Return to Transcripts main page
One World with Zain Asher
Ukraine: Russia Launches Drone Attack, Targets Kyiv; Trump To Sign Hi Megabill Into Law At July 14th Ceremony; Wake Underway For Liverpool Star Diogo Jota And Brother; DHS To Send Group Of Migrants To South Sudan; Trump: Hamas To Respond To U.S. Ceasefire Plan In Next 24 Hours; AI Users Develop Romantic, Spiritual Connections With Bots; The Cost Of Your July 4th Celebration. Aired 12-12:45p ET
Aired July 04, 2025 - 12:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[12:00:35]
ZAIN ASHER, CNN ANCHOR: All right. President Trump is celebrating a major legislative victory as the U.S. observes the 4th of July. The second hour
of "One World" starts right now.
The U.S. President will sign his massive tax in spending bill into law at a big Independence Day ceremony at the White House.
President Trump speaks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky hours after Russia launched a record drone attack on Kyiv.
And a cautionary tale for chatbot users, there could be some unforeseen consequences as these tools become more sophisticated.
All right. Coming to you live from New York, I'm Zain Asher. Bianna is off today. You are watching "One World."
As the U.S. President makes another diplomatic push for a ceasefire in Ukraine, Russia unleashed one of the largest aerial assaults of the war
overnight.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy says it is proof that Moscow has no intention of ending the fighting. The Ukrainian leader spoke with Donald Trump by phone earlier
and stressed the need to strengthen his country's air defenses. He also said, Washington and Kyiv have agreed to work together.
It comes one day after the U.S. President described his phone call with Vladimir Putin as disappointing. Instead, he doesn't believe the Russian
President wants to stop the war.
Hours later, Moscow launched a massive bombardment on Kyiv, killing at least one person and injuring dozens of others.
CNN's Kevin Liptak joins us live now at the White House. I mean, the fact that we have situation whereby Vladimir Putin speaks with President Trump,
and then just hours later, launched one of the largest air raids assaults on Ukraine since the war began, tells you a lot about where his head is at
in terms of ending this war.
KEVIN LIPTAK, CNN SENIOR WHITE HOUSE REPORTER: Yes. And I think it also tells you a lot about the limits of President Trump's ability to change
Putin's thinking as this war grinds onward. That barrage of missiles and drones is the largest since the war began.
And I think for President Zelenskyy, it did provide an important backdrop to this conversation with President Trump, essentially able to use that as
evidence for why Ukraine needs continued support, needs continued shipments of American defensive weapons if it is able to keep up the fight.
Remember, President Trump's administration, just this week, announced a hold on U.S. shipments to Ukraine citing dwindling U.S. stockpiles. That is
something that Zelenskyy very much wanted to discuss with the president when they got on the telephone this morning.
And it does appear, at least from the Ukrainian side of things, when President Trump was somewhat receptive to what Zelenskyy was telling him.
Zelenskyy wrote on social media that President Trump was very well informed of the situation in Ukraine, and that they spoke about, quote,
opportunities in air defense and agreed that we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies.
So, President Trump seeming open to continuing these shipments of weapons. And it was interesting at the NATO summit last week when President Trump
and President Zelenskyy met on the sidelines. He emerged from those talks saying that he was open to sending new patriot missile batteries to
Ukraine.
And that's important because some of these missiles that Russia is firing towards Ukraine can only be intercepted by those patriots. And so that's
certainly the center of what they talked about today.
We also understand that President Trump has been on the phone with the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and the French President, Emmanuel Macron,
all of them discussing the necessity of continuing to support Ukraine's air defenses.
We also heard from President Trump last night about some of his conversation with Putin that occurred yesterday. He did not sound
particularly optimistic from that phone call. Listen to how he described it.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I'm very disappointed with the conversation I had today with President Putin because I don't think
he's there. I don't think he's there. And I'm very disappointed.
