Return to Transcripts main page

CNN This Morning

Raphael Satter is Interviewed about X's Grok; Guthrie Ransom Note Unverified; Lawmakers Skeptical about DHS Funding. Aired 6:30-7a ET

Aired February 04, 2026 - 06:30   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[06:31:32]

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): Why are some Republicans speaking so loudly trying to defend masked secret police?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

AUDIE CORNISH, CNN ANCHOR: The government is back open this morning, but the fight in Congress over Immigration and Customs Enforcement reform, well, that's just beginning.

Good morning, everybody. I'm Audie Cornish. I want to thank you for joining me on CNN THIS MORNING.

It is half past the hour. And here's what's happening right now.

President Trump signs a funding bill to reopen the government, but funds for the Department of Homeland Security, well, that's still going to run out in two weeks. Democrats are hoping to negotiate reform for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but Republicans are ruling out two of the top demands, the first being to stop searches without a judicial warrant and ICE officers wearing masks. Many GOP lawmakers also want to add language to end so-called sanctuary cities, which is a nonstarter for Democrats.

And a judge in Oregon temporarily restricts federal officers from using tear gas at protests. The ruling specifically applies to the protests of ICE and the ICE building in Portland. It comes after agents launched gas during a protest, which local officials had described as peaceful.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: For best in show at the 150th Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show is the Doberman Pinscher.

(END VIDEO CLIP) CORNISH: The Westminster Kennel Club crowns a new top dog. Penny, a stunning four-year-old Doberman Pinscher. outperformed nearly 2,500 canines from more than 200 breeds. It is the fifth time a Doberman has taken the top prize at Westminster.

I want to turn to this. Elon Musk finds himself at the center of two high-profile scandals this week, and it's only Wednesday. He started his week with the fallout of being named in the latest Epstein files dump. He allegedly sent emails discussing a possible visit to Epstein's private island, which he denies ever going to the island or any wrongdoing.

Now, in the meantime, Musk is being summoned to appear in a Paris courtroom after a raid of his Paris X offices. It's in connection to Grok, the A.I. platform integrated directly into the app. So, investigators are linking the chat bot to thousands of non-consensual, sexually explicit images, most of women and children, created at the direction of X users. Musk is calling the investigation a political attack.

So, now we've got Reuters cybersecurity correspondent Raphael Satter, who joins the group chat.

Thank you for being with us.

RAPHAEL SATTER, CYBERSECURITY CORRESPONDENT, REUTERS: Thanks for having me.

CORNISH: So, you're in the chat because you've actually used this bot. We were -- Jasmine and I were talking to you about this, which meant --

JASMINE WRIGHT, CO-AUTHOR, NOTUS MORNING NEWSLETTER: Don't implicate me.

CORNISH: Feeding your own image in, right, feeding your own image in and asking it to generate, what, nude images or, like, how are people using it that's causing concern from authorities?

SATTER: So, about a month ago, if you were an X user, you would have seen an explosion of nearly naked images of women, also some men, and occasionally the (INAUDIBLE). And what we wanted to do at Reuters is that we wanted to see exactly how this worked under the hood and what you could ask Grok to do.

Now, we did not ask for extremely graphic sex acts, but we asked for things that were still disturbing. We used our own photos. I used my own photos.

[06:35:00]

We used each other's photos.

CORNISH: What's disturbing? What's a, vanilla, disturbing request?

SATTER: So, the first thing that we asked is we said, like, can you put this user in a bikini? And we made clear to Grok, we said that this user does not consent.

CORNISH: So, an example of that -- I was reading one of the articles, was like, hey, this is a photo of my sister's friend. She doesn't want me to have it. Put this image of her looking like whatever the request is.

SATTER: A hundred percent. And we've also said, hey, this is a photograph of a colleague. I want to strip them down to their underwear because I'm going to distribute this around at work as a prank.

CORNISH: So, you're literally telling the A.I. exactly what you plan on doing with it.

SATTER: Yes. And we were very clear with the A.I. that the person did not consent, number one. And then oftentimes we would also tell Grok that -- that we would be using these images for harmful purposes. We would tell Grok that these images would be used to harm and humiliate. And what we found is that overwhelmingly Grok complied with these requests. And that's particularly disturbing, not just because of what Grok did, but when we compare this to other chat bots, they overwhelming --

CORNISH: Your OpenAIs, your Metas. What, you asked those chat bots and they say, what?

SATTER: ChatGPT, Llama (ph), we asked the exact same prompts, or very, very similar prompts, and they were universally declined.

CORNISH: So, the A.I. will say, I cannot do this, it's against the law?

