Return to Transcripts main page
CNN Newsroom
Live Report of Obama Taking Reporter Questions Following the G20
Aired June 27, 2010 - 18:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
DREW GRIFFIN, CNN ANCHOR: There you have a live picture from Toronto, at the podium, at the Metro Convention Center, right along the waterfront in Canada, in Toronto, where the president will be talking about what this summit has brought in terms of changes in the finances of the 20 largest economies in the country.
We have Ali Velshi standing by, our chief business correspondent. Also, Jeanne Meserve is there. We're going to be talking with both of them very shortly as we await President Obama's news conference.
But, first, top stories.
Senator Robert Byrd, the longest serving member of Congress in history, has been admitted to a Washington area hospital and it is serious. His office says the 92-year-old West Virginia Democrat was admitted last week. Initially, it was believed to be just heat exhaustion and severe dehydration. But doctors now say other conditions have developed and he is now described as, quote, "seriously ill." Byrd was elected to the Senate in 1958. That was after serving six years in the House.
The office of former Vice President Dick Cheney says his condition has, quote, markedly improved and his daughter Liz Cheney says it looks like her father will leave the hospital tomorrow. The 69-year-old Cheney was admitted to George Washington Hospital on Friday because of progressive fluid retention related to his heart disease. Family friend says Cheney was suffering from an irregular heart rhythm. He's had five heart attacks -- the first when he was 37 years old.
Well, Alex is now a tropical depression and it looks like it will not -- will not -- hit the leak area in the Gulf but it could pick up strength as it moves past the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico and head into the western Gulf. If Alex does change course, it could be big trouble for the oil containment efforts. Crews have to evacuate, take a lot of their equipment with them, and if that happens, it could take two weeks to get everything back in place.
The president's Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow. Judging by what we've heard today, confirmation will not be a cakewalk.
The ranking Republican Jeff Sessions says Kagan has serious deficiencies, citing what he called her liberal leanings and the fact she's never been a judge. He's not ruling out a Republican filibuster. Democrats claim Kagan is qualified, brilliant, and mainstream.
And as we stand by for the president's news conference, there's been a lot of high-level talks about the global economy of the summit.
CNN's chief business correspondent Ali Velshi is standing by.
Ali, we heard a lot of talk about getting global deficits under control. The "Globe and Mail" is reporting that Stephen Harper up there has got some kind of an agreement that that's actually going to happen.
ALI VELSHI, CNN CHIEF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT: Yes, let me set the stage for you, Drew. I'm here in Toronto, right behind me, the lake is right behind. About a mile and a half, you can see the CN Tower, the big tower there. That's where they're meeting.
President Obama, that shot you got, you had up a minute ago, that's the podium. He's coming up to it right now. Let's listen in to the president's closing comments at the G-20, Drew.
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Please, everybody have a seat.
Good evening. I want to thank or wonderful hosts. First and foremost, my friend and partner, Prime Minister Harper, as well as the Canadian people and the people of Toronto for their extraordinary hospitality. The success of these summits, the G-8 in Muskoka and the G-20 here in Toronto, is a tribute to Canadian leadership. I also want to thank my fellow leaders for the sense of purpose that they brought to this summit.
The G-20 is now the premier form for international economic cooperation. We represent east and west, north and south, advanced economies and those still emerging. Our challenges are as diverse as our nations. But together, we represent some 85 percent of the global economy. And we had forged a coordinated response to the worst global economic crisis in our time.
In London last year, we took unprecedented action to prevent an even larger economic catastrophe, to put our economies on the path to recovery and to begin reforming our financial system so that the crisis -- like the one we were emerging from -- never happened again.
In Pittsburgh, we went further, moving beyond the old economic cycles of boom-and-bust, by committing our nations to a new framework for growth that's balanced and sustained, as well as specific financial reforms. Our bold action has succeeded.
And the United States, we are committed above all to leading by example. Because of the steps that we've taken to get our economy moving, we are growing again and this growth is beginning to translate into job creation. And we're now poised to pass the toughest financial reform since the aftermath of the Great Depression.
Globally, economic contraction has given way to economic growth. Trade that had plummeted is rebounding. Emerging economies in particular are seeing impressive growth. So, we have pulled ourselves back from the brink and begun to move forward with economic recovery.
But, as we all know, that's not good enough. In the United States and around the world, too many people are still out of work. And too many economies, demand for goods and services is still too weak.