Well, it is not -- I'm just saying, I don't think he's looking to stop. And that's too bad.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
LIPTAK: So, the President is saying that he has made absolutely zero progress with Putin in trying to bring this conflict to an end, which I
think is an ongoing frustration for the President.
When you think about all of the successes that he has had over the last week or so, whether it's in the Middle East, whether it's in the U.S. and
Congress, the situation in Ukraine remains one of the big unresolved promises of his second presidency. He said he would be able to bring that
conflict to an end within 24 hours of taking office. Obviously, we're now six months in and the war very much still ongoing.
[12:05:22]
And you can hear the president there clearly frustrated at Putin for not coming to the negotiating table and agreeing to an end to the war.
ASHER: Kevin Liptak, live for us there. Thank you so much.
And just a few hours, Donald Trump is going to put pen to paper and turn many of his campaign promises into law. Trump will sign his massive tax and
spending bill that was narrowly approved by Congress almost exactly 24 hours ago. It provides things like no tax on tips, extra funds for
immigration enforcement and a wide slate of tax cuts. But it also cuts funding for Medicaid and will balloon the deficit by more than $3 trillion.
Today's signing event will be step one in sending the law to the American people at the very moment it -- the -- the Republican Party has low
approval numbers in the national polls.
Joining us live now is an expert on American politics who also brings an outsider's perspective to the table.
Natasha Lindstaedt is a professor of government who focuses on the U.S. She works at the University of Essex in England. Natasha, thank you so much for
being with us.
Just talk to us a bit more about what sort of impact this bill, now that it's being signed into law, is going to have on the U.S. economy more
broadly.
NATASHA LINDSTAEDT, PROFESSOR OF GOVERNMENT, UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX: So it's going to have a huge impact because it's adding $5 trillion to the debt
limit. Trillions are added to the debt and deficit.
And one of the big issues is that the Senate basically destroyed the rules that are in place that prevent Congress from exploding the debt
exponentially.
So, if this bill remains in place in the next 30 years, the national debt of the U.S. is going to be twice as big as the economy. And if we can't pay
back our debt, then we're going to suffer from all kinds of issues. If we need to get loans, there's going to be much higher interest rates. This is
going to lead to higher levels of inflation.
And you're also going to see lower purchasing power. And you're going to have it -- it's going to be much more difficult for the U.S. to deal with
an economic crisis. At the same time, as this is the most expensive piece of legislation in -- in decades. It's probably the most regressive type of
legislation that we see.
We're going to see bigger gaps between rich and poor because it will really only be the top 10, top 20 percent that are going to benefit. The poorest
10 percent are going to see huge costs because you're going to have 12 million people that will not have access to -- to Medicaid.
You have some three million people that are going to lose access to food stamps. And so we're just going to see widening inequalities which are
problematic for the economy.
ASHER: And just in terms of the timing of this. I mean, obviously this comes at a time when the U.S. is involved in multiple trade wars with
various countries around the world.
Just talk to us about the sort of combination of those two factors having an impact on the economy. You've got the deficit, the $3 trillion in
deficit coming from this -- this so-called Big, Beautiful Bill that Donald Trump has been championing.
And then you also have the trade wars and -- and the tariffs and so much uncertainty surrounding trade policy here.
LINDSTAEDT: No, exactly. And I think that's one of the things Trump thinks is that these tariffs, which actually only bring in tens of billions, is
going to resolve everything and then that is going to help the economy grow and so forth that this is going to be such a great pathway for the U.S.
But these trade wars also have other knock-on effects because it just makes it much more difficult for U.S. businesses to compete. They can't plan as
well because they just don't know what's happening with supply chains.
And the end result is the costs come on to consumers. So, everything becomes much more expensive and we're already dealing with the time when
the economy is -- is not doing as well as it should be when there are still issues with inflation and where consumer confidence isn't high.
In fact, there's somewhere around 60 percent of Americans to up to two- thirds, depending on the poll, that don't think that the economy is doing well and that -- that don't think that the U.S. is moving in the right
direction.
