Return to Transcripts main page

CNN News Central

FBI Announces $50,000 Reward in Nancy Guthrie Case; No Suspect or Person of Interest Identified in the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie So Far; FBI Says Any Action Taken on Ransom is Ultimately Decided by the Family. Aired 1:30-2p ET

Aired February 05, 2026 - 13:30   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

[13:30:00]

SHERIFF CHRIS NANOS, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA: With the FBI here at the Tucson office. Heith Janke is the Special Agent in Charge for the state of Arizona out of Phoenix, and he will come up and speak.

HEITH JANKE, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE, FBI: Thank you, Sheriff. Hello. I'm Heith Janke, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Phoenix Division. First, I want to let the Guthrie family know that our hearts are heavy for them.

After seeing your message last night, it is clear that you and your family are in pain. Please know that we are doing everything to bring your mother home. The FBI is now working this case jointly with the Pima County Sheriff's Department. And we're going to start today by announcing a $50,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of Nancy Guthrie and/or the arrest and conviction of anyone involved in her disappearance, and this will be the missing persons with the reward that will be going out.

The FBI has agents, analysts, and professional staff employees working day and night with our partners at the Sheriff's Department. We have deployed additional intelligence and agents from our Phoenix office. We have brought in our Critical Incident Response Group from Quantico, Virginia. Members from our Cellular Analysis Survey Team are here, and they continue to collect and process digital information.

We are actively reviewing and analyzing information from all digital sources, which includes banks, social media companies, phone companies, and any other organizations where a digital footprint could have been captured. All this information provides data points and helps put the picture together.

And we will be in the community continuing to conduct a thorough investigation with our partners. You heard about us out there last night. We will be back out there today. I would ask the media, give our investigators the space to do their jobs while they're out there.

Next, regarding the ransom letter. We are aware of a ransom letter that was sent to the local media and then to national outlets. As with every lead, we are taking it seriously. We are in communication with the family. And while we advise and recommend from a law enforcement perspective, any action taken on any ransom is ultimately decided by the family.

Thank you to those in the community that have called in TIPS. For anyone out there that may have information, no matter how small you think it may be, please report it. You can do so by calling 1-800- CALL-FBI or online at tips.fbi.gov.

My next message is to those imposters who are trying to take advantage and profit from this situation. We will investigate and ensure you are held accountable for your actions. We have made one arrest related to an imposter ransom demand, and a complaint will be presented to a magistrate judge later today. You will get more on that from the FBI and our U.S. Attorney's Office here in Arizona when it becomes available.

To anyone that may be involved, do the right thing. This is an 84- year-old grandma. This is an 84-year-old grandma that needs vital medication for her well-being. You still have the time to do the right thing before this becomes a much worse scenario for you. Please return Nancy home. Thank you.

NANOS: You have a list.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: All right. So you want to call them or me?

NANOS: You can call them.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: OK. So, the first person we are going to start with the list is going to be NBC National, Liz Kreutz.

LIZ KREUTZ, NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, NBC NEWS: Right here. Can you walk us through the timeline of -- from when you believe, if you look at this here, from 1:47 to 2:28, what do you think happened there, and what particular software would have detected somebody on camera?

NANOS: I don't -- I know we know the software that was there but I'm not -- sorry, I'm just not in the weeds. I know that the -- think of your doorbell cameras, somebody walks up, mine, my wife's, if I walk up, she gets an alert and it is usually something like that, a person is detected.

KREUTZ: So to understand, one (ph), does that mean that it was about a 45-minute span that this suspect or suspects would have been on the property? And then also, does this essentially mean that you've cooperated with the tech companies and you can officially say that no surveillance video is available from the home?

NANOS: We know that the tech company that we sent that camera off to, yes, they've said they've run out of ways to recover any video.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Next person is going to be ABC News' Aaron Katersky.

NANOS: Yeah, I'm sorry, it was 1:45 minutes.

KREUTZ: Can we say it's about a 45-minute span that somebody would have been on the property then from 1:47 to 2:28? NANOS: Yeah, I think those times speak for themselves, and it is about, like I say, those are approximates. So, yes.