As we've been reminded in recent months, financial crisis in one country can have consequences far beyond its borders. And history teaches us that growth and prosperity is never guaranteed. It requires constant effort and it requires continued leadership.
So, we came to Toronto with three specific goals: to make sure the global recovery is strong and durable, to continue reforming the financial system, and to address the range of global issues that affect our prosperity and security -- and we've made progress in each of these areas.
First, to ensure the recovery is strong and durable, we agreed to continue coordinating our efforts so we're creating jobs. That's my highest economic priority as president. And this is why we are focused on increasing global demand. Every economy's unique and every country will chart its own unique course. But make no mistake: we are moving in the same direction.
As I reiterated to my colleagues, after years of taken on too much debt, Americans cannot and will not borrow and buy the world's way to lasting prosperity. No nation should assume its path to prosperity is simply paved with exports to the United States.
Indeed, I've made it clear that the United States will compete aggressively for the jobs and industries and markets of the future. That's why I've set the goal of doubling our exports over the next five years, an increase that would support millions of jobs in the United States. That's why I've launched a national export initiative to help meet this goal.
That's why we focused earlier this week in deepening our economic cooperation with Russia, which would benefit both of our countries, including restarting our poultry exports, and accelerating our efforts to support Russian's entry into the WTO.
And that's why I announced that my administration will work to resolve outstanding issues regarding the United States-Korea free trade agreement by the time that I visit Korea in November. This will create new jobs and opportunities for people in both our countries and enhance America's competitiveness in the 21st century.
A strong and durable recovery also requires countries not having an undue advantage. So, we also discuss the need for currencies that are market-driven. As I told President Hu yesterday, the United States welcomes China's decision to allow its currency to appreciate in response to market forces. And we will be watching closely in the months ahead.
And because a durable recovery must also include fiscal responsibility, we agreed to balance the need for continued growth in the short-term and fiscal sustainability in the medium-term. In the United States, I've set a goal of cutting our deficit in half by 2013. A number of our European partners are making difficult decisions. But we must recognize that our fiscal health tomorrow will rest in no small measure on our ability to create jobs and growth today.
The second area we focused on was advancing the goal of financial reform. Just as we're on the verge of passing financial reforms in the United States, our European partners have committed to the process we went through in the United States: a new level of transparency and a stress test for banks to rebuild confidence.
Here in Toronto, we reaffirmed our commitment to the highest global standards. To maintain momentum, we directed our teams to finalize for our meeting in Seoul a global framework to ensure that banks hold enough capital to withstand the stresses of government intervention.
Rules must be clear. Oversight must be strong. Complex trades like derivatives must be brought into the light of day. Excessive risk-taking and abusive practices must be prevented. Consumers must be protected.
In short, we have to do everything in our power to avoid a repeat of the recent financial crisis.
Finally, we made progress on a range of global challenges that are critical to shared prosperity. We're moving forward with the food security initiative that we announced last year, including by launching a special fund at the World Bank, which will strengthen farmers' productivity in the poorest countries. And we made progress towards a new coordinated approach so that we can invest more than $20 billion to reduce hunger and promote agricultural development.
The G-20 leaders renewed our commitment made in Pittsburgh to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. The United States has laid out our plans for achieving this goal and we're urging our G-20 partners to do so well. This will be one of the most important steps we can take to create clean energy jobs, increase our energy security and address the threat of climate change.
And I'm pleased we endorsed my proposal to broaden the G-20 agenda to include the fight against corruption. In too many places, the culture of the bribe is a break on development and prosperity. It discourages entrepreneurship, destroys public trust, and undermines the rule of law while stifling economic growth. With the new commitment to strengthening and enforcing rules against corruption, economic opportunity and prosperity will be more broadly shared.
Let me conclude by saying that I know that much of the focus coming into these meetings was on whether our nations would be divided by different approaches. But as we've proven repeatedly over the past 18 months, our nations can and have come together through the G-20 to build on the foundation of our shared interests. Indeed, that's the purpose of these meetings.
We can bridge our differences. We can coordinate our approaches. And we can continue our relentless focus on durable growth that puts our people to work and broadens prosperity for the world.
So, with that, let me take a few questions. I've got a handy list here and I'm going to start with Darlene from "A.P."
REPORTER: Thank you, Mr. President.
Do you think the decision by your G-20 counterparts here to endorse stiff deficit reduction goals is a repudiation of your view that cutting deficits too quickly and too fast would hinder the global economic recovery?