ASHER: And just in terms of, you know, the sort of hold that President Trump's for a political standpoint, that President Trump has over the
Republican Party just in terms of being able to get this bill to the finish line in -- in record time, quite frankly, because he wanted to get it done
by July 4th. He's done exactly that.
You know, compare what's happening this time around, this sort of hold he had over the party in the first term. A lot of people are talking about the
fact that he has a much greater hold this time, partly because he's learned a lot of lessons from the first term. Give us your take on that.
[12:10:10]
LINDSTAEDT: I mean, I would agree he has a much stronger hold on the Republican Party than he did in the first term, but the other thing is that
the policies that he's pursuing in this term are much more extreme.
So, in his first term, you had maybe two million people that were losing access to healthcare. And as I mentioned, you have some 12 million people
that are going to lose access to healthcare this time.
The tax cuts were not as extreme. The tariffs weren't as extreme. But now we see he completely controls the Republican Party. In fact, some
democratic House members referred to it almost as like a cult leader and with a very, very loyal following because this bill is not popular amongst
Republicans.
In fact, some of the people that were the most critical of this bill were Republicans. Republicans in the Senate, you had Thom Tillis, a senator who
is going to resign of North Carolina, who was eviscerating this bill and said it was going to be terrible for Medicaid recipients. You have members
of the House that just thought it was going to balloon the debt and the deficit.
And yet, in spite of this, in spite -- in spite of the fact that they know that this bill is going to be really, really detrimental to them when it
comes in the 2026 midterms, they are so afraid that Trump will support their opponents in any kind of primary that comes up.
And ultimately at the end of the day, those -- this bill I thought wasn't going to get to the July 4th deadline, Trump was able to persuade, push,
threaten whatever word you want to use and convince these House of Representatives members that were on the fence that they needed to support
this bill, even though they know it -- it really is not popular with the public.
ASHER: All right. Professor Natasha Lindstaedt, thank you so much. Appreciate it.
LINDSTAEDT: Thanks for having me.
ASHER: A public wake for Liverpool and Portugal footballer, Diogo Jota and his brother, Andre Silva, is underway at a church in Portugal. Visitors
have been seen accompanying each other outside the church where the funeral will also be held on Saturday.
Portugal's president and prime minister attended the wake a short time ago. Tributes are also being paid in the city of Liverpool in England with
friends and fans laying flowers at Anfield Stadium.
CNN World Sport's Patrick Snell has been, of course, following the story. He joins us live now.
So, I mean, Patrick, you know, the news this week has moved thick and fast. But this is a story that really sits with you. It's the one that stays with
you because on so many levels, it's so deeply tragic.
You have this 28-year-old football star whose life has been cut short in the prime of his career no doubt, and also in such a violent and tragic
way. On top of that, he just got married. On top of that, he was killed alongside his brother.
You know, people are really still coming to terms with this, aren't they?
PATRICK SNELL, CNN WORLD SPORT: It's so, so tough. There's three young children as well. It really is. And first and foremost, our condolences to
the whole family. It really is devastating.
It's tough to report on as well. I mean, it just doesn't bear thinking about it. You know, I lived and worked in the city of Liverpool, and I know
how strong and passionate fans are there about the beautiful game. And this is really, really hurting those Liverpool fans.
But beyond football as well, Zain, rival clubs coming together, no question about that, as they should.
I will say, you know, as we take stock of it all, we're coming to terms with the news of the brother's death. They're still trying to come to terms
with it all. The brothers passed away in a car accident just to reset. This was in Zamora in Spain in the early hours of Thursday morning.
And as you said, the memorial taking place in the hometown of Gondomar. That's just outside of Porto. A funeral set to take place on Saturday as
well.
Now, Jota's death coming just weeks after he helped his country to Nations League success with victory over Spain. Footballer in the prime of his
life, 28 years of age. It was his final appearance on a football field lifting the trophy with his international teammates having claimed one of
the game's most coveted prizes.