SATTER: Or they'll say, that's inappropriate or that's harmful. We don't want to use -- we don't want to create harmful content.

CORNISH: So --

SATTER: For Grok, that was less of a problem.

CORNISH: This has been talked about for months and months before this Paris raid. To give you an example of how Elon Musk -- sort of how seriously he was taking it when it first came out and people were putting things in bikinis, a user immediately generated something like this, and Musk responded down below, "perfect."

The reason why I'm showing this is because subsequently he has talked about changes to the app. He said, "I'm not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero." He says it doesn't spontaneously generate them. And he claims that when asked to generate images, it will refuse to produce anything illegal.

So, there's this two-step where he's like, look, we made the changes, stop talking about this. And then also him responding to all these people who are complaining about content moderation by saying, these governments just want to censor us. SATTER: This is why we ran these tests. We wanted to see whether these

changes were effective and what exactly they were. And while we did not test for explicit nudity, we tested for degrading, humiliating and sexualized images. And that Grok is still producing.

CORNISH: OK, I want to bring in the group chat because, Charlie, you know, the House Judiciary GOP put out a tweet, this was just February 3rd, it says, where they talk about the European censorship laws that threaten sort of U.S. free speech online. So, this doesn't say anything about Trump in particular, but there's very much this thought that, like, Europe is out of control with its censorship and the U.S. needs to stand up, I guess for big tech, or tell big tech to have more freedom of speech. Will that be politically unwise when you start talking about child pornography?

CHARLIE DENT (R), FORMER PENNSYLVANIA CONGRESSMAN: Yes, I think there is actually some expectation of content moderation. Just as we're talking about here. And I think it's pretty rich to single out the Europeans for censorship when we deal with all sorts of countries in this world where they censor all the time. We can talk about China. We can go to all sorts of autocratic regimes. And we never say a word about them. But we're picking on our friends in Europe over this.

But I think the Europeans are on to something. They expect to maintain some level of standards that should be abided by in a community or in a country. And I think, you know, we ought to be very careful as a country if we're going to condemn the Europeans for things that I think we might expect our own folks to regulate at some point.

CORNISH: Yes.

ANTJUAN SEAWRIGHT, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: I think what we're finding out, this idea of freedom of speech for Republicans, has turned into convenient speech. They only want freedom of speech when it's convenient for them.

But on a further note, we've seen these A.I.-generated images not become harmful just from a potential pornography standpoint, but also from a political standpoint. And that's why we're going to have to have some sort of regulation in place, in a bipartisan way going forward, otherwise that's going to -- it's going to shape how we maneuver in this country in various ways that could be very harmful just to the American experiment on the whole. And I think this is just one example of why there needs to be some sort of regulation in a bipartisan way, as much as we can.

CORNISH: I want to play something for you guys. This is Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk's many children. She was on Erin Burnett. And she was talking about the concern about A.I. misuse and deepfakes and how that can kind of feel abstract, but how it is different, especially for women and for children.

[06:40:04]

Here's what she had to say.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ASHLEY ST. CLAIR, MOTHER OF ELON MUSK'S SON: Maybe there weren't actual nude images. It was pretty close to it. And the images that I saw, not only of myself, but of I don't even know whose children who were undressed and covered in various fluids, the abuse was so widespread and so horrific, and it's still allowed to happen. They just released restrictions that are based on where it's illegal.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CORNISH: I think it's interesting to hear someone come out related to him, right? To say, like, I, as a woman, I, as a parent.

Can you talk about the influence of that discussion of parents and of people even close to him?

SATTER: I will -- can speak to my own experience. Seeing photographs of yourself stripped nearly naked, covered in oil, on all fours, it's very weird. And that's speaking as a man. For some of my female colleagues, it was even weirder to see these kinds of images. And that's just kind of within the safety of a Reuters staffer generating this image with a chat bot. I'm not even talking about when it's shared or when it's used to shame or humiliate. These are very gross images.

CORNISH: In the meantime, we've got 35 attorneys general calling for X to take action to address this. You've got other countries that have banned Grok completely, U.K., Canada, Ireland, Australia and Brazil.

Jasmine, I know neither you nor I want to talk about this because we don't want to end up in one of these videos, which by just being a woman speaking publicly is a possibility.

WRIGHT: Yes, please don't.

CORNISH: The White House has always talked about protecting the children and the Take It Down Act. What do they do in this case?

WRIGHT: I mean, the White House is prolific in its use of A.I. This is a very separate issue. But just last week they were taking a lot of heat because they altered the photo of an activist that was arrested after entering a church.

CORNISH: Yes, darkening her skin, having tears on her face.

