have supported that.
ANSARI: Here's the issue. Donald Trump is a wannabe dictator and authoritarian here in the United States. He doesn't want democracy for the
American people. And I have seen over the last 15 months as a U.S. congresswoman him using ICE and turning ICE into his own personal
paramilitary force. He has gone after the press. He has tried to go after his own political opponents. We have seen an erosion of rights all over the
map here in the United States.
So, it's very painful to see the way that himself and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are outright lying and selling a fantasy to Iranian
people who are rightfully and understandably desperate for regime change, especially in light of the massacres that took place in January.
But if you look at everything Donald Trump has said, he's not interested in actual freedom or democracy for the Iranian people. We don't even know what
the exact objective of this war is. But I can tell you in briefings that I have been a part of, I've directly asked this question, is there a plan for
a democratic transition in Iran? And it's been made very clear to me that that is not a part of the mission.
Meanwhile, Americans are seeing gas prices go through the roof. There are American troops on their way to the Middle East. It's largely unpopular
among the American population and we're seeing devastating consequences across the region. So, it is terrifying that we have really a mentally
deranged leader here in the United States putting the rest of the world in such danger.
AMANPOUR: Can I ask you then, given what you said about no transition plan for democracy or for people's rights in Iran under this, do you think
they've also walked back their stated goal of creating the conditions, even if you said it's up to you Iranians, even if we don't help you, it's up to
you once we finish the bombing. Do you think that's been walked back?
ANSARI: It absolutely has been. Just in the last 48 hours you've seen the President and his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, say there's been
regime change in Iran. If this is their definition of regime change then, you know, we know, you know, absolutely that maybe they don't understand
Iran, which I think could be very plausible that they don't understand the history or the country that they're dealing with, the way the regime
operates, the way the IRGC operates.
But yes, I think that they thought this would be easy. I thought they think, I think they thought this would be a Venezuela style operation. You
know, they would kill the ayatollah and the next day, you know, there would be a big uprising in the country. But that is not reality. This is a
country of 90 million people who have gone through horrendous massacres. They're terrified of both the regime as well as bombs, you know, falling
from the sky.
And I think that, you know, again, we are now in this horrific situation, this costly illegal war, and I worry that this is going to leave the
Iranian people in an even worse position after, whenever it becomes that Donald Trump decides he's tired of this or it's too politically unpopular
for him, and he declares some sort of fake victory, and then this, the Iranian people are left with a regime that will crack down even further,
and there will be no support later on.
AMANPOUR: CNN has been gathering voices from inside Iran and been doing it since the beginning. And many people were, as you know, very happy to see
this bombing, going to the roofs, shouting, you know, that they were happy that Khamenei and the others were killed. Now, it appears to be somewhat
shifting the sentiment. So, we're going to play you a selection of the latest voices that we've collected out of Tehran.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE (through translator): I am angry. I am so angry that nothing has changed, and that more likely nothing will happen or change
that will benefit the Iranian people. I had the same feeling last time in the 12-day war. Why did this happen? For what? Why did they, for 12 days,
bomb U.S., force us out of our homes, force us to flee? It created terror and horror for ourselves, our children, our animals. These things are
serious. Our lives are at risk. Maybe if they do talk, at the very least, it can improve the economic situation.
[13:35:00]
If this war continues, our lives will be halted and stopped, meaning we cannot move forward. While the situation in Iran remains unclear, we are
all up in the air. We've been in this limbo for months, nearly a year. And in the past few years, it's just gotten worse and worse. I'm pissed off. I
am hopeful. I'm scared. I'm all of these things all at once, and it's suffocating, quite frankly.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: So, that is a selection. It's about three people, but we jammed them all together. But they're very, very concerned about where this leaves
them. What do you say to, in your closed-door briefings that you've apparently had several since this war began, what do you say to the
administration, and what are they telling you about their final aims?
ANSARI: First of all, it's very heartbreaking and difficult to listen to those voices. I think the ultimate tragedy in all of this is the Iranian
people who will have, you know, continue to see tragedy after tragedy in their country, and I only wish the best for them.
I -- you know, the administration has never made any sort of clear case or justification about what this war is about. One day, they will say it's
about the nuclear program. The next, they'll say it's about the Navy or the missile programs. The next day, you'll see Trump say something about
Iranian people. It's not clear at all.
My hope and my urge to this administration is to not abandon the Iranian people in the sense that if diplomacy is happening or any sort of talks are
to happen, it is vital that human rights are part of the conversation, that any, you know, future government in Iran does not -- you know, makes
commitments around not massacring their own people, about releasing political prisoners. There's thousands of people right now trapped inside
places like Evin Prison, the notorious prison in Iran, some of the best and brightest in the country. Those people need to be released immediately, and
this war needs to end. We need an off-ramp that reduces as much harm as possible.