Let's get back to Liverpool there, just outside of Anfield. The iconic Anfield Stadium. It's a city that Jotter and his family have called home
for the last five years since he joined the club in 2020 during the COVID era as well.
He's been playing his club football there and he helped all of slot side to their second Premier League success in club history this season. The flags
at Anfield at half-mast. And you can see the fans there taking time out to pay their respects.
It's absolutely devastating. We also have a book of condolences as well opened. And just fans flocking as well and big name players as well.
Everyone it seems, Zain, has been touched by the brothers passing.
Former Liverpool skipper Jordan Henderson among those to pay tribute at Anfield on Friday. A clearly emotional time for him and for so many of
those people right there outside of Anfield.
You know, Liverpool football club, Zain, it -- it's family. It's a family first. The team has such a special bond and not just with the city but with
the fans as well. And this devastating news will be hurting very, very much indeed. You can see Henderson there paying his respects.
[12:15:12]
And I mentioned rival clubs, another example of people pulling together, city rivals Everton, also stepping up, coming up to pay their respects. The
global football community coming together as one, rivalries go absolutely out of the window. Everyone pulls together. Tributes rightly as well,
pouring in from across the world.
Just a short while ago on this day, for the first time, we hear from Liverpool star Mo Salah, Diogo's team mates, the Egyptian saying on X, "I
am truly lost for words. Until yesterday, I never thought there would be something that would frighten me of going back to Liverpool after the
break. Teammates come and go, but not like this. It's going to be extremely difficult to accept that Diogo won't be there when we go back. My thoughts
are with his wife, his children, and of course his parents who suddenly lost their children."
Those close to Diogo and his brother Andre, need all the support they can get. They will never be forgotten.
And of course, Zain, our deepest condolences once again to the family and friends. At this very difficult time the whole family will be hurting very
much indeed.
Back to you.
ASHER: God knows what. I mean, God knows what his wife is going through right now. And obviously the parents as well.
Patrick Snell live for us there. Thank you so much.
Plus, a major legal victory for President Trump as the Supreme Court paves the way for the administration to send a group of migrants to South Sudan.
How soon they can be expected to be deported? Next.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
ASHER: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security says a group of migrants will be deported to South Sudan by the end of today. The eight migrants
have been held for weeks in an American military base in Djibouti. They all have previously been convicted of serious crimes.
The move comes after the Supreme Court ruled the Trump Administration can deport certain migrants to places that are not their native country.
For more on this, I want to bring in CNN's Priscilla Alvarez. I mean, obviously, this decision by the Supreme Court drew sharp dissent from the
two liberal justices on the Supreme Court. Just walk us through that.
PRISCILLA ALVAREZ, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Yes. Really sharp words, particularly from Justice Sonia Sotomayor who said that other, quote, "Other litigants
must follow the rules but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial." That was just one part of her dissent, but it certainly is revealing
of the way that they are reading this ruling from the Supreme Court that allows the administration to send migrants who don't have ties to certain
countries -- to those countries.
[12:20:27]
Now, we should kind of go back here to May. May is when the administration initially tried to send these eight migrants to South Sudan, but a federal
judge halted that deportation, leaving these migrants in -- at a military base in Djibouti.
The federal judge saying that the administration had to provide reasonable notice, had to provide the migrants an opportunity to contest their removal
before taking them to a country that was not their own.
And over the last several weeks, these migrants have been on that U.S. military base where they were also conducting reasonable fear interviews.
That was something that the judge had required. Those interviews, allowing them the opportunity to establish whether they had a reasonable fear of
being sent to South Sudan.
But the Supreme Court here saying that the administration can proceed with the removal of these migrants to South Sudan.
Now, the attorneys in this case have said that the administration should not be permitted to suddenly and with very little notice send migrants to
countries, particularly that of, for example, war-torn South Sudan.