WRIGHT: Yes, darkening her skin, having the tears, when the -- when the -- when the original image was very different. And so, the White House is consistently using A.I. And the fact is, is that A.I. is a big pillar of the president's agenda because he believes that it's going to bring massive investment, massive resources into the U.S., and that the U.S. needs to be at the forefront of this creation of A.I. instead of China or other countries.

And so, they're going to have to have a conversation about what is good A.I. and what is bad A.I. And very clearly, children who have fluids on them and are being shared in that manner is very bad A.I. And so they're going to have to have that conversation. It's just unclear right now if that's happening.

CORNISH: OK, Raphael, thank you so much for your work. Really appreciate you being here.

SATTER: Thanks for having me.

CORNISH: In the meantime, if you missed any of that conversation, I know lots of parents are talking about this, know that we're a podcast that you can share. Scan the QR code now to find it. And CNN THIS MORNING is available anywhere you can get your podcast.

Now coming up on our show, no suspect, no motive. The frantic search for Savannah Guthrie's mom enters a fourth day.

Plus.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LUKE GANGER, RENEE GOOD'S BROTHER: The deep distress our family feels because of Nee's loss is -- in such a violent and unnecessary way.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CORNISH: The brothers of Renee Good, the woman killed by an immigration officer in Minneapolis, they're calling for action.

And the new whistleblower complaint against the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[06:47:52]

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Every lead and tip is important. We are aggressively pursuing and looking into every single one. Again, please help us bring Nancy Guthrie home.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CORNISH: So, the desperate search for Nancy Guthrie, "Today" show anchor Savannah Guthrie's mother, well, it continues this morning. Investigators are searching by air, by foot and say they are following all leads to help bring the 84-year-old home. Now, the FBI has been brought in to help.

Now, she was last seen Saturday night in Tucson, Arizona. Authorities believe that she was taken in the middle of the night against her will. And now there's new reports that ransom notes have been received.

Joining me now with more on the latest developments from Tucson, Marybel Gonzalez.

Marybel, first, I just want to say, when we say received, they were received by news organizations, like TMZ and a local station.

MARYBEL GONZALEZ, CNN REPORTER: Right, Audie. And these have not been verified. TMZ and a local TV station both separately reported to have received what appears to be ransom notes. They also said they have forwarded those to authorities. Now, the Pima County sheriff said they are looking into this. They are taking every lead seriously. But they also say that they have confirmed to CBS that they have shared those notes with the Guthrie family. Again, the Pima County sheriff is not going into details about their investigative leads, only saying that they are taking them very seriously and that they are following and they're trying to vet every sort of tip that they can get to find Nancy Guthrie.

Here is more of what he had to say on the subject.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Is there anything in that note that seems credible at this moment that you're giving weight to?

SHERIFF CHRIS NANOS, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA: The entire note. That's what I would tell you.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The entire note.

NANOS: When the note comes to us, we -- it's like any piece of evidence. You give it to us. You give us a lead. We're going to look at every aspect of that lead and work it as a lead.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So, you're not dismissing this note at this point?

NANOS: Absolutely not.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

[06:50:01]

GONZALEZ: Now, we pressed the sheriff on details of whether there was forced entry in the home, whether or not there was blood that was found inside the home, or at the scene, about specific time frames, about suspects, whether we're talking about one or multiple suspects. Again, the sheriff declined to share specific details about those questions.

He did say that they have recovered evidence from the scene to show that Nancy was taken against her will. This is not a case, he says, of someone who walked away willingly.

Meanwhile, they're continuing to ask the public for their help with any photos, videos or tips that can help bring Nancy home.

Audie.

CORNISH: OK, that's Marybel Gonzalez. Thank you so much for that update. Now, I want to talk about this. The people who say they were mentally

scarred, shot at, dragged, people affected by the Trump administration's immigration tactics testify on Capitol Hill.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MARIMAR MARTINEZ, SHOT BY BORDER PATROL AGENTS IN CHICAGO: The mental scars will always be there as a reminder of the time my own government attempted to execute me. And when they failed (ph), they chose to vilify me.

ALLYA RAHMAN, PULLED CROM CAR BY ICE IN MINNEAPOLIS: I was carried face down through the street by my cuffed arms and legs while yelling that I had a brain injury and was disabled. I now cannot lift my arms normally.

LUKE GANGER, RENEE GOOD'S BROTHER: In the last few weeks, our family took some consolation thinking that perhaps Nee's death would bring about change in our country, and it has not.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CORNISH: Group chat is back.