This is a devastating situation, and I echo the voice about the economic situation. Anything we can do to support the economic circumstances of
Iranians would be great.
AMANPOUR: Can I just ask you very quickly, I don't know whether you've seen this, but the Washington Post is reporting that the administration is
considering -- well, it's notified Congress that it intends to divert hundreds of millions of dollars in funding by NATO countries through a
special program. They've already bought from the United States weapons to give Ukraine, right, under orders from the administration, and they plan to
take this and use it to restock their own Pentagon military supplies. What do you say to that?
ANSARI: It's outrageous. Donald Trump has continued to abandon Ukraine and NATO. The fact that he made a statement saying that, you know, NATO should
be coming to our defense right now, he creates crises that didn't exist and then tries to force other people to get us out of it. This has been -- you
know, we've lifted sanctions on Russian oil throughout this time because we're seeing gas prices spike here and Americans are furious, can't pay for
gas or their rent or anything.
And I just -- you know, again, I've heard from Ukrainians in my community and from, you know, partners in Europe that this is -- you know, this has
worldwide consequences and we're seeing them.
AMANPOUR: Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari, thank you for joining us from Washington. And as we said earlier, the Israel-Lebanon front is
intensifying. The IDF says a third soldier was killed in combat against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. This as Israel targets bridges
over the Litani River and occupies the area in order to try to cut off Hezbollah and isolate its strongholds.
Kim Ghattas is a Lebanese journalist and author, and as she explains to Hari Sreenivasan, the escalation could reshape the Middle East for years to
come.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
HARI SREENIVASAN, CNN INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Christiane, thanks. Kim Ghattas, thanks so much for joining us. For most of our audience, as the
conversation has been about the war, it's been about Israel, it's been about the United States, it's been about Iran, but Lebanon is facing a
significant crisis right now, and I think most people are not hearing about it in the news. I'm hearing that almost a quarter of the population is
displaced, we've got more than a thousand people killed, 2,500 injured. What's the situation like in Lebanon?
KIM GHATTAS, AUTHOR, "BLACK WAVE" AND VISITING PROFESSOR, DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: Hari, great to be with you and thanks for focusing on Lebanon,
which is indeed the second big war front in this regional conflict. I would like to point out that since the ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, or
more specifically Hezbollah and Israel, in November of 2024, Israeli strikes against Lebanon have continued on a very regular basis, almost
2,000 strikes in just over a year.
[13:40:00]
So, those strikes don't make headlines either, because they're sort of baked into the normality of things, but they have been very difficult and
painful for Lebanon. And now, the country finds itself engulfed in this new regional war, where Israel has different objectives on the regional front
and in Lebanon.
For Lebanon, as you mentioned, this is the second war in just a year and a half. A quarter of the population is on the move. It is a huge stress on
the Lebanese authorities, on the state coffers for a country that is already in dire economic straits, and of course also very difficult for
Lebanese society to be able to absorb so many people on the move. It's causing some tensions between communities, and of course there is tension
at a national level about what is Lebanon's role in all of this.
SREENIVASAN: So, what do the people feel most frustrated at, I guess? Is it their own government? Is it Israel? Is it the United States? Is it Iran?
GHATTAS: All of the above. The Lebanese are really fed up with being a battleground for regional proxy wars or regional confrontations. There are
many people in Lebanon, I would say a majority, who are angry at Hezbollah for having launched those first rockets at Israel to avenge the deaths of a
foreign leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran. There are even those in Hezbollah's own community who say, you did not avenge any
of the people who were killed over the last year in these Israeli strikes, but you -- Lebanese people, including Hezbollah combatants, and you chose
to avenge the death of a foreign leader.
So, there's a lot of anger and tension there, including in the Shia community, where Hezbollah draws most of its support. There is frustration
at the United States for not understanding the details and the nuances of Lebanon's position and the difficulties that it is facing in living up to
expectations by the International Community.
But I guess there is frustration around the world when it comes to President Trump's approach to this war. Then, finally, there is, of course,
anger at Israel for continuing to bomb Lebanon, including infrastructure, and talking now about taking over southern Lebanon and creating a buffer
zone there, uninhabitable for anyone, that they could occupy and control in the long-term.
And, you know, what is absolutely astounding is that Israel has tried this before, and it did not work. It had an 18-year-long occupation of southern
Lebanon until it withdrew in 2,000.
SREENIVASAN: You wrote recently in the Financial Times, you say this kind of goes back, this interrelationship and this entanglement back in the '70s
and '80s. You had the Iranian revolution in '79, Israel, you know, invasion of Lebanon in '82. How did Hezbollah that we know today form from those
tensions?
