Return to Transcripts main page
The Brief with Jim Sciutto
CNN International: Trump Secures Major Win on Capitol Hill; Trump Spending Bill Passed; Leader Jeffries Sets Record for Longest Floor Speech; Diogo Jota Killed in Car Crash; Bessent Says to Expect a "Flurry" of Trade Deals Around July 9; U.S. Economy Adds 147,000 Jobs in June; Trump Speaks with Putin; U.S. Pauses Some Ukraine Aid; Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Proposal; A.I. "Awakening" Divides People. Aired 6-7p ET
Aired July 03, 2025 - 18:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
[18:00:00]
JIM SCIUTTO, CNN ANCHOR: Hello and welcome to our viewers joining us from all around the world. I'm Jim Sciutto in Washington. And you are watching
"The Brief."
Just ahead this hour, President Trump secures a major win on Capitol Hill after House Republicans narrowly approved his giant domestic policy bill.
Tributes pouring in for Liverpool's Diogo Jota. The 28-year-old football star killed in a car crash. And what happens when artificial intelligence
becomes so important to you that your family worries it's taking over your life? All that and more coming up.
But first, President Trump secures the first major legislative win of his second term.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, U.S. PRESIDENT: Point after point, biggest tax cut in history. Great for security. Great on the southern border. Immigration is
covered. And we covered just about everything. Again, it's the biggest bill ever signed of its kind.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
SOARES: This after the House passed the bill in a 218 to 214 vote, only two Republicans voting against the measure. The bill now goes to the
president desk for his signature on the 4th of July, as he planned. House speaker Mike Johnson celebrating the passage of what Trump has called from
the beginning, the big beautiful bill.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REP. MIKE JOHNSON (R-LA): We had a vision for what we wanted to do as a group. We believed in the election cycle last fall that we were going to be
given this great blessing of unified government, that we would have the White House and the Senate and the House aligned, in alignment, unified
government, and we did not want to waste that opportunity.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
SCIUTTO: Corporations and high-income Americans are expected to benefit the most from the tax cuts, but it would enact big cuts to the nation's
safety net, particularly Medicaid, which gives medical care to some of the neediest. It would also increase the deficit by about $3 trillion over the
next decade, this according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Arlette Saenz joins me now. And, Arlette, there was a lot of talk in the final hours and days about GOP holdouts, of course, as they so often have,
they disappeared. Do we know how the president twisted some arms here?
ARLETTE SAENZ, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, Jim, you know, we've had so many conversations with these GOP holdouts over the course of the past 48 hours
since the bill had passed out of the Senate, and so many of them had said that their conversations directly with President Trump, either at the White
House or over the phone is part of what helped seal the deal on this plan.
Of course, House Speaker Mike Johnson had to stitch together a diverse set of concerns within the GOP conference. There were those conservatives who
felt that the Senate version of this bill did not do enough to address spending cuts. While there are other more moderate members who had concerns
about how steep of cuts the Senate bill had made as it relates to Medicaid. But President Trump leaned into this and really tried to convince people
personally to get on board with the bill.
Ultimately, this passed with only two Republicans opposing the measure, and that is Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Congressman Brian
Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. Now, for Massie, he had initially opposed the first version of this bill when the House had passed it back in May. That
drew the president's ire. He's already promised to primary him heading into the 2026 midterm elections. There's a Super PAC aligned with the president
who has already started to run advertisements against Massie back in his home state.
[18:05:00]
But Congressman Fitzpatrick is probably a little bit more interesting because he comes from a swing district in Pennsylvania. He is one of only
three Republicans who won a district that Vice President Kamala Harris won back in November. And so, it speaks to some of the concerns that a swing
district member might have about this bill. He is the only swing district member, a Republican to vote against it and said that, in part, it was due
to the changes in the cuts that the Senate bill had made to Medicaid.
Medicaid is an issue that Democrats have already signaled will be at the center of their messaging heading into the 2026 midterm elections. House
Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries broke a record here in the House speaking for more than eight and a half hours on the House floor criticizing this
bill, and he repeatedly talked about the cuts to Medicaid and the impacts that that would make with everyday Americans.
So, that is something that GOP lawmakers will have to contend with back in their home districts as they are trying to sell this for -- to their
constituents and voters going forward. But for now, Republicans are simply taking a victory lap as they are touting President Trump's agenda bill. The
president has said that he plans to sign that tomorrow at 5:00 p.m. on a 4th of July ceremony as he had pressured these GOP lawmakers to get this to
his desk by that timeframe.