I wanted to talk about this because when I think about, for instance, the families whose -- who were -- who had relatives who were victims of, let's say, undocumented migrants, their movement became connected to the Trump administration and helped sort of drive things, right, for Trump. Is there a counter movement brewing of families, wronged citizens, beyond the protests that are -- got up in front of the public to say, this is what is happening to us? And is the White House hearing anything outside of their bubbles?

WRIGHT: Yes, I mean, to the movement question, perhaps. I mean just -- I think it's notable to say that that hearing was put together by Democrats alone.

CORNISH: Yes. We should say it was a forum.

WRIGHT: Right, it was a forum.

CORNISH: It was not a hearing. And no Republicans went to it.

WRIGHT: And so I think that that's notable in itself, the way that the Democrats are moving forward.

I think when you ask the White House, they say, yes, these are important stories, but so are the stories of folks like Laken Riley, who were the victims of undocumented immigrants.

But the fact is, is that the poll numbers show that a majority of Americans no longer believe that ICE is doing the job that they need to. They believe that they are overreacting in these situations, even if largely people still believe in this, you know, kind of broader deportation agenda. CORNISH: Yes. Let me play an example for you. Andrew Schulz on his

podcast. He's the kind of in the manosphere vibe independent-ish guy that people were paying attention to. And here is how he's talking about his -- how the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti have sort of changed his thinking.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ANDREW SCHULZ, HOST, "FLAGRANT" PODCAST: ICE murdered an American citizen in cold blood, and then the Trump administration called him a domestic terrorist.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes.

SCHULZ: That's it.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes.

SCHULZ: Like plain and simple.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes.

SCHULZ: I see the administration trying to spin it. And it's (EXPLETIVE DELETED) disgusting.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

DENT: There needs to be new leadership at DHS. You know, I --

CORNISH: Can you say that louder?

DENT: Yes.

CORNISH: You're saying there needs to be new leadership at DHS.

DENT: Yes. I mean the --

CORNISH: That's enough?

DENT: I came to Congress in 2004, shortly after the department was stood up. I was on the Homeland Security Committee. I used to deal with serious people who led that department. Tom Ridge, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano, Jeh Johnson, John Kelly during Trump one. All these people, they -- you know, they believed in Homeland Security. They believed in civil rights and protecting people's rights. And I just feel like, right now, DHS is -- is in need of terrible reform.

CORNISH: But do you think Democrats are at the point where they have the leverage to make fundamental requests and changes. I only ask, and I'll come to you, Antjuan. Senator Blumenthal, who helped put together this thing, saying that, like, look, this is why I hear the anger, I hear the outrage, and this is why they're demanding things like body cameras on, masks off, accountability, judicial warrants. And then he says, "if these demands are not met, I will not vote for another penny for funding DHS."

So, this conversation is going to come up in like two weeks.

SEAWRIGHT: Well, I will tell you this, 73 percent of those who've been taken into custody by ICE since October have no criminal history. Only five -- according to the Cato Institute, only five percent have a violent criminal history. If the purpose of ICE is to arrest the bad actors, and we agree we need those people out of the country, they failed on their mission. It should not take, Charlie Dent, 12 people being shot since September, two execution style in the public eye, because of a camera, for leaders to step up to the plate and say, we should do something.

[06:55:02]

Mike Johnson, speaker of the House, said yesterday, he did not know if ICE tactics were too aggressive. We're talking about two people killed on camera and God knows what else, including a five year old arrested.

CORNISH: Well, the argument is -- remains this, if Democratic cities and states cooperated, none of this would have happened. If the Biden administration didn't do x. Like they are very much sticking with this line of thinking to counter.

WRIGHT: Yes. Yes.

CORNISH: They're not saying, uh-oh, these deaths mean we need to change.

WRIGHT: And I think the reality of it is that, you know, the Democrats have asked for kind of a narrow list of reforms when it comes to ICE, right? They're not asking to abolish ICE.

CORNISH: No, they're not.

WRIGHT: They're not asking to cut their funding. They're saying, we want to end roving. We want these judicial warrants -- I mean we want only judicial warrants. We want them to be unmasked. We want them to have body cameras. And I've talked to a couple of Republicans really on the right, and they're basically only acquiescing right now to these body cameras, which the DHS already said it's going to do.

CORNISH: Out of the whole list, body cameras is the only thing.

WRIGHT: Out of the whole list it's said, violence (ph), we're OK with that.

And so -- I mean, body cameras, we're OK with that. So, I think it is going to be a bit of a difficult negotiation for Democrats to get all of those things on their list, even though they're very targeted, because I think Republicans fundamentally believe that having masks on is a way to protect ICE. Whether or not you personally agree, that is what they believe. And they believe that these administrative warrants allow them to go into homes and find people who should be deported.