GHATTAS: So, if I may just actually add a point, there is also frustration with the Lebanese government, internally and externally, for having not
done enough, and that everything that it is doing now is too little too late, including trying to stand up for Lebanese sovereignty, calling on
Iranian Revolutionary Guards to leave the country, and now calling on the Iranian ambassador to leave as well.
And the reason why it's important to mention this is because it ties into this question now, Hari, which is about the history of this, which is that
in the 1970s and early '80s, Lebanon was a staging ground for attacks against Israel by Palestinian guerrillas, from the Palestinian Liberation
Organization, led at the time by Yasser Arafat.
And there was a certain level of impotence by the Lebanese state, because it's a small country, and there are always outside powers who are, you
know, yes, fighting their wars via Lebanon. At the time, it was Syria and President Hafez al-Assad, and generally Arab countries who did not want
Palestinian guerrillas' fighters on their territory attacking Israel. So, they kind of press-ganged Lebanon into becoming the battleground and the
staging ground for these attacks.
Israel decided to invade Lebanon in 1982 and to, in their words, get rid of that Palestinian threat on its border. And to some extent, that was a
successful military operation, although it cost thousands of lives in Lebanon, because the Palestinian leadership did go into exile.
[13:45:00]
But two days after the Israeli military operation in Lebanon started, Iran sent revolutionary guards, hundreds of them, to Syria and then on to
Lebanon to export their revolution and fight what they describe as the Zionist enemy, push America outside of the Middle East. And that is the
birth of Hezbollah.
So, you may have tactical victory, but you may not have as we're seeing today in this regional confrontation, but you need to be able to think
strategically long-term at what other problems you may be creating.
SREENIVASAN: You know, so how has Hezbollah kind of evolved over time, if that was their origin story?
GHATTAS: So, their origin story is very much a creation of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Lebanon, a tool of both the Islamic Republic and
also at the time of Syria's President Hafez al-Assad to fight against America and Israel. And there's a whole decade of attacks, including the
bombings of the Marines in Beirut in 1983, the French paratroopers, as well, and also, of course, a decade of hostage-taking.
And I want to make a very quick mention here of a scandal known as the Iran-Contra scandal, in which at the time, the U.S. and Israel actually
gave weapons to Iran in the 1980s to try to gain the release of hostages in Lebanon. So, there's also, you know, the law of unintended consequences
there, where Israel and the U.S. actually, in some ways, it's too long for our show now, enable the survival of the Islamic Republic.
So, initially, Hezbollah starts out as an export of the Iranian revolution. It starts out as fighting America first, and then it turns into what many
people in Lebanon described as national resistance, a legitimate resistance against Israeli occupation of South Lebanon. That image begins to change
after 2000, when Israel withdraws, and it changes dramatically after 2005, when Hezbollah finds itself involved in the killing of Lebanese citizens,
including former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri and a variety of other personalities in Lebanon.
Because -- and that's where the criticism against Hezbollah lies today, is that they have transformed into a group that uses violence not just to
liberate occupied land, but uses violence against its own people to hold on to power.
SREENIVASAN: OK. In 2023, Hezbollah joined the conflict between Israel and Hamas. Nearly a year later, Israel conducted several attacks against
Hezbollah, famously the coordinated Pager attack that killed a dozen people, injured more than 3,000 people. Then there was a series of military
strikes that even took out the leader, Hassan Nasrallah. The impression at the time was that Hezbollah was significantly weakened. Is that true?
GHATTAS: That was the assessment of Israel at the time, that they had been incapacitated up to 70 percent, and that the rest of the 30 percent should
be handled by the Lebanese authorities to make sure that Hezbollah would no longer represent a threat on Israel's border. The Lebanese government today
is being criticized for not having done enough to make sure that Hezbollah no longer has the capacity to strike Israel.
But what is being asked of the Lebanese government and the Lebanese army, which is to disarm, forcibly disarm Hezbollah, I think is wrongheaded,
including today, because it can lead to internal strife and violence. We're hearing today from Hezbollah officials threatening the Lebanese government
for its criticism of Hezbollah's actions and for its call for the departure of Iranian Revolutionary Guards and the Iranian ambassador.
So, the Lebanese government is stuck between not even a rock and a hard place, but a rock and a rock between Israel's actions and Hezbollah's
threats and Iran's agenda in Lebanon. Can it do more? Can the Lebanese government do more? I think so. But I also think that the International
Community should assist the Lebanese authorities to make sure that they can provide for the citizens at this very dire time and offer an alternative to
Hezbollah when it comes to the Shia community.
