Return to Transcripts main page

CNN Live At Daybreak

Conflict in the Middle East: White House Reveals New Intentions

Aired October 02, 2001 - 07:24   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
MILES O'BRIEN, CNN ANCHOR: CNN has learned the White House is considering some significant steps regarding the Middle East. The moves could have an impact on Arab support for a coalition against terrorism. At the top of the list, possible support for the eventual creation of a Palestinian state.

Our Jerusalem bureau chief Mike Hanna joining us with talk about that -- good morning, Mike.

MIKE HANNA, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Good morning, Miles.

Essentially, this story is emanating from the U.S. State Department and sources in the State Department have told CNN that the State Department is reviewing U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Among the moves being considered by State Department, according to the sources, is a recognition of the possibility of a Palestinian state.

Now, this had been recognized by previous Democratic administrations, but this would be the first time that a Republican administration has accepted the concept of an independent Palestinian state coming into being in this region.

Now, here in Jerusalem and in Israel at present is a holiday. There's been no formal response from the Israeli government or the Palestinian Authority. Not likely to be any formal response until this becomes formal U.S. policy. However, what we do know is that in the weeks since September the 11th, there has been a far greater degree of U.S. involvement in this region.

The U.S. secretary of state, Colin Powell, has been in consistent telephone contact with Israeli and Palestinian leaders. The reason for all of this, Miles, is that the U.S. wants this part of the equation, the ongoing conflict in this region is seen by the U.S. as a major stumbling block to its attempts to forge an international coalition against terror and to have within that coalition Arab states.

Now, Arab states generally see the U.S. role in the Middle East as a supportive one, an overly supportive one for Israel. And this perception is a major stumbling block to U.S. efforts to form a broad- based coalition including Arab nations. So what is going on here essentially is the U.S. within recent weeks has been making very clear that it wants the leaders in this region to get back to the negotiating table. It has, we know from sources on both sides, put immense pressure both on Yasser Arafat and on Ariel Sharon to declare a cease-fire. That cease-fire purportedly in place. It was agreed to last Wednesday. Still not taking effect on the ground.

However, the stories that the sources are repeating within the U.S. State Department does indicate that this shifting U.S. policy which we have defined on the ground in terms of U.S. diplomatic action could become far more public and it could register a major shift in U.S. policy in this region -- Miles.

O'BRIEN: Mike, the timing of this, of course, is crucial for the U.S. administration as it tries to build this coalition. I'm curious if there might be a bit of skepticism when talking to Arab leaders in the Arab world about this apparent shift given the events of September 11 and will that undermine the U.S. effort here?

HANNA: Well, once again, there may be a degree of skepticism. However, within the immediate region, Palestinian leaders have been advocating a greater U.S. role in enforcing a cease-fire within the last week. They had been advocating a greater U.S. role in bringing about negotiations. So for the immediate region, as far as Palestinians are concerned, such a step by the U.S. would be very significant and would be deeply welcomed and very likely, too, that the Arab world, the white Arab world, though perhaps skeptical about the timing, as you say, would also welcome such a step, which would, publicly at least, define a greater impartiality in the U.S. position in the region.

Now, the Arab world, as I said, do perceive U.S. bias towards Israel and steps such as this in terms of bringing pressure to bear not only on the Palestinians to end the violence, but also on Israel to take concrete steps to end what the Arab world views as an illegal and aggressive occupation of Palestinian territories, would be seen as imposing a greater degree of impartiality by the U.S. in the region and make any partnership or coalition with the U.S. more acceptable to the Arab world -- Miles.

O'BRIEN: CNN's Mike Hanna is our Jerusalem bureau chief. Thanks very much for that.

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com