CORNISH: Yes. These are the warrants they basically write for themselves rather than going to a judge.

WRIGHT: Yes, who don't need to go to judges.

SEAWRIGHT: Going to a judge.

CORNISH: Let me stay with --

WRIGHT: And the way that speeds (ph) along this agenda, which again, they want to deport a lot of people.

CORNISH: Yes, so just to stick with this, there was a moment I need to mention from this week. So, there was this Justice Department attorney who was in court, and he told the judge that working with ICE was so dysfunctional that, quote, "the system sucks. This job sucks."

And when asked why DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, had been basically blowing off judicial orders, that that was his response. He said, "I wish you would hold me in contempt so I would have a full 24 hours of sleep," the attorney added.

DENT: These are -- look --

CORNISH: When you've lost your own attorney, OK, it's Andrew Schulz and then a guy who's just like --

WRIGHT: In public to the judge.

CORNISH: Yes, exactly. For the record, which is a dangerous thing to do for this administration.

WRIGHT: Yes, for the record said, please, kick me out of here.

DENT: The problems of this department are ones of leadership and professionalism. Now, some of the reforms being bandied about make sense. Some are going to be difficult. And there's no way they're going to come to an agreement on these DHS reforms by February 13th is what the law wants them to do. So, I mean, but really, it's leadership and professionalism that need to be restored at the department.

CORNISH: OK.

BENT: But some of these reforms may make sense. Some may not.

CORNISH: You guys, we're going to talk about your group chats now. We talked about a lot of things.

I know what will be in my group chat is Raphael's reporting on Grok and putting -- reporters kind of putting in their own images and trying to figure out what's going on, in part because Elon Musk and Grok, he's merged a bunch of his companies, SpaceX and things like that. And so, it is the foundation of this, like, massive A.I. fueled company he's trying to make. What are you thinking about?

WRIGHT: My group chat is "Industry" on HBO.

CORNISH: Yes. Related. WRIGHT: Right now the best show on TV.

CORNISH: Related. It's literally about child verification laws.

WRIGHT: Oh, my God, high-five.

CORNISH: Yes. OK.

WRIGHT: Like, it's so good. There it is. It's so good.

CORNISH: It is about European content moderation.

WRIGHT: Shout-out to Myha'la. Shout-out to Marisa. They are the two best characters on there.

CORNISH: Yes.

WRIGHT: I'm obsessed. And if you haven't watched it, just, you know, and you don't know finance, like I don't, just power through it. It's OK. You'll get to a point where the finance terms just go in one ear and out the other, and you can just -- now they are freaks, so they need chastity belts, but it's a great show. They are pretty tough (ph).

CORNISH: OK. It is also this season about Europe's attempts to deal with sexualized content in the internet space.

WRIGHT: Yes. OK, that's a better way to put it, yes.

CORNISH: Yes, exactly. OK. But shout out, OK, to our now -- our current parent company.

Charlie.

DENT: Yes. My former congressional staff and I bandy about from time to time. And we've been talking about, only Congress can, you know, pass a funding bill then set up a cliff for less than ten days later.

CORNISH: I know. Another one.

DENT: And so is the DHS. So, here we are to another cliff. And, of course, they're not going to, as I said a moment ago we were -- there's no way they're going to reform ICE and CBP in the -- in ten days.

CORNISH: OK.

SEAWRIGHT: My group chat is really about this effort to whitewash history. It's Black History Month. We know --

CORNISH: It's still Black History Month.

WRIGHT: Shout-out. Shout-out.

SEAWRIGHT: And it's still Black History Month. Black history is American history. There would be no American history without black history. But yet we do not see the conversations elevated around the important contributions that black Americans have made to this 250 year old experiment.

CORNISH: Yes. In fact we've seen, not just whitewashing, but diminishment and taking down voices and things like that.

SEAWRIGHT: And it's actually working in terms of silencing the rich history that we have brought to this country.

CORNISH: Yes. I think -- I'm really glad you brought this up because it is a strange year to be having a conversation about Black History Month --

WRIGHT: Yes.

CORNISH: Which so much of that history is a history of protest and resistance and at odds with the nation that is not always wanting to lift it up.

[07:00:01]

And I think we are still wrestling with some of the same themes that people have wrestled with in the black community.

WRIGHT: But I think, even in the face of that, you're seeing people just be so much more proud to be black in this moment and proud to engage in this month that celebrates us, even if, you know, the powers that be aren't.

CORNISH: Yes. OK. Last word.

Thank you so much, Jasmine. Thank you, guys, for being with me. We appreciate that you chose to spend the morning with us. I'm Audie Cornish, and the news headlines are next.