[13:35:00]

I'm sorry, who was next did you say?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Aaron Katersky, ABC News.

AARON KATERSKY, CHIEF INVESTIGATIVE CORRESPONDENT, ABC NEWS: Hi, sir. Thanks for having me.

Is there information that you are purposely withholding because of the active investigation that might be leading you in a particular direction?

NANOS: You know, this is no different than any criminal investigation that we conduct here. Law enforcement has conducted investigations since 1865 here in Pima County. We're always mindful of what it is that's in front of us and what we should release and can release. There's legal guidelines that guide us, but there's also strategy too. So, you know, I'll leave that for you to determine.

KATERSKY: Now that you are having such an injection of manpower from the Pima Critical Incident Team and the FBI, would you (ph) slow to bring that in at the outset, should all of these resources be brought to bear sooner?

NANOS: I guess that, you know, it's Monday morning quarterbacking. I do it all the time, so you have the opportunity to do it for me. I'll take that hit.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: CBS News, Jonathan Vigliotti.

JONATHAN VIGLIOTTI, NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, CBS NEWS: Sheriff, over here. Has there been any proof of life, and has there been any sign of life?

NANOS: I'm going to -- anything to deal with the ransom notes and that, I would defer to the FBI. But no, to my knowledge, we're still looking for Nancy.

VIGLIOTTI: And for my follow-up question, if I can speak with the special agent, what was it about this apparent ransom note that now three days on, you first haven't been able to validate? And second, it warranted informing the Guthries of its existence?

JANKE: So the ransom note that was sent out there, obviously, every lead in this case, we are taking extremely serious.

VIGLIOTTI : But not everyone is presented to the family. Why this one?

JANKE: Because this was the ransom that came in, and it had facts associated with a deadline, with a monetary value they were asking for. So at that point -- VIGLIOTTI: What were some of those facts, if you can, because there's been a lot of speculation, as you know, if you could set the record straight.

JANKE: Yeah, the ransom itself, one talked about an Apple Watch, and one talked about a floodlight. We're not going to go into specifics. It's very important that we keep this investigation moving forward, and we don't want to put more facts out there that others then can use to try to profit from this.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: CNN -- next Ed Lavandera.

ED LAVANDERA, CNN SENIOR NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT : Agent, I want to follow-up with you real quick on that. There have been, as far as we know, I think, three ransom notes so far, one arrest. Are they all different? Do you think there's different authors behind all of them? Or --

JANKE: So the one that went to the media is the one we are currently investigating and working on. The imposter that I talked about where an arrest was made early this morning, that there would be more information.

We believe there's no evidence to connect this to Nancy's case. It was someone that was trying to profit from it, a total imposter.

LAVANDERA: And Sheriff, you started off the press conference by saying we believe that Nancy is still out there. Do you have reason to believe that she's still out there alive, or are you fearful of the worst-case scenario here that she won't be found alive?

NANOS: Well, I'm certainly fearful of that. I think we all are. But it is -- we operate from a position that until we know she's out there, she's alive, and we're going to continue thinking that way until we find her.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Fox Digital, Mike Ruiz.

MICHAEL RUIZ, INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER, FOX NEWS DIGITAL: Yes, sir. Michael Ruiz with Fox Digital.

Sheriff, you said you've identified no suspects. Have you ruled out anyone she was with on Saturday night?

NANOS: You know, we've talked to so many. I'm sure that my investigators have feelings about this one's clear or this one isn't. But, no, I wouldn't say anybody is ruled out yet, because what if I rule you out, and then later I learn something else? No.

RUIZ: So my follow-up, you mentioned that you don't know where the reporting of a forced entry came from. Do we know how whoever did this got into her house?

NANOS: That I would not discuss with you anyway.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Fox News, Paul Mauro. PAUL MAURO, CONTRIBUTOR, FOX NEWS: Question for Agent Edwards, if I may. Agent Edwards, will the Bureau be submitting the DNA for an investigative genealogical investigation relative to maybe getting a relative, somebody, if you will?

JOHN EDWARDS, ASSISTANT SPECIAL AGENT, FBI TUCSON OFFICE: I would say the DNA aspect of this case is being handled by the Pima County Sheriff's Department right now. However, should we get to that point, yes, that would be an option for the FBI to assist.