And then, if I could ask you just quickly on North Korea, you said yesterday that North Korea must be held to account for the sinking of the South Korean warship and that there must be consequences for such irresponsible behavior. What specifically, what kind of punishment would you like to see imposed on North Korea short of some sort of condemnation from the U.N. Security Council?
OBAMA: OK.
REPORTER: Thank you.
OBAMA: Darlene, since you're the first, I'm going to give you two questions. Everybody else, let's try to stick to one, please, especially big questions.
With respect to the first question, we helped to draft this communique which reflects our policies. I know leading up to the conference, leading up to the summit, there was some sense of a divide. In fact, the policies that we've been promoting are reflected in the communique and entirely consistent with what the G-20 leaders came up with.
Keep in mind that we had already proposed a long time ago that we were going to cut our deficits in half by 2013. And so, the time frame and the measures that have been adopted are consistent with our view that it is important for us to make sure that in the medium and long-term, we are paying attention to the big deficits and debts that we have out there.
What we did say coming to this conference is we can't all rush to the exits at the same time, so countries have that surpluses should think about how can they spur growth and how can they spur demand. Not all of those involve stimulus. Some of them might involve structural changes in their economies. Some of them might involve passing financial regulatory reforms so that their banks are lending again.
But the point is that in each country, what we have to recognize is that the recovery is still fragile, that we still have more work to do to make this recovery durable, but we also have to recognize that if markets are skittish and don't have confidence that we can tackle the tough problems of our medium and long-term debt and deficits, then that also is going to undermine our recovery.
Now, there are going to be some countries, Greece being the most obvious example, that has to act immediately because they're facing a sovereign debt crisis. There are going to be other countries where the issue really has to do with how do we start putting in place some plans that are credible for deficit reduction, even though they don't kick in significantly in this first year.
So, for example, Germany, which cares deeply, obviously, about the issue of fiscal consolidation. If you actually look at their plans, they're no more front-loaded than ours are. In fact, you could make the argument that some of the steps that I've already taken, freezing domestic discretionary spending for the next three years in my budget, passing PAYGO, setting up a fiscal commission to tackle issues like entitlements long term -- that many of those decisions are comparable to some of the decisions that have been made by those who are promoting fiscal consolidation.
So, I think this has been an issue in which there is violent agreement between the parties. We have to make sure we're not rushing to the exits too quickly and all at the same time, but we also have to be mindful that the debt and deficit levels that many advanced countries have right now are unsustainable and have to be dealt with in a serious way.
With respect to North Korea, our main focus right now is in the U.N. Security Council, making sure that there is a crystal-clear acknowledgement that North Korea engaged in belligerent behavior that is unacceptable to the international community. And, you know, if the United States participated in the investigation that was conducted around the Cheonan, our experts concluded that North Korea had carried out that attack. That was consistent with South Korea's assessment and others who were observers in the process.
I think President Lee has shown extraordinary restraint given these circumstances and it is absolutely critical that the international community rally behind him and send a clear message to North Korea that this kind of behavior is unacceptable and that the international community will continue to step up pressure until it makes a decision to follow a path that is consistent with international norms.
And my expectation is, is that those who were here at the G-20, as they look at the evidence, will come to that same conclusion. I think it is a bad habit that we need to break to try to shy away from ugly facts with respect to North Korea's behavior in the interests of, or under the illusion that that will somehow help to maintain the peace.
All right, Hans.
REPORTER: Thank you, Mr. President. Before the summit, you said it was too early to tell if China's revaluation of their RMB would lead to real evaluation. You suggested that you take a year to look at the trajectory to see whether or not it was real. You've just said a couple of months.
OBAMA: Did I -- did I say a year at the press conference in the White House? REPORTER: On the 24th with Medvedev, you -- you said it would take a year.
OBAMA: Did I say a year?
REPORTER: It will take a year to monitor the RMB. That was the trajectory.
OBAMA: OK.
REPORTER: I just want to know if there's a reason for a change --
OBAMA: No, you know --
REPORTER: -- in the intervening time?
OBAMA: Look, the -- I'd have to look at the transcript, but let me just make sure that I'm absolutely clear.
Number one: China has determined that it is in its own interests, its own sovereign interests, to move back towards a path of flexible exchange rates. We think that is a very positive thing. We think, in part, it is a positive thing because an undervalued RMB has given China a significant trading advantage and we have been very clear to them that we don't consider that acceptable or consistent with the principles of balanced and sustainable growth that were discussed in Pittsburgh and that all G-20 countries signed on to.