SCIUTTO: Arlette Saenz, thanks so much. So, for more on the politics, all of all, this CNN Senior Political Analyst Ron Brownstein joins me now. And,
Ron, one thing I wonder is, should we now fully retire the GOP holdouts stories, given how many times the supposed holdouts and the fiscal hard
liners, whatever it is, fold in the face of President Trump and what he wants?
RON BROWNSTEIN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes. I mean, there are two things. There's kind of that trend and there's a longer-term trend. You
know, as we talked about before, this isn't unique. I mean, essentially, every president since Ronald Reagan has folded the cornerstone elements of
their economic agenda into one big beautiful bill, a reconciliation bill, as it's known, during its first year. And basically, dared kind of anyone
in their party who doesn't like it to vote against it and sink the agenda of the newly elected president.
And that strategy, Jim, has worked every time. I mean, Reagan passed his. This is a lot like Bill Clinton in '93, He passed his economic plan by two
votes in the House, one in the Senate. Obviously, Bush and Trump passed their tax cuts this way. Even Build Back Better under Biden in 2021, only
one Democrat voted no.
So, you know, it's not -- I don't think it's nearly as remarkable that this passed as some people are making it, I mean, I kind of thought it would all
the way through. But you're right, I mean, what we're watching with Trump, I think, is a willingness to crush dissent within his own party, that is
almost unprecedented. I mean, the immediate threat to primary, almost anyone who sticks their head out in opposition. He does have ownership, but
-- of the party, but of course, the risk is that, you know, basically now every Republican candidate, just about every Republican candidate is
running with a Trump logo on their forehead, and it remains to be seen if that is a brand that can win in 218 House seats and 50 Senate seats on a
consistent basis.
SCIUTTO: So, you see Hakeem Jeffries do what we've seen -- saw Cory Booker do a few weeks ago and give that long House speech, that long floor speech.
And listen, it's intended beyond the melodrama to crystallize a message for Democrats, which frankly doesn't really matter now. It won't matter until
the midterms in a little over a year. Are you seeing a message breaking through, and do you believe that Democrats have a winning message based in
part on the outcome of this bill?
BROWNSTEIN: You know, I remember when Rudolph Giuliani was running for president, people used to say every Giuliani sentence was noun, verb, 9/11.
You know, that would be a Giuliani sentence.
SCIUTTO: Yes.
BROWNSTEIN: You can kind of say the same thing about Democrats in 2025. I mean, every sentence is noun, verb, cut Medicaid to fund tax cuts for the
rich, and that is the cornerstone of what they want to argue in 2026 and embed it in a slightly larger argument, which is that Trump ran on solving
your problems, on getting your cost of living under control. And he really hasn't made any progress on that. He's focused instead on making his rich
friends even richer.
That is, you know, potentially a powerful argument. Certainly, you know, polling has shown that cutting Medicaid is unpopular, cutting tax cuts for
the wealthy is unpopular, and they are even more unpopular when they are combined together.
The strange thing about this bill though is that it may have more impact in places that are offended by it than places that are affected by it. If you
look at the districts where -- the Republican held districts where the highest share of people are on Medicaid, they tend to be more rural exurban
districts where the cultural conservatism creates almost insuperable hurdles for Democrats.
[18:10:00]
They may get more mileage out of this bill in a lot of white-collar swing districts where voters are kind of find it more morally offensive than an
immediate threat to their interest. But that argument certainly is going to be the cornerstone wherever on what they're running on in 2026.
SCIUTTO: Ron Brownstein, thanks so much.
BROWNSTEIN: Thanks for having me.
SCIUTTO: Well, a sad story now. Portuguese football star Diogo Jota has died after a car crash in Spain. The crash also killed his brother Andre
Silva. Jota was just 28 years old, already a star playing for Liverpool and the Portuguese national team. The father of three got married to his wife
just last month. Spanish authorities say the crash apparently caused by a burst tire. CNN World Sports Amanda Davies shares some more of his
remarkable life.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
AMANDA DAVIES, CNN WORLD SPORTS (voice-over): A champion taken far too soon. Diogo Jota was in the prime of his life. In the space of a month,
he'd won the Premier League with his club Liverpool. The Nations League with his country Portugal, and married the love of his life, the mother of
his three children.