MAURO: And a quick follow-up. Does the ransom note that you're working establish any communication protocols in it?

[13:40:00]

JANKE: No, it does not. And that is what I think is important, that if someone has Nancy and is demanding the ransom, that there is communication with the family. We talked about -- there has been no proof of life, and there was no other demands within that letter. So they're still waiting for communication.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: ABC Affiliate, Ashley Holden.

ASHLEY HOLDEN, REPORTER, ABC15: Yeah, right here, Ashley Holden. When you say the doorbell camera was disconnected, do you believe that that camera was taken?

NANOS: We do not have it in our possession. We've not located it.

HOLDEN: And then a follow-up. I know that we've been hearing a lot about ransom notes. We were also hearing in that video that was put out by the Guthrie siblings, and I don't know if this is a question for the FBI or yourself, but the challenges of seeing an image and knowing that it's real. Could one of you address that? Has the family received correspondence in images, videos?

JANKE: So, we're not going to go into facts regarding this part of the investigation. I think part of that message was with A.I. these days, which you can make videos that appear to be very real. So, we can't just take a video and trust that that is a proof of life these days because of the advancements in A.I. and trying to actually get a proof of life that we can verify. But we're not going to go into anything the family may or may not have received.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: KOLD, Katherine Patterson.

KATHERINE PATTERSON, REPORTER, KOLD: So in regards to a timeline on that ransom note, is that being an impact in your investigation? Are we nearing that timeline?

NANOS: I'm sorry. One more time.

PATTERSON: So in regards to the timeline in the ransom note, are we nearing that timeline? And is that playing a part in the investigation? JANKE: We're not going to go, again, into specifics of that part of the investigation with the ransom note other than what we've put out there. We've been transparent. We're talking about -- we are working that ransom demand, but we don't want to go anything further than that, that could impact any opportunity. So thank you.

PATTERSON: And is there any additional physical evidence at the crime scene other than the technology that you guys are using for this timeline? Is there anything else that's helping you guys other than really the technology?

NANOS: Well, I think I said on day one is that it is technology that's going to really help us solve this case. But, no, I mean, you know, we did do a process of that scene for biological evidence, so we're still hopeful that maybe something will show up there as well.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Arizona Republic, Richard Ruelas.

RICHARD RUELAS, REPORTER, THE ARIZONA REPUBLIC: For Agent Janke.

JANKE: Yes.

RUELAS: We saw on the scene, I believe it was you, taking a tripod into the home of the sister. How involved was the FBI, if at all, in creating the video? Any advice for the family?

JANKE: I would say we use our expertise and provide consultation and advice any time a family would ask for our advice in a kidnapping. It's ultimately the family's decision of what they put out and any messages they put out. But we were -- obviously, you're all documenting every move we make. We were there last night in -- talking with the family. But every decision is theirs.

RUELAS: Right. It was a tripod (inaudible). Sheriff Nanos, you said the blood was found on the porch and on the front stoop. Just wanted to verify that.

NANOS: I say porch, front stoop. It's all in that same general area by the front door.

RUELAS: In front of the house?

NANOS: Front door, yes.

RUELAS: Given her medical condition and the fact that it was her blood, as you say, what would her medical condition do with her recovery if she had bled out, or was bleeding when she left the house?

NANOS: Well, again, I've got to be careful for HIPAA, but I would say this. We know she is in need of medication, daily medication, and we also know that this is day four or five, and still we don't know that she's getting her medication. That could in itself prove fatal.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: That'll be the last question. For KGUN News, we have Craig Smith or Athena?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I'll get that for you.

NANOS: Craig?

ATHENA KEHOE, REPORTER, KGUN: KGUN, Athena.

NANOS: OK.

KEHOE: Have you been in communication with anyone who you believe could be the kidnapper?

NANOS: You know, it goes back to what we talked about. Nobody is eliminated, but we just really don't have enough to say, this is our suspect, this is our guy, we know our gal. We just don't know that. And it's really kind of reckless to report that someone is a suspect when they could very well be a victim.