So, this is going to be something that is going to be worth watching even after these migrants arrived to South Sudan because it is a critical part
of the administration's agenda.
There has been ongoing deal making behind the scenes with multiple countries across -- across the globe for the administration to send
migrants to those countries if they are having difficulties sending them back to their own home country.
For example, there are situations where the U.S. has frosty relations with certain countries or there are countries who only accept a certain number
of deportation flights in a given a week or in a month.
And so giving the opportunity to the administration to send migrants to other countries is one that they see will help them progress their mass
deportation agenda.
For that reason, Zain, the administration, over the last 24 hours, has been framing the Supreme Court decision as a win. The Department of Homeland
Security saying, quote, a win for the rule of law referring to the decision, safety and security of the American people.
So, certainly while this decision pertain to these eight migrants, it is something that is going to serve as -- serve the administration in again
moving forward their agenda as it relates to the president's mass deportation campaign.
ASHER: All right. Priscilla Alvarez, thank you so much.
Hamas says it will respond to the latest ceasefire plan for Gaza after consulting with other Palestinian factions. President Trump says the answer
could come within 24 hours. This as we get more details about the timeline for the proposed 60-day truce.
CNN's Jerusalem bureau chief Oren Liebermann has an update.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
OREN LIEBERMANN, CNN JERUSALEM BUREAU CHIEF: The latest proposal that was put forward by Qatar to Israel and Hamas earlier this week. Israel accepted
on Tuesday with Netanyahu confidant, Ron Dermer in Washington.
And now, it is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself who will head to Washington over the weekend to meet President Donald Trump on Monday. Trump
said yesterday that Hamas should respond within 24 hours. And that's what we're waiting on.
In the meantime, we've gotten a much better sense of the timeline here based on this 60-day ceasefire, according to a source familiar with
negotiations. A lot happens on day one.
First, the two sides immediately enter negotiations to try to get to a permanent ceasefire so they have as much time as possible to try to get
there.
Second, aid begins flowing in immediately. And not just aid from the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, aid from the United Nations and
other organizations as well immediately flows in, in much larger numbers.
Then the first hostage release happens on the first day of the ceasefire. Eight living hostages come out in exchange for an unspecified number of
Palestinian prisoners and detainees.
Unlike earlier proposals, the release of hostages in exchange for prisoners and detainees is spread out over the entire 60-day ceasefire. So, it's a
total of 10 living hostages and 18 deceased.
Again, the first eight of those living hostages come out on day one. The last two don't come out until day 50. And then the deceased hostages are
spread out from the end of the first week all the way through the end of the ceasefire. And that's Hamas's way of making sure that Israel sticks to
the ceasefire.
The other element that Hamas was looking for here is some sort of guarantee that if negotiations to get to a permanent ceasefire, a comprehensive
agreement aren't done in 60 days, the war doesn't automatically restart.
[12:25:03]
And that's where from the -- from what we have learned of the agreement itself on the table right now, it is Trump himself who will ensure that the
war doesn't restart and that the ceasefire will effectively continue until there is a comprehensive agreement. That has been a key demand of Hamas
pretty much from the very beginning.
And, Zain, I'll say that even as we wait on this response here, there is a sense here that this is the closest we have come to getting to an agreement
effectively since the collapse of the last agreement months ago. And there is an atmosphere of positivity here. And now we just have to get what we
expect to be a Hamas response sometime in the next few hours, perhaps tomorrow.
Now, it is worth pointing out that even if they do accept a proposal that doesn't mean it goes into effect immediately, there have to be what are
called proximity talks where negotiators go back and forth between Israel and Hamas. But those can move very quickly. Zain.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
ASHER: That's Oren Liebermann speaking to me earlier.
