Return to Transcripts main page

Isa Soares Tonight

FBI Releases Images of "Armed Individual" at Guthrie's Home; U.S. Lawmakers Suggest Redactions Protecting Powerful People; Bill Calls for End of Statute of Limitations on Sex Trafficking; Netanyahu to Talk Potential Iran Strike with Trump; Court Hands Narges Mohammadi Seven More Years in Prison; Trump Threatens to Block Opening of New U.S.-Canada Bridge; Masked Subject Obstructing Camera at Guthrie's Home. Aired 2-3p ET

Aired February 10, 2026 - 14:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

[14:15:00]

ISA SOARES, HOST, ISA SOARES TONIGHT: Hello, and a very warm welcome, I'm Isa Soares. Let me get you up to speed on our breaking news out of the

United States if you've just been joining us. The FBI has released images of a masked armed person apparently tampering with the security camera at

Nancy Guthrie's home.

The subject is seen on Guthrie's doorstep near Tucson, Arizona, you can see it there. They're wearing gloves and carrying, as well as a backpack. The

mother of "NBC News" anchor Savannah Guthrie has been missing now for ten days, an apparent ransom messages have been sent to several media outlets.

Savannah Guthrie has released a new message today as these images came out, saying the family believes that Nancy is still alive. We've also heard in

the last half an hour or so from the White House Press Secretary, I'm just going to quote what we heard from the Press Secretary.

"The President encourages any American across the country with any knowledge of the suspect to please call the FBI who continue to assist

state and local authorities. The prayers of the entire White House are with the Guthrie family."

We are going to continue keeping a close eye on this story, and of course, we'll bring you any developments as they happen. But for now, drip by drip.

We are learning some new details about what's behind all those black bars really obscuring critical information in the Epstein files.

The U.S. Justice Department is now allowing lawmakers to review the unredacted version of documents it's already released. But one lawmaker

says only four computers were provided for members of Congress to scrutinize millions of pages. Several lawmakers say the Justice Department

is unnecessarily blocking many names from public view, really defying its legal obligations.

They're accusing the DOJ of dramatic -- of dramatic over redactions to protect powerful people. Have a listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. JARED MOSKOWITZ (D-FL): There are clearly co-conspirators in here that they can name. OK, I mean, in the documents I saw, we got pictures and

their names, they're talking about sourcing girls, there's people in Paris, there's people in Russia, there's people in Czech.

[14:20:00]

REP. THOMAS MASSIE (R-KY): In a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are

presented. At least, one is a U.S. citizen, at least, one is a foreigner, and the other three or four have names, so I'm not sure if they're foreign

or U.S.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And which field do they work in? Is it finance, banking, political?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: One is pretty high up in a foreign government.

REP. JAMIE RASKIN (D-MD): I think that the Department of Justice has been in a cover-up mode for many months, and has been trying to sweep the entire

thing under the rug.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

SOARES: Well, the Justice Department, meanwhile, says it's hiding nothing. It has not explained why FBI Director Kash Patel last year, said there was

no credible information showing that Epstein trafficked girls to other people for sexual abuse. Let's get more on all of this and really, what is

at the heart of this story and has been from day one, survivors who have been fighting for justice, as well as accountability for years.

Today, Democrats on Capitol Hill joined Epstein survivors and their families, introducing legislation to remove the Statute of Limitations on

sex trafficking. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer says it would allow survivors to come forward when they are ready, knowing abusers can't escape

justice by running out the clock.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): For years, survivors of Epstein's abuse were ignored. They were doubted. They were silenced. They were dismissed, and

even when the truth finally came out, even when the world finally listened, too many survivors were still told by the law, it's too late, your justice

has expired.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

SOARES: Let's get more on all these threads, I'm joined now by Annie Grayer and our Stephen Collinson. Annie, let me start with you because we

heard and we played some clips there from Representative Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna who have viewed these Epstein documents in full.

They said as we heard there, six powerful and wealthy men's identities are being protected by redactions. We've also seen Commerce Secretary Howard

Lutnick face intense criticism today over his alleged ties with Epstein. Meanwhile, I understand that tomorrow, we're hearing from Attorney General

Pam Bondi. Just lay it out for us and whether the pressure is increasing.