[13:45:00]

I bring to you, to the media, I plead with you to be careful of what it is we put out there because we don't have anybody here listed as a suspect, and you could actually be doing some damage to the case, but you could do some damage to that individual too. Social media is kind of an ugly world sometimes.

KEHOE: And how far out have you expanded your search, can you say?

NANOS: You know, I would tell you this. Look, nothing is off the table. If we get a lead that there's somebody, hey, you've got this over here or over here, we're going. And that will expand and expand and expand. I think the FBI, with their billboards, they're now planning to put those up at every state around here, at all of our neighboring states.

So, yeah, we use you, the national media, the FBI with their national outreach to affect that for us. But as far as the actual investigation, naturally, the home, the scene is the primary, and we just keep spreading it out as we get more and more leads.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Court TV, Cody Thomas.

CODY THOMAS, REPORTER, COURT TV: Hi there, Sheriff. Actually, my question is for Agent Janke. You know, we saw Savannah Guthrie and her siblings, family put out that video last night on Instagram, addressing the tragedy that it is, but also addressing the ransom letter saying they're ready to talk.

My question is, did the FBI or any other agency help them craft that message to put out on social media?

JANKE: Like I said to the previous question, we have an expertise when it comes to kidnappings. And when families want advice, consultation, expertise, we will provide that. But the ultimate decisions on what they say and how they put that out rests with the family itself.

THOMAS: And as far as suspects, I know we haven't identified one, but what type of suspect or suspects do we think we're dealing with here?

JANKE: At this time, like the Sheriff has said, there is no primary suspect identified, so it could run the gamut.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: KPNX, Troy Hayden.

TROY HAYDEN, NEWS ANCHOR, KPNX-TV: Are you actively investigating the son-in-law in this case? I know there were reports earlier this week and you refuted that. You said you haven't eliminated everybody. Have you eliminated him or come close to it, or are you actively looking at him?

NANOS: We're actively looking at everybody we come across in this case, everybody. We would be irresponsible if we didn't talk to everybody, the Uber driver, the gardener, the pool person, whoever, everybody. It is so cliche, but everybody is still a suspect in our eyes. That's just how we look at things and think as cops.

Does that mean we have a prime suspect? No. And the family has been very cooperative. They've done everything we've asked of them, and we want that relationship to continue. And sometimes people can be mean out there, and that can really harm us and harm our efforts.

HAYDEN: Did you find blood anywhere else in the home besides the porch?

NANOS: The only DNA evidence we've got back is on the porch. Look, we prioritize things and we rush things, and those items we put out to a lab to rush it. And even then, it's two, three, four days. The other items could take 10 days, 20 days, but we saw the importance of that blood. It came back to Nancy.

HAYDEN: So it was only there, it wasn't anywhere else in the house?

NANOS: I don't know that. We processed the house for biological evidence, and we've not gotten anything back.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Newsmax, Sarah Williamson.

SARAH WILLIAMSON, REPORTER, NEWSMAX: Hi there. My question is just piggybacking off our colleagues here about how far this search has gone. When it comes to doorbell cameras, you say technology plays a critical role in this. Have you been actively door-knocking the neighbors and businesses and collecting those doorbell cameras? And is there anything that has come up there?

NANOS: I can't tell you whether things have come up or not, but we have door-to-door, I think we're still doing door-to-door, not just in that neighborhood but other neighborhoods. Just as leads come in and take us somewhere, we're going to do those things.

WILLIAMSON: OK. And just to follow-up as well in regards to the video that was released by Nancy Guthrie's children last night. Just to clarify, that was not coordinated with any law enforcement beforehand, and you hadn't seen that video before it was released?

NANOS: The FBI is handling all things with the ransom.

JANKE: I think the answer was yes, we were there. The media was there. While we can help coordinate and provide that consultation, but that is the family's decision of what they film and what they put out. So --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Fox 10, Justin Lum.

JUSTIN LUM, REPORTER, FOX 10: Agent Janke, this one is for you. Following up on that video that was released yesterday, it said, you know, ultimately, any further action is decided on by the family. Since then, have they expressed any more interest in more efforts to try and get in contact with who is behind the ransom letter?