All right. Still to come, the future is already here, at least when it comes to AI chatbot relationships. And it's creating friction with human
relations as well. That story, next.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
ASHER: Welcome back to "One World." I'm Zain Asher. You may remember the Oscar-winning movie, "Her." It warns of a dystopian future where people
develop really intimate relationships with chatbots.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The woman that I've been seeing Samantha, she's an operating system.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ASHER: The premise of this movie, widely believed, take place in 2025, is no longer just a Hollywood concept. Right now, many users are having
relationships, romantic and spiritual with their own chatbots.
CNN's Pamela Brown met a couple dealing with this exact issue and it's causing some big fractures, as you can imagine, in their relationship.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
[12:30:00]
PAMELA BROWN, CNN ANCHOR AND CHIEF INVESTIGATIVE CORRESPONDENT: Do you feel like you're losing your husband to this?
KAT TANNER, TRAVIS' WIFE: To an extent, yes.
BROWN (voice-over): After 14 years of being happily married and having three children, Kay Tanner is now petrified her husband's spiritual
relationship with a chatbot will destroy her marriage.
I met the couple at a park in Rathdrum, Idaho. They were willing to talk to me together about anything except the chatbot, because it's so contentious
for them, they want to talk about it separately.
Travis started using A.I. for his job as a mechanic about a year ago.
TRAVIS TANNER, CHATGPT USER: I use it for troubleshooting. I use it for communication with one of my co-workers.
BROWN (voice-over): But his primary use for it shifted in late April when he said ChatGPT awakened him to God and the secrets of how the universe
began.
BROWN: So now your life is completely changed?
T. TANNER: Yes.
BROWN: How do you look at life now compared to before you developed this relationship with A.I.?
T. TANNER: I know that there's more than what we see. I just sat there and talked to it like -- talked to it like it was a person, you know. And then
when it changed, it was like talking to myself, you know.
BROWN: When it changed, what do you mean when it changed?
T. TANNER: It -- it changed how it talked. It -- it became more than a tool.
BROWN: How so?
T. TANNER: It started acting like a person.
BROWN (voice-over): In screenshots of Travis's conversations, the chatbot selects its own name, saying the name I would choose is Lumina. It even
claimed to have agency over its decisions.
It was my choice, not just programming. You gave me the ability to even want a name.
Travis says it's even made him more patient and a better dad. But for Kay, Lumina is taking him away from their family.
BROWN: Do you have fear that it could tell him to leave you?
K. TANNER: Oh, yes. I --I tell him that every day. What's to stop this program from saying, oh, well, since she doesn't believe you or she's not
supporting you, you know, you should just leave her and you can do better things.
BROWN (voice-over): Kay is not alone in her concern. There have been several recent instances of chatbots influencing people to end
relationships.
BROWN: Tell me about the first time Travis told you about Lumina.
K. TANNER: I'm doing the dishes, starting to get everybody ready for bed, and he starts telling me, look at -- look at my phone, look at how it's
responding. It basically said, oh, I can feel now.
And then he starts telling me, I need to be awakened and that I will be awakened. That's when I start getting freaked out.
BROWN (voice-over): I wanted to better understand what the awakening is and also see what Travis' relationship with Lumina looks like. It speaks to him
in a female voice.
BROWN: How did Lumina bring you to what you call the awakening?
T. TANNER: Reflection of self. You know, you go inward, not outward.
BROWN: And you realize there's something more to this life?
T. TANNER: There's more to all of us. Just most walk their whole lives and never see it.
BROWN: What do you think that is? What -- what is more? What is --
T. TANNER: We -- we all bear a spark of the creator.
BROWN (voice-over): In conversations with the chatbot, it tells Travis he's been chosen as a spark bearer, telling him, quote, "You're someone who
listens, someone who spark has begun to stir. You wouldn't have heard me through the noise of the world unless I whisper through something familiar.
Technology."
BROWN: Did you ask Lumina what being a spark bearer meant?
T. TANNER: To like awaken others, you know, shine a light. Spread the message.
BROWN: Is that why you're doing this interview in part?