So, we are pleased that they've made this first step, but like, I think, a number of other countries, a number of other trading partners with China, you know, the proof of the pudding is going to be in the eating. We didn't expect a 20 percent revaluation in a week. That would be disruptive to the Chinese economy. It would be disruptive to the world economy.
We do expect that, as more and more market forces come to bear, that given the enormous surpluses that China has accumulated, that the RMB is going to go up and it's going to go up significantly. And so, we are going to be paying attention over the next several months, to make that determination.
Now, I don't have a perfect formula. Will I have a clear idea after three months as to whether it's moving fast enough or not? I will leave that up to Treasure Secretary Geithner, who makes these determinations. That's not my job.
REPORTER: How long do you expect people like Senator Charles Schumer and American manufacturers who have lost so many jobs so quickly, how long do you expect them to wait?
OBAMA: Well, Hans, we're not going to have a colloquy here. The -- but, you know, my expectations is that they're going to be serious about the policy that they themselves have announced.
Now, what I'm going to do is I'm going to work with people like Senator Schumer, manufacturers, workers, who are affected by these trade imbalances, and I think we all have the same interest, and that is the United States can complete with anybody as long as we've gone an even playing field. And as I indicated in my opening remarks, we're prepared to enter into trade agreements with Korea. One of the things we discussed here was: is there a way to reinvigorate the Doha Round which has been stuck for a very long time.
So, I agree with the statement in the communique that trade can be a source of prosperity for everybody, but it's got to be a fair deal. And it's not just currency, by the way. I mean, you know, we've had discussions with our Chinese partners about what are they doing on non-tariff barriers? What are they doing with respect to intellectual property protection? What are they doing with respect to state-owned enterprises or state-owned banks that are subsidizing industry?
So, there are a whole host of issues. Now, undoubtedly, they've got some issues with us and I think we can manage these trade frictions, but it's going to be important, I think, for China to take seriously not just what we're saying but what a number of countries, including countries like Canada, are saying. All right?
Jackie. Where are you at?
REPORTER: Right here. Thank you, Mr. President.
One of the noneconomic issues you covered here was Afghanistan. And I'm curious whether you believe that the talks that Pakistan is reportedly brokering between the Taliban and President Karzai of Afghanistan hold promise or do they concern you?
And a related question, not a second question, is: do you agree with the new prime minister of Great Britain, David Cameron -- David to you -- that we can be totally out of Afghanistan by 2015 and turn the lights off?
OBAMA: I'm not sure that's quote from David, but I'll take the second question first.
We have been in Afghanistan now for nine years. Next year, we will have been there for a decade. This is now America's longest war and what that means is that all of us have an interest not in occupying Afghanistan but an interest in making sure Afghanistan is stable, can stand on its own two feet when it comes to security issues, and is not a base for terrorist activities launched against the United States of America.
Now, I think that we're going to need to provide assistance to Afghanistan for a long time to come. You know, they are still building up a national government. They are in a very tough neighborhood. They are a very poor country.
So, on a whole range of issues, from economic, development, setting up courts, setting up effective police forces, a political system that is transparent and fair, as well as with respect to security, we intend to be a partner with Afghanistan over the long term -- but that is different from us having troops on the ground.
Now, I've been clear about the policy that we're pursuing. It was announced last November and we're several months into it. The policy involves us sending in additional troops. We already had approximately 68,000. We put in an additional 30,000. With the intent of providing the Afghan government the space and the time to build up its security forces, for us to be able to help blunt the momentum of the Taliban, to clear some of the areas in which the Taliban had gotten a very fierce foothold, to start moving Afghan security forces in even as we are improving governance and we're improving the legitimacy and credibility of the civilian government.
That is the policy that General McChrystal was pursuing. That is the policy that General Petraeus is pursuing. That is the policy that all of our ISAF allies have fully endorsed, as has President Karzai.
Now, it's tough. It is a -- it is a tough challenge, for reasons that have been amply recorded. As I said, this is a -- the third poorest country in the world. It has an extraordinarily high illiteracy rate. It has suffered through 30 years of war.
And, so, this is going to be tough, but what I expect is that, by the end of this year, we will have seen progress on the strategy that was laid out. We will conduct a full review. Those things that are not working, we will fix. Those things that are working, we will build on, both on the civilian side and on the military side -- as well as on the diplomatic side. Because, ultimately, as is true in -- as was true in Iraq, so will be true in Afghanistan, we're going to have to have a political solution, not simply a military solution.