ANNIE GRAYER, CNN SENIOR REPORTER: There are a lot of threads, you're right, that we are following on Capitol Hill. But first, on these Epstein

documents. So, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna, who were the two lawmakers who co-led the legislation that compelled the

Department of Justice to release these files in the first place, went to DOJ yesterday to finally get to see the unredacted versions of these

documents.

And what they found was that the DOJ had redacted the names of at least, six men who appeared on a list of potential co-conspirators to Epstein's

sex trafficking crimes, and that is not who the DOJ should have been putting redactions on. The law required redactions to protect victims'

personal information, and potentially any ongoing active criminal investigations.

And the lawmakers say these redactions don't align with what the law had laid out. And since they talked to the press and made their public case for

these six names to be unredacted, DOJ actually has gone and unredacted them. And in fact, Congressman Khanna even wrote -- read those names onto

the House floor.

Now, none of these are household names, but it just shows that there's a lot of questions for DOJ still to answer about their redaction process. In

fact, Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin said when he went to review the files, he found multiple examples where President Trump's name was

redacted, and he has a lot of questions about that.

Now, just beyond what was redacted, what wasn't redacted, the lawmakers who went in yesterday told me that even in this unredacted setting where

lawmakers should have access to complete unredacted documents, there were still documents that were redacted which they -- which they think means

that the FBI and other agencies who gave their original documents to DOJ, handed them over already with redactions, which should not be the case.

DOJ should have access to all of the unredacted materials. So, now the question is, from -- to the FBI and DOJ, why are there redactions on some

of these original documents? So, there is a lot of pressure both from Democrats and Republicans, to get to the answers -- to get to the answers

here.

There's a bipartisan push on all of this, and as you mentioned, Attorney General Pam Bondi is going to be in front of the House Judiciary Committee

tomorrow, where a lot of the members who have gone in to view these unredacted Epstein files are going to be able to ask her questions for the

first time in public for all to see.

There really is momentum on Capitol Hill to continue to shed a light on this, and in fact, even bipartisan outrage for -- against individuals like

Secretary Lutnick, like you mentioned, whose relationship with Epstein has gone further than previously known.

[14:25:00]

And so, this investigation is continuing to unravel. There's new leads being picked up sort of every day here, and lawmakers are not dropping the

ball on this one.

SOARES: Stay with us, Annie, let me go to Stephen. On that push for accountability, we were talking, of course, how Lutnick -- I just want to

read out a tweet, Stephen, from Ian Bremmer, who of course, is very well known. "He said lying about his relationship with Epstein was a fireable

offense for Peter Mandelson here in the U.K.

It is not for Howard Lutnick, different systems, different values, different leaders, different priorities. Speak to that difference that we

are seeing.

STEPHEN COLLINSON, CNN POLITICS SENIOR REPORTER: Yes, so, we start from the premise in the United States that the organ of investigation is the

Justice Department. And under the Trump administration, the Justice Department has become a political wing of Donald Trump's operation.

The President has said that it's time to move on for the country. He doesn't want any more coming out about this. And that is the reason, I

think, why, notwithstanding growing pressure in Congress and from survivors of Epstein's abuse, there is not the same obligation, it seems, on public

figures as there is, for instance, in the United Kingdom or Norway, to take action about their past links with Jeffrey Epstein.

There's not that momentum, I think, of governments trying to get to the bottom of some of the things that went on. So, that's the start of this,

and of course, as Annie was saying, there is this bipartisan push in Congress, the question, I think becomes whether a Congress that after a

Republican revolt voted to compel the Justice Department to release all these documents, are they now going to be willing to go back and hold the

administration's feet to the fire, especially before many Republican lawmakers face a tough primary fights ahead of the Midterm elections.

Is the Republican Party seriously willing to start putting Trump administration officials like Howard Lutnick on the spot permanently in a

way that could make a big difference.