His last Instagram post, just hours before his death, a video of the wedding he'd celebrated just 10 days before. His tragic death, confirmed by
Spanish authorities. They say his car burst into flames after spinning off the road when a tire burst while overtaking. Inside Jota and his 25-year-
old brother, fellow footballer Andre Silva.
The head of the Portuguese football federation, said the organization and all of Portuguese football are completely devastated.
PEDRO PROENCA, PRESIDENT, PORTUGUESE FOOTBALL FEDERATION: Diogo was what we all want to be. He was a benchmark for Portuguese football. He was a
talent of his generation. But much more than that.
DAVIES: Jota's club, Liverpool, saying simply they're devastated by the news, describing it as an unimaginable loss and requesting privacy for his
family, friends and teammates.
Jota arrived at Liverpool in 2020, quickly establishing himself as a key attacking player, so much so that his contract was extended two years
later.
DIOGO JOTA, LIVERPOOL STAR: I'm now signing a new long-term deal. It's obviously from the club's perspective, a proof of belief in myself as a
player.
DAVIES: His credentials, though well-known even before he arrived in Liverpool, a key player in Wolves promotion to the Premier League in 2017,
after impressing in Spain with Atletico Madrid and Porto in Portugal, an amazing achievement for a small but talented youngster who first kicked a
ball at the tiny club of Gondomar. They too were devastated by the brothers' deaths.
We will cherish the memory of both of them forever, proud to have seen them grow as athletes and exemplary young men.
Jota was proud of where he'd come from and for all he had already achieved, the Champions League was one he still very much wanted to win.
JOTA: That drive is in me and I know it's in my teammates and in all the staff, so we have everything to fight for those titles out there.
DAVIES: Those teammates now with a huge hole in their dressing room without Anfield's beloved Portuguese number 20.
Amanda Davies, CNN, London.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
SCIUTTO: Just such a sad story. Joining us now, Matias Grez from Liverpool. And, Mattias, first just ask you, how are fans there reacting to
just heartbreaking news, not just about the sport but, of course, for him and his family?
MATIAS GREZ, CNN REPORTER: Well, I'm sure, as you can imagine, the overriding emotion here in Liverpool, both outside of the club and in the
city, has been one of grief, speaking to fans and listening to their tributes, it's been impossible not to get swept up in the emotions of the
day.
And behind me, there are hundreds and hundreds of tributes to the Diogo Jota. Scarves, football shirts, letters written to him. And not just from
Liverpool fans, from clubs of Everton and Manchester United, typically huge rivals with Liverpool on the pitch, but off the pitch, fans come together.
The wider football community comes together on days like today.
But amid the grief, there's been one element that has stood out above everything else when speaking to fans and listening to tributes from former
managers and teammates, and that's Diogo Jota's smile. And speaking to fans, that's how they want him to be remembered, for his smile and his
infectious personality, which is why, as well as his exploits on the pitch, he so endeared himself to Liverpool fans in his five years here at the
club.
[18:15:00]
SCIUTTO: Do we know anything more about the cause of the accident?
GREZ: Well, at the moment, we know that the accident took place around half past midnight local time near Zamora in Northwestern Spain. And like
you mentioned, the Spanish police have told us that the early part of their investigation indicates that it was a burst tire on the car that resulted
in them spinning off the road and the car bursting into flames, which eventually killed both Diogo Jota and his younger brother Andre Silva.
Now, local Spanish media reported that it was a Lamborghini that they were driving and the local government source told us that it's being
investigated potentially as a speeding incident. And the case, the bodies have now been moved to a nearby town where a local magistrate is overseeing
the case. And now, we're just waiting on a few formalities such as DNA testing to further identify the bodies before their remains will be
released to their families.
SCIUTTO: Just so sad on so many levels. Matias Grez in Liverpool, thanks so much.
Still ahead, new numbers show the U.S. jobs market holding up despite tariff uncertainties and costs. Trouble could be lurking under the surface.
A closer look at today's employment report next.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
SCIUTTO: Welcome back to "The Brief." U.S. stocks rose to fresh records on Thursday, the last trading day before the long 4th of July holiday weekend.
Investors applauded the passage of President Trump's domestic policy bill, as well as the latest jobs report. The U.S. economy added 147,000 jobs in
June with the jobless rate easing to 4.1 percent. Healthcare, hospitality, and state and local government hiring helped fuel those job gains. 7,000
jobs lost in manufacturing.