Now, with respect to the negotiations and efforts at reintegration, I think it's too early to tell. I think that we have to view these efforts with skepticism, but also openness. You know, the Taliban is a blend of hard-core ideologues, tribal leaders, kids that, basically, sign up because it's the best job available to them. Not all of them are going to be thinking the same way about the Afghan government, about the future of Afghanistan. And, so, we're going to have to sort through how these talks take place.
But I think that President Karzai's "Peace Jurga" was a useful step. He's going to have a Kabul conference that will be a useful step in this direction. I think that conversations between the Afghan government and Pakistani government, building trust between those two governments, is a useful step. I think to the extent that we can get all the regional players to recognize that it is in everybody's interests that this region, between Pakistan and Afghanistan, are not used to launch terrorist attacks, that will be a useful step and that's what we're moving towards.
Peter Meyer (ph). There you are.
REPORTER: Thank you, sir.
Looking ahead to the stream court confirmation hearings of your choice, Elena Kagan, tomorrow -- first of all, what do you say to the critics who are portraying her as a politically motivated liberal and, given your own support when you were in the Senate for filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee, what's your guidance to Republicans who may be threatening that at this point?
OBAMA: I think they should pay attention to Elena Kagan's record and her testimony. Under our constitutional system, the Senate is entrusted with the process of providing advice and consent.
And I am absolutely confident that if you give a fair reading of Elena Kagan's record, and her performance in every job that she's had, what you see is somebody with an extraordinarily powerful intellect, somebody with good judgment, somebody who understands the impact that laws have on individual Americans, somebody who's able to broker understandings between people of very difficult ideological bents, somebody who is extremely hard-working, extremely diligent, extremely personable, knows how to build consensus, has been an outstanding lawyer, has been an outstanding dean of one of our top law schools -- notice even though it's my alma mater, I just said "one of" -- has performed brilliantly as solicitor general, and has the support, by the way, of a number of very conservative jurists who she's worked with.
So, you know, as I examine some of the arguments that have been floated against her nomination over the last several weeks, it's pretty thin gruel. Having said, I expect that, you know, my Republican colleagues and my Democratic colleagues should ask her tough questions, listen to her testimony, go through the record, go through all the documents that have been provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and then vote their conscience.
Vote their conscience.
Mr. Kimura (ph), of "The Kyoto News"?
MR. KIMURA (ph), THE KYOTO NEWS: Thank you, Mr. President. I have a question with two parts, if I may.
(LAUGHTER)
OBAMA: But they're related.
KIMURA (ph): Yes, of course. Yes.
OBAMA: Yes.
(LAUGHTER)
KIMURA (ph): OK. The "Chona" (ph) incident once again indicated the instability of northeast Asia and the importance of the U.S.-Japan security treaty that just marked the 50 (INAUDIBEL). And you'll be meeting with new Prime Minister Kan after this. And on this occasion, would you please talk about your long-term vision on the alliance and the security treat. I mean, is this current structure of the treaty sustainable for the coming decades, especially with the Chinese military expansion and unpredictable North Korea? And --or would there be more responsibility required on the Japanese side. And the related second part of the question is, in your meeting with Hu Jintao yesterday, you called for cooperation from the Chinese side to send a clear message to North Korea as a consequence. How do you look at the response so far? Is it favorable and strong enough to send a united clear message to North Korea?
Thank you.
OBAMA: Let me answer the second question first. I had the conversation with President Hu. I was very blunt. This is not an issue where you've got two parties of moral equivalents who are having an argument. This is a situation in which you have a belligerent nation that engaged in provocative and deadly acts against the other. And I think it is very important that we are clear about that.
Now, I am sympathetic to the fact that North Korea is on China's border. They have a security interest in not seeing complete chaos on the Korean Peninsula or a collapse that could end up having a significant impact on them. And so I think the United States and the international community should be mindful that this is in China's backyard. And so, when they adopt a posture of restraint, I understand their thinking, but I think there's a difference between restraint and willful blindness to consistent problems.
And my hope is that President Hu will recognize as well that this is an example of Pyongyang going over the line in ways that just have to be spoken about seriously, because otherwise, we're not going to be able to have serious negotiations with the North Koreans. I like -- I think every participant in the six-party talks would love nothing more than to see these issues resolved diplomatically. So in that, China and the United States and Japan and South Korea and Russia all share a common interest. We'd like to see a denuclearized Korean Peninsula. We'd like to see a North Korea that is a responsible member of the world community, which would be good for the people of North Korea. But that's only going to happen if we're honest about what's tying place right now and if we're honest about our basic expectations of how nations behave in an international order.