SOARES: Stephen and Annie, I know you'll stay across both those angles, thank you very much indeed. We're going to -- still to come right here on

the show, Iranian women's rights activist Narges Mohammadi faces seven more years in jail. I asked her brother how she's coping amid battles with her

health. Our conversation just ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[14:30:24]

SOARES: Welcome back everyone. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is headed to Washington to meet with President Trump. At the top of his

agenda is discussing a potential strike on Iran in case negotiations between Washington and Tehran fail. This according to two Israeli sources.

One says Israel is worried Iran is restoring its ballistic missile stockpiles to levels preceding last year's 12-day war. CNN has been unable

to verify that.

And this comes as one of Iran's top security officials is in Oman amid efforts to set up another round of indirect meetings with Washington. This

diplomatic sprint comes after a round of US-Iran talks that happened on Friday, addressing Iran's demand to enrich uranium, something the U.S. and

its allies staunchly oppose.

Let's get more on all these developments. Our Nic Robertson joins me now live from Jerusalem. And, Nic, I'm just seeing that the White House press

secretary, Karoline Leavitt, just briefing the press in the last few moments, saying that -- confirming that Donald Trump, President Trump, is

planning indeed to meet with Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This would be his seventh trip, I understand, to the White House since

Trump took office. I suppose it speaks to the urgency for Netanyahu. What is he likely to get out of this?

NIC ROBERTSON, CNN INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC EDITOR: Yes, it's the seventh time the pair will be meeting. And before leaving, the prime minister of

Israel said that -- well, he pointed to that close relationship, the fact that he's seen and met with President Trump on so many occasions. This just

during the president's second term. And he points to that, saying this indicates the strength of the relationship that I have with President

Trump. This indicates the strength of the relationship between Israel and the United States.

And the implication of that is that when he goes into his meeting with President Trump, he is going to get listened to and hopefully more than

that, the president will act on what he's saying. And what he said is going to go into that meeting talking about, first and foremost, he said, is the

Iran talks. He wants to be able to give his view on what negotiations and talks should be like. And he is very concerned, he said, about Iran's

ballistic missile programmed, about Iran's funding and supporting of proxies in the region here.

President Trump has said that he, and he said this on Friday, that he is happy talking to Iran at the moment in the talks only about the nuclear

issue and not about the missiles and not about the supporting of proxies in the region.

As you said, Ali Larijani, very senior Iranian official, the head of the Supreme National Security Council in Iran, had meetings in Oman with the

sultan. That's quite exceptional. It sort of hints that the talks that were held on Friday, although both sides came out and said they were positive,

it hints that there were some difficulties below the surface there. And we have heard from Larijani speaking after that meeting in Oman, saying that

one of the things he thinks should happen in the next step -- next phase should be a strategic threat reduction.

And that -- by that, I think he is implying that the United States needs to back off with its aircraft carrier and other armaments in the region. He

does say that he supports and thinks that the United States wanting to talk only about the nuclear a nuclear deal is the right way to go, an

improvement over previous administrations, he said, and if that is successful, then there is the possibility of moving on to other issues. He

doesn't say missiles, he doesn't say proxies, but he does say that there is that possibility.

I think the caveat here has to be, when looking at Iranian negotiations over the years, this phased approach is favored by them, and it doesn't

mean everyone is going to get to the next step. When it comes to instability in the region, Larijani pointed a finger very clearly at

Israel.

But it is Prime Minister Netanyahu who is actually going to be in the room at the White House with President Trump on Wednesday, and that deep and

strong connection that they have will count for something, the Israeli leader hopes. At the moment, though, it really does seem as if the

possibility of talks continue, the threat of force, if not, is still very real.

SOARES: Yes. Nic Robertson for us in Jerusalem. Good to see you, Nic. Thank you very much indeed. Well, the Iranian Nobel laureate Narges

Mohammadi has been sentenced to seven more years in prison, that is according to her lawyer. The women's and human rights activist has spent

most of the past two decades in the notorious Evin Prison. She is currently detained in Mashhad.

And this latest sentence comes as Tehran cracks down on all dissent following nationwide protests and the deaths of thousands at the hands of

pro-regime security forces.

[14:35:00]

I spoke with her Narges' brother, Hamidreza Mohammadi, about how she is coping.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HAMIDREZA MOHAMMADI, NARGES MOHAMMADI'S BROTHER: I know how she thinks about these trials. She has always said that these trials are sham trials.