And also, one more point, Hari, the Lebanese government has offered to enter into direct negotiations with Israel, which was a historic first
since the 1980s. And it's something that is divisive inside Lebanon. Why would we negotiate while we're being bombed? Hezbollah, as I said, is
attacking the Lebanese government. But it is a step that is worthwhile supporting when it comes to the International Community.
[13:50:00]
SREENIVASAN: There have been statements by members of the Israeli government just earlier this week, where the defense minister, Israel Katz,
said Israel will occupy southern Lebanon up to the Litani River to create a defensive buffer. And Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, the Litani
River must become our new border with the state of Lebanon. So, is the point here to try to increase a geographic buffer for the safety of Israel,
or is this a land grab?
GHATTAS: It's a land grab. It's a land grab. And there are deep fears in Lebanon that Israel's militaristic, expansionist approach to its regional
policy is going to lead to this land grab in southern Lebanon. And again, I want to emphasize, Israel occupied southern Lebanon before, and it did not
work out. It did not bring safety to northern Israel.
And that's why, eventually, in 2000, Prime Minister Ehud Barak, at the time, decided to withdraw. He withdrew unilaterally. And I know that the
reaction in Israel is, you know, we withdrew, and we left, and we gave you back your land, and all we got was rockets. But unilateral withdrawals are
not a recipe for long-term, sustainable diplomatic solutions, which is why today it is historic that the Lebanese government is offering these
negotiations.
You have to remember that this land grab, you know, 10, 20, 30 kilometers into Lebanon, is below the range of Hezbollah's rockets. So, you know, if
things go terribly wrong, and the Lebanese government is not able to assert its authority on the whole of Lebanon's territory, you could have Hezbollah
rockets still landing in northern Israel, even if there is this buffer zone.
And again, I want to emphasize that for the long-term, you need to have diplomatic conversations. And it is a breach of international law to occupy
and, you know, grab land like that, whether it's for your safety or for whatever reason the Israeli officials are mentioning.
SREENIVASAN: Has the Lebanese government taken steps to delegitimize Hezbollah and try to decrease the influence of Iran?
GHATTAS: Absolutely. As I mentioned, they have, first of all, declared Hezbollah's military and security activities to be outside of the law. They
have arrested several members of Hezbollah and put them through trial in a military tribunal. You know, for some, it looks mostly symbolic, but it is
still something. They have, as I said, called on Iranian Revolutionary Guards to leave the country. And now, they have asked the Lebanese -- the
Iranian ambassador to leave Lebanon, as well.
And then you have the two big Shia parties, Hezbollah, but also Amal, which belongs to -- which is led by Nabih Berri, speaker of parliament, who have
come out and said, we refuse to see the Iranian ambassador leave the country. So, this is not just a war that Israel is waging against Lebanon.
It is not just a war that Iran is conducting via Lebanon. It is also a war, a battle for Lebanese sovereignty.
And I hope that the Lebanese government will not step back from its demand that the Iranian ambassador leave the country. But I also know that
Hezbollah could deploy violence internally to impose their vision for how this should go forward. And they've done this before in Lebanon, using
violence against the Lebanese and the Lebanese state.
SREENIVASAN: Journalist and author Kim Ghattas, thanks so much for your time.
GHATTAS: Thanks for having me.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
AMANPOUR: And finally, in a moving tribute, the dazzling lights of Broadway and London's West End were dimmed last night in memory of Robert
Fox, one of the most distinguished theatre producers of his generation. As the lights went down, the cheering began as crowds gathered to pay him
tribute in London.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
(MUSIC PLAYING)
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: Family, friends and colleagues also sang Happy Birthday to mark what would have been Fox's 74th birthday. He died last week of cancer. His
wife, Fiona, shared these words with us.
[13:55:00]
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
FIONA GOLFAR, WIFE OF ROBERT FOX: He was a gentleman producer and this was his avenue for a long time, and New York and Broadway. And it's so
wonderful that everyone can come and pay. And his whole family are here, all his eight grandchildren and his five kids and the theatre community.
And we couldn't be prouder of the work that he's done.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AMANPOUR: His avenue, Shaftesbury Avenue there in London. And from "The Lady in the Van" to "The Boy from Oz" to the audience and "Frost/Nixon,"
Fox's work spanned decades across theatre, film and TV production. He collaborated with everyone from the Grand Dames, Maggie Smith and Helen
Mirren, to Hugh Jackman and Michael Sheen, to David Hare and David Bowie. His calming presence and creative mind will surely be missed by all of
those he worked with. May his soul bask in the footlights forever.
That's it for now. Thank you for watching, and goodbye from London.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[14:00:00]
END