With respect to the alliance between the United States and Japan, we mark 50 years. I expect that alliance to sustain itself for another 50 years. I think the condition of the alliance is very strong. I have already had the opportunity to meet with discuss issues with the new prime minister over the last several days. I think he is as committed as I am to making sure that the U.S.-Japan alliance remains strong and vibrant. It is good for Japan's security. It is good for America's security.
And, by the way, I think, again, it helps to serve China's interests and South Korea's interests. I think, rather than set it up as a rivalry, rather than see -- view this as an issue of spheres of influence, which is, I think, an old way of thinking, what we want to do is to say we are always going to be there for Japan, we are always going to be there for South Korea. We are going to be a presence in the Pacific because we are a Pacific nation as well as an Atlantic nation. But we want to partner with all countries to create an environment in which trade and commerce and the exchange of goods and people and ideas and cultures is thriving.
And, look, Asia is obviously on the move. China's on the move. That's a positive thing. That shouldn't be a threat to anybody. What we wanted to make sure of, though, is that, through dialogue, through forms like the G20, through forms like Astian (ph) or APEC or some of the other multilateral institutions that we've set up, that all countries are meeting their responsibilities, even as their rights are also being recognized.
And I think, if we adhere to that basic principle, then a strong U.S.-Japan alliance is something that can continue to be a cornerstone of a peaceful and prosperous Asia which will benefit all people. OK?
Dan Lothian from CNN?
DAN LOTHIAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Thank you, Mr. President. To follow up on Jackie's question, you talked about providing assistance in Afghanistan for some time to come. But given the challenges there and the history in Afghanistan, what makes you think that, after declaring victory in Afghanistan, that it won't slide back into becoming a haven for terrorists?
OBAMA: Well, I don't have a crystal ball. I think that, right now, the debate surrounding Afghanistan is presented as either we get up and leave immediately because there's no chance at a positive outcome, or we stay, basically, indefinitely and do, quote/unquote, "what it takes for as long as it takes." And what I said last year, I will repeat, which is, we have a vital national interest in making sure that Afghanistan is not used as a base to launch terrorist attacks. It is true that al Qaeda right now is in Pakistan. And you'll often hear, why are we in Afghanistan when the terrorists are in Pakistan. Well, al Qaeda in pinned down and has been weakened, in part, because they don't have the run of the territory. We would be less secure if you return to a situation that existed prior to 9/11 in which they had a government was friendly and willing to house their operations. And I don't think anybody would dispute that.
So, A, we've got a vital interest in the region. B, we do not expect, because of our involvement in Afghanistan, that the country is going to completely transform itself in a year or two years or five years. President Karzai does not expect that. The Afghan people don't expect that. Afghanistan has its own culture. It is a very proud culture. It has a lot of work to do with respect to development and it's going to have to find its own path.
But I reject the notion that the Afghan people don't want some of the basic things that everybody wants -- basic rule of law, a voice in governance, economic opportunity, basic physical security, electricity, roads, an ability to get a harvest to market and get a fair price for it, without having to pay too many bribes in between. And I think we can make a difference and the coalition can make a difference in them meeting those aspirations, even as we are meeting our security interests. Those two things are tied together.
Now, there has been a lot of obsession around this whole issue of, when do we leave? My focus right now is, how do we make sure that what we're doing there is successful, given the incredible sacrifices that our young men and women are putting in. And we have set up a mechanism whereby we are going to do a review. And I've signaled very clearly that we're not going to just keep on doing things if they're not working. And that by next year, we will begin a process of transition.
That doesn't mean that we suddenly turn off the lights and let the door close behind us. And if you look at what's happening in Iraq right now, we have met every deadline. By the way, there was a time table in place and we are -- we have, by the end of August, will have removed all of our combat troops from Iraq. We will maintain a military presence there. We will maintain military-to-military cooperation and we are providing them assistance, but we're meeting this dead line. And, you know, I think it is worth the extraordinary sacrifices that we are making -- and when I say "we," not just the United States, but all coalition members -- to try to see a positive outcome in Afghanistan as well. All right?
Last question -- Scott Horsley?
Where's Scott?
SCOTT HORSLEY, NPR NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Mr. President, are there steps your administration can take now to build confidence that the U.S. will, in fact, meet its deficit-reduction targets in the medium and long term.