They are based on nothing and the items that they have listed in her conviction, it's almost -- it means nothing. Spreading propaganda against

the regime and assembly inclusion against the regime, these have been always used against political prisoners. When they don't find anything

concrete, they use these terms. So, she didn't even defend herself because she said it's not a real trial. Why should I defend myself?

SOARES: I wonder whether you know how her health is right now, whether she has access to any kind of specialized healthcare, even lawyers, Hamidreza.

I mean, is she -- does she have access to lawyers?

MOHAMMADI: It's something that's very common in Iran. When political prisoners go to prison, they have no access to their own lawyers. Rarely

can they call their lawyers when it's too late and there's nothing to do, there's nothing the lawyer can do. The lawyers cannot defend their client

and their lawyers are just there to be told that she's got the prison, for example.

When she got arrested, she was beaten and alongside with other prisoners who were kept with her, we know that they were brutally harassed and

beaten. Those who were released, those who were with Narges and they got released, they have reported that she has heart problems and she's in a

critical condition. It has been so critical that the authorities themselves have taken her to the hospital but they have not allowed her to stay in the

hospital.

And Narges also doesn't want to be in a hospital that's not trusted because they have a history of injecting political prisoners with unknown drugs and

then saying that they got bad and they had heart attacks. So, we don't trust their doctors and their hospitals. She had a condition that if my

family is present at the hospital, she would go to the hospital.

SOARES: Yes. And that must be incredibly nerve-wracking for you, Hamidreza, you know, listening to your sister's health and knowing that she

can't get the right treatment that she clearly deserves. Can I just turn to the background in which this conviction is happening against your sister

because it comes, as we've reported on the show, as Tehran tries to negotiate with the U.S. over its nuclear programmed to try and avert some

sort of military strike that we've heard repeatedly from President Trump. Have you or any member of your family heard from the Trump administration?

MOHAMMADI: No, we haven't heard anything from the administration. And I must say that after the massacre in Iran, any negotiation with this regime

is just turning your back on the Iranian people and normalizing a regime that has no respect for human life.

SOARES: Should President Trump, you think, be doing more for your sister and the countless others, quite frankly, who have been unjustly imprisoned?

What would you say to the U.S. president?

MOHAMMADI: I would say that if they can do it to a very well-known person like Narges, who has got the prize and is known all over the world, just

imagine what they're doing to people who have no connection to anywhere, any organization. Sometimes the human rights organizations don't even have

their names, those who have been arrested or killed.

So, if they're doing it to Narges, I'm sure they're doing 1,000 times worse to people who are defenseless and they have no one to report anything or

they don't have the access to the internet to report anything.

SOARES: Do you think that your sister -- I mean, she's got seven years, in total it will be 15 years, do you think they're using her to make an

example out of her, the regime?

[14:40:00]

MOHAMMADI: The situation is in Iran is that maybe before it was making an example for Iranians.

SOARES: Yes.

MOHAMMADI: But I think it's a message to Iranians that we are very tough, we don't care about international law. While they are surrendering to

negotiations outside, inside Iran they say we don't negotiate, we don't care about what they say about Iran. Inside they are acting tough and

outside they are looking for a way to save themselves. So, it's not even about examples now because they made an example by killing tens of

thousands of people.

SOARES: Yes. Hamidreza, look, we're all thinking and praying for your sister of course, I can only imagine how incredibly difficult it must be

for you and your family of course to hear absolute silence knowing how poorly she is health-wise. Thank you very much, Hamidreza, for taking time

to speak to us. Thank you.

MOHAMMADI: Thank you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

SOARES: That was Narges' Mohammadi's brother, Hamidreza Mohammadi, speaking to me earlier. And still to come tonight, the one strong bond

between the U.S. and Canada is being tested once again. President Trump's newest threat targeting America's northern neighbors will bring you that

story.