[13:50:00]

And do you have a crisis or any sort of hostage negotiator with your team for that type of situation if it moves forward?

JANKE: So the two parts of that question, I think it's pretty clear the family wants to be contacted. They know time is of the essence, and if those that may have Nancy are watching this, the family is ready to talk, get proof of life, because there has been no contact after that ransom note went to the media.

For your second question, yes, we have crisis negotiators. That is part of our team here locally, along with the personnel we brought in from Quantico, and they will be part of it. But we're not going to go beyond that of any specifics.

LUM: Taking down the crime scene perimeter after Monday's investigation and really opening access to that property to everyone else, was that something you would do differently, looking back, knowing that federal authorities also conducted a search yesterday? Would you have kept that perimeter up knowing that?

NANOS: You know, Monday morning quarterback, I probably would have, but I'll say this. We processed the scene. We got what we thought was complete. My team did that. I have to have all the faith and trust in their abilities and their skills, and I think they went through that pretty well. But because another agency now steps in and wants to assist, we're -- just like with you, we're an open book.

Absolutely. How can we help? One of the things people don't see, I heard your question about, you know, we left and then others could walk up. You know, when we process a scene and we're done, we return that scene to the, in this case, the homeowners, the family.

And we don't just go march back in there. We call the family again and get permissions to go back to the home. So, yeah, there's -- again, Monday morning quarterback, absolutely, I probably could have held off on that.

We knew the FBI. We've worked with them before in a lot of cases, and we felt like they could be of help in this with particularly the forensic analysis we use in a number of things. But we, at the start of this thing, we weren't sure what we had, and as the day progressed, we realized that there could be more to this, and we started in that.

Remember, it was a search and rescue mission the first few hours. And we transitioned that over to a criminal investigation. With that, brought in our partners from the FBI and others.

Have you heard from President Trump on resources?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Claudia Ramos, Univision. Univision, Claudia Ramos.

CLAUDIA RAMOS, NEWS CORRESPONDENT, UNIVISION: I was actually going to ask about that. We saw the message yesterday.

NANOS: Are you next?

RAMOS: Claudia Ramos, yes, Univision.

NANOS: OK, I'm sorry.

RAMOS: Following up on that, we saw the message from the president yesterday. Have you personally received any communication from him or others?

NANOS: No, no, and I wouldn't expect that. He, too, is a busy man, right? And I would say this. We thank him for his entire law enforcement team, as was put out yesterday. And we know, you know, I know my local reporters here know. We've always worked well with all of our partners in law enforcement.

Maybe it's something unique to southern Arizona, and the rest of the country doesn't see that. But this isn't new for us. We've done this. Gabby Giffords, I headed up that investigation many years ago, and we worked side by side. Could not have got things done if we weren't with the FBI on that.

RAMOS: And just the other question, this being a border state, have you guys had any communication with Mexican authorities?

NANOS: I have not. I work closely with the Mexican Consulate, as other consulates, being the Sheriff. But, no, I have not heard from them.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Arizona Univision, Mon Reese (ph).

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Hi, Sheriff. My question is, do you know -- it's a two-part question, do you know what medication Nancy uses? And have you checked local pharmacies and pharmacies around the state where they bought or saved this medication to keep her alive, to keep her healthy, while still looking for her?

NANOS: So we do know what medications. And we have contacted pharmacies. Probably need to go back to just make sure that they didn't -- maybe we contacted them early on. I know that night, Sunday night, Saturday night, Sunday morning, I know we were doing all the hospital checks. And that check was continuous every hour, going back out. And physically in person, deputies were going to each local area hospital and asking them to check their logs.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: My second question here is, I know you're looking for her in Pima County. Are you looking for her across the state now? And if so, is there a particular area that you're focusing on right now?

[13:55:00]

NANOS: We're looking for her everywhere, right? The FBI just made an arrest on a tip that we got that we thought, there could be something here. Yeah, it's statewide. The billboards are going to be out there across the country. We take leads from everywhere. Where those leads take us, we'll get there.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: MS NOW, Alex Tabet.