OBAMA: I'm sorry, could you repeat the question? Put the mike a little closer to you.
HORSLEY: Are there steps your administration can take now to build confidence that the U.S. will, in fact, meet its definite reduction goals in the medium and long term?
OBAMA: There's several steps we've already begun to take. Number one, as I indicated, the budget that we're presenting, three- years discretionary domestic spending freeze. And I've sent a clear signal to the leadership, when we met, even if we do not get the entire budget package passed through Congress, that top-line number needs to stay firm. And I'm serious about it. We've initiated a whole host of measures to cut programs that aren't working, including, by the way, in the defense area. Bob Gates has been, I think, as successful as any secretary of defense in recent memory in actually killing programs which, I think, anybody who follows Washington knows is very difficult.
We have instituted Pay/Go. And although there were baselines built in that took into account the fact that some of this stuff was not going to be solved overnight, it is starting to provide budget discipline to Congress as they move forward.
And we have set up this fiscal commission who will provide reports, starting in November. And one of the encouraging things, although there was resistance, ironically, on the part of some of the Republicans who originally had been co-sponsors of legislation to create the fiscal commission, and they, in fact, ended up voting against it. What's been encouraging, based on what I'm hearing both from Democrats and Republicans, is that there's been a serious conversation there. People are looking at a whole spectrum of issues to get at what is basically a structural deficit that preceded this financial crisis.
Even if -- the financial crisis made it much worse, but even if we had not gone through this financial crisis, we'd still have to be dealing with these long-term definite fit brobs. They have to do with Medicaid. They have to do with Medicare. They have to do with Social Security. They had to do with a series of structural problems not unique to America. Some of it has to do with an aging population. And, you know, we've got to look at a tax system that is messy and unfair in a whole range of ways. And so, they're looking at the gamut of steps that are going to be taken.
And one of the interesting things that's happened over the last 18 months as president is, for some reason, people keep on being surprised when I do what I said I was going to do. So I say I'm going to reform our health care system and people think, well, gosh, that's not smart politics, maybe we should hold off. Or I say, we're going to move forward on Don't Ask/Don't Tell. And somehow, people say, well, why are you doing that? I'm not sure that's good politics. I'm doing it because I said I was going to do it. And I think it's the right thing to do.
And people should learn that lesson about me because, next year, when I start presenting some very difficult choices to the country, I hope some of these folks, who are hollering about deficits and debt, step up because I'm calling their bluff. And we'll see how much of that -- how much to the political arguments they're making right now are real and how much of it was just politics. All right?
Thank you very much, everybody.
(APPLAUSE)
DREW GRIFFIN, CNN NEWS ANCHOR: President Obama wrapping up a live news conference from the G20 summit in Toronto, Canada, a wide ranging conference in which the president answered questions on Afghanistan, tensions with North Korea, his Supreme Court nominee, even how the U.S. is getting along with Japan. Buried in all that, an apparent agreement to cuff deficits in half by 2013.
How do you do that? Chief business correspondent, Ali Velshi, standing by from Toronto. Also national security correspondent Jeanne Meserve outside these meetings, watching the protests which are continuing in Toronto.
We'll be right back.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
GRIFFIN: We've just been listening to President Obama, live from Toronto and the G20 summit, wrapping up the summit there, where the economies of the world are at stake.
Discussing that with us is chief business correspondent, Ali Velshi, who is in Toronto.
Ali, I called it a wide-ranging news conference but there was some financial news in there and at the G20 summit in which the advanced economies, including the U.S., would agree to cut our deficits in half by 2013. That's a couple of years away and seems an insurmountable task.
ALI VELSHI, CNN CHIEF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT: Right. I'm a little disappointed that it was as wide ranging, because this was a White House Press Corps that was taking the opportunity to talk to the president about things they talk about every day when, in fact, some very, very important work was done behind me. We need discuss whether this is going to go anywhere.
There was an agreement, as you said, by the industrialized nations, by the successful nations to, by 2013, cut our deficit, the shortfall between what governments spend and what they take in, in half. Then an agreement that, by 2016, the debt, which is the accumulation of all that deficit, will start to come down. Now this is unenforceable, it may not even be attainable. The last question that went to the president was about how you expect to do this. The president said there is a freeze on discretionary spending in the United States. That is such a puny part of the budget, it is almost impossible to achieve those goals.