Plus, an update on our breaking news story as the FBI releases images of a masked armed person. Apparently, as you can see there, tampering with a

security camera at Nancy Guthrie's home. Both those stories after this short break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

SOARES: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says a row with U.S. President Donald Trump over the opening of a new bridge connecting the two countries

will be resolved. Mr. Carney says he spoke to the president today about his threat to block that opening and explained to him that Canada paid for the

new Gordie Howe International Bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario. In a social media post, Mr. Trump wrongly stated that the bridge

was built with virtually no American input. He added, I will not allow this bridge to open until the United States is fully compensated for everything

we have given them. And also, importantly, Canada treats the United States with the fairness and respect we deserve.

Let's go to the White House now where Kevin Liptak is following the story. And, Kevin, from what I understand, this bridge is kind of ready to open

later this year. The president hasn't said how exactly he would block the opening of this bridge. Talk us through what the very latest here.

[14:45:00]

KEVIN LIPTAK, CNN SENIOR WHITE HOUSE REPORTER: Yes, he has not explained how that would happen. And you're right, the bridge is pretty much

finished. It's set to open, you know, sometime in the next couple of months. All they have to do is basically inspect it, connect it to the

roads. And so, when the president and his press secretary, who is just out at the podium saying that they didn't think it contained enough American

materials, it's not really clear like what the resolution to that is going to be. The bridge is already there and ready to go. But nonetheless, it

seems clear that this is sort of the latest irritant in the president's relationship with Canada.

You know, during his first term he actually praised this bridge. It is one of the busiest trade routes in North America. He said back then that it was

a vital economic link between our two countries, but I think it's evident that this deteriorating relationship between the U.S. and Canada, you know,

the relationship between the president and Prime Minister Carney sort of bottoming out, has led the president to sort of change his view of all of

this.

And you see in his Truth Social post his grievances extend well beyond the Gordie Howe bridge. You know, he's talking about how Canadian liquor stores

aren't stocking American products. He's talking about how Carney is trying to open up this trade relationship with China and with Beijing, and in that

True Social post he even goes on to make this perplexing claim that the first thing China will do is terminate all ice hockey being played in

Canada and permanently eliminate the Stanley Cup. You know, no idea what the president's talking about there.

You know, Canada paid for the entirety of this bridge. It was almost $5 billion. The plan had been for Canada to recoup some of those costs by

collecting the tolls, and then down the line when it had sort of made good on all of that, eventually the toll revenue would be shared between the

U.S. and Canada. Now, President Trump's saying that he wants to open negotiations with Canada to share some of the toll revenues. Carney today

saying that the conversation was constructive. It remains to be seen how exactly this particular issue is going to be resolved.

SOARES: I know you'll stay across it. Kevin, good to see you. Thank you very much indeed. And we are continuing to follow developments in Nancy

Guthrie's disappearance. The FBI has released images of masked person on her doorstep wearing gloves, as you can see there. Authorities believe the

person is armed and carrying a backpack or tools.

The 84-year-old Guthrie has been missing now for 10 days. Her daughter, NBC Savannah Guthrie, posted the images on her Instagram account, and she says,

we believe she's still alive. Bring her home.

Our Josh Campbell joins me now for more. And, Josh, you know, when I looked at these images, we all looked at these images, they're just absolutely

chilling, right? Absolutely chilling for all of us. An individual tampering with Nancy Guthrie's camera. What do you take away when you look at the,

not just the photos, but also the video, what's valuable in them, you think?

JOSH CAMPBELL, CNN SENIOR CORRESPONDENT: Well, you're spot-on in how chilling this is to actually see this suspect there coming up to the

Guthrie family home. You know, before this video was actually located by the FBI and then released publicly, authorities were appealing to the

public for any type of tips about what would have happened, but essentially doing so in the abstract, kind of putting it on the public to say, look, we

want you to think, did you -- do I recall seeing something there around the time of her disappearance, maybe before, but this now is so crucial to

actually give them the image of what appears to be the subject in this case.

There are a few takeaways that we have here. As you look at this imagery, first of all, it appears that the person comes and has a firearm on this

person just there at their front. But you also see that their hands are obscured, their face is obscured, their clothing is from head to toe. You

know, criminals are sometimes smart, you know, in certain circumstances, and this could have been an attempt by this individual to try to prevent

leaving behind any type of identifying information, such as a fingerprint, such as hair fibers or skin that could then be used for DNA testing. And

so, again, that chilling to know that no one would come up to a residence dressed like that with a firearm unless there are sinister motives behind

that.