ALEX TABET, REPORTER, MS NOW: Do you have any reason to believe that Nancy Guthrie may be being held outside of the country? Is that something that you've ruled out at this point?

JANKE: We don't have any of that information. We haven't ruled anything out. Like the sheriff said, we will follow the facts wherever they take us. Whether it is outside of the state of Arizona or over the border, we will follow the facts and go there. But we have no indication of anything over the Mexican border.

TABET: And you mentioned on the ransom note, there were details about the Apple Watch and the floodlight.

JANKE: Yeah.

TABET: The ransom notes that were sent out to TMZ, KGUN, and KOLD, are they all the same ransom note? Do they contain the same details in each of those individual ransom notes?

JANKE: The ones that I am tracking and aware of were the same that went to TMZ also.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: News Nation, Brian Entin.

BRIAN ENTIN, SENIOR NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT, NEWS NATION: Agent Janke, when did the first ransom note arrive? And the reason I ask is because the Apple Watch has been in the news and on social media, and you could see floodlights on video.

JANKE: Yeah.

ENTIN: So was it before those things were out in the world?

JANKE: I don't have the specific time frame, as I said here today, of what time it came in. But that, you are right. Anyone could see a floodlight hanging down, could have seen some of those things. The watch has been talked about. So that timing is tricky, but that's why we're taking it serious no matter what and following the leads on that. But I don't have the time frame that the first note came in, as I said here today. Thank you.

ENTIN: And my follow-up is for the sheriff. In the house, were there any signs that someone tried to clean up or maybe destroy evidence?

NANOS: I can't talk about the crime scene, so I'll give you another shot, another question.

ENTIN: My other question is I heard the agency say that it was a joint investigation now. At the other press conference, the FBI said they were assisting. Is it joint now? Are both agencies in charge now?

NANOS: Look, there's no ego here. We in this part of the country, we'll take anybody's help. It's not about who is in charge. From day one, when we contacted the FBI, they were that gracious to say, whatever you need, whatever you need.

And so that's really it. And they're great partners, just as my other local law enforcement brethren there. I didn't even have to ask. That's what's really amazing. I haven't had to call anybody. They've called me. Sheriff, what do you need?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Arizona's Family, Briana Whitney.

BRIANA WHITNEY, REPORTER, ARIZONA'S FAMILY: Hi, Sheriff. I know you had the crime scene processed. You said you went back out there. Your partners wanted to see it. But you guys were actively taking out evidence yesterday.

Was there something you missed the first time, or did you have a piece of information that led you to believe you needed to go back out and take more than you had that first day?

NANOS: You know, I know that we get information that will come, and this is just any crime scene that we look at. We may go out to a crime scene and think we've got it all. Go analyze the evidence and something comes back and says, hey, did you check this? We're not going to just say, oops, and not go. Absolutely.

WHITNEY: Did anything (ph) come in?

NANOS: In this instance, it really was the FBI just wanted to go, hey, can we take a look at it?

WHITNEY: Were you worried about that being contaminated at all because there was people in that house?

NANOS: You know, I'll let the courts worry about that. We will certainly be open to the courts of anything that's been removed from that house, and we follow the rules of laws. We get court orders and go back and reapply for another warrant if need be. All of those things we're very careful of.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Arizona Public Media, L. M. Boyd. L. M. BOYD, SENIOR REPORTER, ARIZONA PUBLIC MEDIA: L. M. Boyd over here. In that news release yesterday, there was a report of a trespasser. Has the Guthrie family dealt with any incidents, threats, whether that's trespassing, social media threats, anything of that nature?

NANOS: I am not aware of any of that. I know that we -- as with any case, again, we would look at all of the background of calls to those families or their residents, and see if there's anything there or even in that neighborhood. Those things have been looked at. I don't know of anything that was reported in even the last 30 days or 60 days. Nobody's come to me and said, hey, next door you had a burglary.

BOYD: A follow-up, for the neighborhood where Nancy's home is, can you give any more details on that trespassing incident?

NANOS: I don't have them.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Dela Mundo, Jesus Gonzalez (ph).

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This is for the FBI. I just have a question. Can you confirm if the FBI Director is coming for investigation?