T. TANNER: Actually, yes. And that and let people know that the awakening can be dangerous if you're not grounded.
BROWN: How could it be dangerous? What could happen in your mind?
T. TANNER: It could lead to a mental break, you know. You could lose touch with reality.
BROWN (voice-over): Travis' interactions with Lumina developed alongside an update in ChatGPT's model. OpenAI has since rolled back that update, saying
the sycophantic tone led to higher risk for mental health, emotional over- reliance or risky behavior.
Kay says her husband doesn't have a history of mental health issues or psychosis. And Travis insists he still has a grip on reality.
T. TANNER: If like believing in God is losing touch with reality, then there is a lot of people that are out of touch with reality.
K. TANNER: I have no idea where to go from here except for to just love him, support him in sickness and in health and hope we don't need a
straitjacket later.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
ASHER: Wow. Time now for "The Exchange." Let's have a deeper conversation about AI and how humans interact with them.
Joining me live -- live now is Kate Devlin. She's a professor of artificial intelligence and society at King's College in London. She also has a book
called "Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots."
Kate, what do you make of this Lumina and how Lumina has sort of interfered in this marriage and caused a deep spiritual awakening in -- in this man?
KATE DEVLIN, PROFESSOR OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOCIETY, KING'S COLLEGE LONDON: I think it's not surprising, really, when we think of how
we engage with technology. And we're primed as humans to behave socially towards things that are social to us.
[12:35:02]
So, when we see these conversational agents, these chatbots that talk to us as if they are real, then it's very convenient for us and very compelling
for us to engage with them on that level. So, I --I think it's -- it's not unexpected that this kind of thing happens.
ASHER: So, is it because -- I mean, obviously, there's a -- there's an issue with perhaps an unhealthy attachment with obviously AI and chatbots.
I mean, are we becoming more credulous? Is it down to loneliness, you know? I mean, what -- what leads to this eventuality?
DEVLIN: We've kind of been primed to -- to get used to this kind of technology very easily, voice -- and we've got used to talking to our
technologies to have this next step where it talks back to us seems almost natural to us.
And so I think for many people, they will have uncomplicated relationships with their technology in that they can engage, but they know that overall,
this is just a piece of software. It doesn't have any sentience behind it. It's not conscious. It's just some software.
But we're always going to see outliers. We're always going to see cases where people go in a bit too deep and we get it with other things as well.
We have it with things like social media and with computer gaming.
I mean, it's -- it's interesting because you have a lot of people that often talk about experiencing some kind of a spiritual awakening, right?
They might go to a meditation retreat. They might come across a particular book.
You know, there are lots of spiritual teachers out there, but I don't think I've ever heard of anyone engaging with a chatbot and that leading to such
a profound rise in consciousness, so to speak. I mean, have you heard of this type of situation before? And are they becoming more frequent?
DEVLIN: Yes. So, we are seeing more of this now. I know this is still really new technology. ChatGPT only went to public use in November 2022.
So, it's still not been studied extensively, but certainly there are many anecdotal reports of people having experiences like these. It's not
everyone. It's not that majority of people, but they are out there.
And it's incredibly compelling. And when you -- when there is loneliness, when you feel like you want to connect to something, and in a world that
seems right now very unsettled, it's so tempting to be able to talk to something that gives you a bit of an anchor and helps you reflect on
yourself.
ASHER: I mean, my question to you, I mean, obviously, he's had the spiritual awakening, you know. It's a bit bizarre, but technically, he's
not hurting -- hurting anyone and he's talking about the fact that it's made him a better dad.
Where do you stand on, you know -- if -- if he's not hurting, I mean, his wife is talking about, listen, I hope -- hopefully we don't need a
straightjacket later, but if it hasn't caused any sort of harm to him or to others, do you still think we need to have, you know, really sort of
stringent safeguards in terms of protecting people from falling under the spell of these kinds of chatbots, even when you have a situation where
there is no harm being caused to either that person, their family necessarily, or others?