Now, the reason why we don't actually see on video Ms. Guthrie being taken away is because we know that the camera itself was taken by the suspect,

but authorities were able to resurrect this data to try to get these imageries that were stored from the family security system.

And then the last thing is, although the public is -- or the law enforcement is now pushing the public to provide any tips, law enforcement

is also working behind the scenes to analyze every single item on that individual right now, everything from the article of clothing, the

backpack, the firearm. We've seen in certain cases that if they're able to identify where certain items are purchased, they can actually go and try to

canvass employees and try to determine, did you recognize this person buying it? Was there a form of payment? That's meticulous work, but all

going on behind the scenes right now.

[14:50:00]

SOARES: And we know that the camera was removed. You and I have spoken about this and we were told by the FBI director Kash Patel that these

images that I want to quote here, Josh, "were recovered from residual data located in back-end systems."

So, if you're now the FBI or the sheriff, I'm guessing you might be getting lots of tips, right? Like you were saying, people looking at the clothing,

people looking at mannerisms. Just how do you then pull through all the information coming in? I mean, with this flood of tips coming in?

CAMPBELL: Well, we know -- it's a great question. The FBI has surged additional resources there to Arizona because as they mentioned -- as you

just mentioned, they would know that by putting this out there, that's also going to potential lead to another influx of tips. And look, these tips can

take various forms. Sometimes in these high-profile cases, you might have tips that are actually applicable that end up being helpful. There's also

another category where people who might just have good intentions and want to try to help, but the information that they're actually providing is not

at all relevant to the case.

And then the third category is oftentimes, unfortunately, you have people out there who just want to cause mischief or so disinformation that flood

tips with information that is completely wrong. And so, it's a great question. That is why it's going to require so many resources by the FBI

and local law enforcement to try to go through any of those tips.

But, you know, we've seen in so many cases, it can just be one tip that then turns this case on a dime and sends them in the direction of where the

subject and hopefully Ms. Guthrie is. But they're looking for that important lead right now.

SOARES: Here is hoping. Josh, appreciate it. Josh Campbell there in Los Angeles.

CAMPBELL: You bet.

SOARES: We're going to take a short break. We'll see you on the other side.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

SOARES: Two men have been arrested after a dramatic and frightening armored truck heist on an Italian highway. Have a look at this. Police say

at least six people took part in the operation, using explosives to blow open the back of the truck. The robbers didn't get away with much money

because an automated system locked down the cash in the vehicle. After a high-speed chase, police exchanged gunshots with the gang and at least one

officer was injured. Authorities are still searching for two accomplices, as you can see taking place in Puglia in Italy.

While the quad gods' quest for individual gold begins today, Ilia Malinin is due to take the ice in the next hour or so as this short-programmed

portion of Men's Figure Skating is underway. Malinin will go just before his main rival, Yuma Kagiyama of Japan. The gold medal will be awarded on

Friday after the free skate. We will remember, of course, that backflip from him.

[14:55:00]

Also, at the Olympics today, Ben Ogden became the first American man to medal in the cross-country skiing. In 50 years, he took the silver in the

race, while Norway's Johannes Klaebo won gold. Congratulations.

And finally, after 15 weeks of walking, their journey is now over. A group of Buddhist monks, if you remember, we covered this story right from the

beginning, who began a walk for peace back in October, have arrived at their final destination, Washington, D.C. They trekked from Texas, carrying

the simple message really so needed right now, peace, mindfulness, as well as compassion. The monks and many followers arrived at Washington's

National Cathedral such a short time ago.

Their walk has turned into a social media sensation, drawing attention in every town as well as city they visited. The monks plan to stay in

Washington for two days and ask lawmakers to make Buddha's birthday a national holiday. Maybe some of those politicians can be inspired by them.

That does it for us tonight. Do stay right here, "What We Know" with Max Foster is up next. I'll see you tomorrow.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[15:00:00]

END