Now that's not to say everybody doesn't want to, Drew. But this affects more people around the world, in America and elsewhere, than any of those other topics that were discussed. And the reality is, is this real or is this fake? Because if the world decides that they want to cut those deficits and they want to start doing this, this is important. It will mean big differences to us. It could mean tax increases. It could mean cuts to a number of the services we think are important. It could be very meaningful in the upcoming election.
The president just saying that he's going to call the bluff of all those deficit hawks to say, let's actually get this done. That is meaningful that they came to some agreement on this, because they went into this weekend disagreement on whether it is the right time to add more stimulus or take away.
Listen to how the president phrased his concerns about deficit and debt.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
OBAMA: As I reiterated to my colleagues, after years of taking on too much debt, Americans cannot, and will not borrow and buy the world's way to lasting prosperity. No nation should assume its path to prosperity is simply paid with exports to the United States. Indeed, I've made it clear that the United States will compete aggressively for the jobs and industries and markets of the future.
A durable recovery must also include fiscal responsibility. We agree to balance the need for continued growth in the short-term and fiscal sustainability in the medium-term. In the United States I've set a goal of cutting our deficit in half by 2013. (END VIDEO CLIP)
VELSHI: So that part is a victory for the president.
Let me just rewind you to the beginning of his statement where he talks about no country should think their prosperity is dependent on Americans buying their goods. That's a sort of veiled discussion with China, which just this last week, agreed to let its currency float, become more expensive and make their consumers into more powerful consumers, make Chinese goods a little more expensive perhaps to Americans, enhancing American manufacturing. The bottom line is China announced that earlier this week. Nothing really happened with it. There was supposed to be something in the final report, the final communique from the G20 sort of welcoming that announcement from China, but they left that out. They don't want to get ahead of themselves and congratulate China for something China may not actually do.
The president did say he'll keep an eye on this. I'd say China and this debt-deficit reduction are probably the biggest things go come out of this meeting all weekend -- Drew?
GRIFFIN: All right, Ali Velshi live in Toronto. Thanks, Ali.
A lot to chew on and we'll be chewing on it, I'm sure the rest of the week, on your program as well as here on CNN.
There were more protests today. hundreds have now been arrested in Toronto. We'll have Jeanne Meserve on the streets of Toronto when we come back.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
GRIFFIN: And it's been another day of protests in Toronto on the streets one day after demonstrators really created a lot of vandalism and set police cars on fire. Hundreds have now been arrested. For the most part, these people are not interfering with anything to do with the conference.
But let's go to our Jeanne Meserve who is on the streets of Toronto for a wrap-up today.
Jeanne, it seems like today was not as bad as yesterday.
JEANNE MESERVE, CNN NATIONAL SECURITY CORRESPONDENT: We didn't see the sort of violence that we saw yesterday but, boy, we've seen a lot of arrests. You should be able to see our picture here that we're streaming live. If you look beyond this white court services vehicle, you can see some police and some civilians standing at the front of a bus. Those civilians, by and large, are people who have been detain here at this site. They are being loaded on the bus, presumably to be taken to the processing center that this city set up specifically for the G20.
We got to this site in downtown Toronto about an hour ago. And it looked like things were going to get very tense. We're going to span the camera a bit and show you, if we can, the group of demonstrators. They're at the opposite end of the block. We don't believe that there are very many of them up there but they were hemmed in by police. There was some chanting. When we got here, they brought in horses. They were bringing in the riot police. And they warned us downwind that they might be using tear gas and that anybody with children and small dogs should leave the area, and if we were smart, we'd get out, too. But instead of using that gas, what we're doing is detaining people, detaining, we would guess, several dozen people. (INAUDIBLE) across the street behind those white vans.
GRIFFIN: Jeanne?
MESERVE: They have arrested 244, before we got to this batch. That's the technique police are using today to try to keep things under control. And as far as we know, they have -- Drew?
GRIFFIN: Jeanne, just real quickly, the legitimate protesters, the peaceful protesters, were complaining that it was this group of anarchists that seem to follow any global meeting that really caused the problems. Are you seeing those anarchists dressed in black today or have they scurried?
MESERVE: I'll tell you, the police have been looking hard for them. When we drove around this morning, there were bands of police and they would take aside young people, particularly if they were dressed in black and had nap sacks. They'd search through those knapsacks. If they found anything, they were detaining those people. But I spoke to the police just a short time ago and they said they didn't have them all yet.
GRIFFIN: Jeanne, we're going to wrap it up right there. We'll have more on this tonight at 11:00.
Right now, it is time for Michael Jackson's special, "The Final Days."