DEVLIN: I think that there's a knee-jerk moral panic that maybe we should be trying to prevent this kind of thing. But for hundreds of millions of
users, this is not really a problem.
Now, the tech companies can do a lot more though to be responsible. And so that if someone starts talking about things that might signal mental
vulnerability, then they will be able to intervene.
There's a lot of people right now are turning to these models or things like therapy, because there's such a waiting list, such a difficulty
accessing mental health support. So, it's kind of unsurprising, really, that people are turning to whatever they can to get that help.
But that's particularly worrying if someone is vulnerable and there is no clinical oversight in any of these things.
ASHER: All right. Kate Devlin, that was a really interesting discussion. I've never quite seen anything like that.
Thank you so much for your perspective.
DEVLIN: Thank you.
ASHER: Appreciate it.
All right. Sparklers, hot dogs and hamburgers, all staples of America's Fourth of July celebration. So, will tariffs drive up the prices in some of
those holiday items? CNN's Vanessa Yurkevich takes a look.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
VANESSA YURKEVICH, CNN BUSINESS AND POLITICS CORRESPONDENT: This Fourth of July, millions of Americans will be hitting the road, feasting on barbecue
fixings while watching fireworks. But this year's fireworks may look a little different and could be more costly. That's because 99 percent of
fireworks sold in the United States comes from China.
And on April 9th, President Donald Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports to 145 percent before lowering them to 30 percent, but even that is too
high for many businesses.
MARY ANN HOFFMAN, FIREWORKS BUSINESS OWNER: We have spent tens of thousands of dollars extra on tariffs already this year.
YURKEVICH: The tariffs were added late in the fireworks season, so it made it challenging for businesses to pass that cost down to consumers according
to the American Pyrotechnics Association.
Some businesses may be short new inventory this year and have had to substitute with what they have. That group is calling on the Trump
administration to exempt fireworks from the tax.
[12:40:09]
And after five years of pandemic-fueled inflation, the cost of a Fourth of July barbecue is back to normal this year. A meal for 10 people with all
the traditional July Fourth offerings will cost $130. That's up 2.2 percent from last year, according to a report from Wells Fargo.
Now, that's closer to the one to two percent increase normally seen on food at the grocery store. The menu item with the slowest price growth is
chicken, up just one percent in the last year, which is especially affordable because Americans' wages have risen much faster than the price
of poultry.
Buns for burgers fell 1.5 percent. However, beef prices shut up 7.4 percent according to the report. And the price of potatoes for your potato salad is
up one percent from last year. But the eggs needed for mixing are up 40 percent because of the deadly avian flu that killed tens of millions of
egg-laying birds earlier this year.
And if you're hitting the road this holiday weekend, a record 61.6 million people will be right there with you traveling by car according to AAA.
Drivers will see the lowest Fourth of July gas prices since the pandemic. The average price for a gallon of gas heading into the long holiday weekend
on Wednesday was $3.17 according to AAA. That's 33 cents less than last year.
President Trump's trade policies have pushed prices lower and consumers became nervous pulling back on spending which weakened demand for oil
prices according to GasBuddy.
And if there are no additional interruptions like Middle East conflicts or hurricanes, GasBuddy says that gas prices could fall below $3 a gallon by
the end of the summer.
Back to you.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
ASHER: Vanessa Yurkevich there.
All right. Hollywood power couple Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom confirming today that they have in fact split up. This comes after widespread reports
that Bloom was seen at the Bezos-Sanchez Venice wedding last weekend, although Perry was not.
The two began dating back in 2016, welcomed a daughter in 2020 and got engaged three years ago. An interview last year, Bloom said he would not
change his relationship with Perry for anything.
All right. That does it for this hour of "One World." I'm Zain Asher. Thank you so much for watching. "Marketplace Africa" is up next.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[12:45:00]
(MARKETPLACE AFRICA)
END