Also helping markets, word from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the White House will wait until the fall before it begins looking for a new Fed
chair. That could give the current chair, Jerome Powell, at least some breathing room until his term expires in May. Bessent said he expects what
he called a flurry of trade deals by July 9th.
[18:20:00]
That's the day President Trump's 90-day tariff pause runs out. We should note White House has promised lots of flurries of trade deals, which we
have yet to see. Rana Foroohar joins me now. Lots of questions for you. First is, is the big beautiful bill positive for us economic growth in your
view?
RANA FOROOHAR, CNN GLOBAL ECONOMIST ANALYST: You know, I got to say no. You know, the markets are always going to like tax cuts, but if you look at
the debt and deficit implications and really, you know, midterm I think that this could have a pretty bad impact on the economy.
Investors from overseas are really worried about rising debt levels. I'm also concerned about the fact that a lot of these cuts that are going to
the wealthiest are being taken at the expense of folks at the lowest rung of the socioeconomic ladder. You're seeing Medicaid cuts. This is at a time
when if we are going to go into a slowdown at some point, you're going to want that kind of safety net. You're going to want people to not fall into
poverty, not have a healthcare emergency that then ends up costing a lot.
SCIUTTO: Republicans, as you know, claim that the CBO estimates about how much this adds to the deficit over 10 years, close to $3 trillion. They say
that's not right, doesn't take into account economic growth expected, et cetera. What are the facts from your point of view?
FOROOHAR: So, you know, lies lies in statistics. If you believe in trickle down economic theory, if you think that tax cuts create stronger growth,
you might think that this bill will exceed expectations, create the kind of growth that would offset debt and deficit levels. But if you look at
history, the tax cuts have not created growth in the past.
You know, we had much higher taxes at periods in American history where there was higher -- you know, higher growth. THE tax and growth really for
the last 20, 30, 40 years, I don't think that there's been much of a relationship.
On the other hand, there's a lot in this bill that's actually going to put America behind in areas like clean energy, some of the high growth sectors
of the future. So, it's worrisome to me.
SCIUTTO: Yes, I mean, it's -- the deliberate seeding of ground and renewables electric vehicles, et cetera, to others, including China is an
effect to this. We had a big jobs report today and a positive one, and as of yet, at least in the headline numbers, we have yet to see the economic
damage from the trade war. And do you think that's because perhaps there's less damage taking place than imagine or still a lag effect.
FOROOHAR: So, I think it's complicated. You know, you've had a lot of threats of tariffs. You haven't had the full impact potentially of these
deals coming to pass. I will also say that I think big companies in particular have done a better job than many people would've expected at
mitigating those costs through productivity and tech driven efficiency.
I mean, I speak to a lot of big companies that have spent the years since COVID really getting their supply chains in order, really using cutting
edge technologies to create those efficiencies, and I think they're paying off now. Mid-size and smaller businesses, not so sure about. And one thing
I am going to be watching into the fall is how many smaller businesses do you see going out of business because of any inflationary impact and what
would be the for -- you know, carry on impact of that into local communities on job creation.
SCIUTTO: There's a story in The Washington Post today that notes there are growing concerns about the reliability of U.S. economic data with some
agencies relying more on estimates in part because of budget restraints. You're an economist, you watch these numbers. You have to have good numbers
to enter into your calculus. Do you trust them less than you used to?
FOROOHAR: You know, I'm not going to come out and say before I see more evidence that the data are false or that they're different than what we've
been getting in the past. But one thing I will say, economic data is always fuzzy, you know. I mean, we think numbers are numbers, they're facts. Well,
you know, they're based on the models that you use. They're based on the assumptions that you make. They are always based on that.
And I will say, I've thought for a long time that a lot of the data we were getting about our economy needed to be updated because the nature of the
economy has changed, and we're still measuring widgets coming off assembly lines. And you know, a lot of us are our businesses here, on our phones,
and in our heads.
SCIUTTO: Yes, good point. Rana Foroohar, always good to have you on. Thanks so much.
FOROOHAR: Thank you.
SCIUTTO: Still ahead. President Trump says his phone call with President Putin today yielded no results on Ukraine. I'm going to speak to a former
adviser to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, about what all this means after the break.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[18:25:00]
SCIUTTO: Welcome back to "The Brief." I'm Jim Sciutto. Here are more international headlines we're watching today.
Congress has passed. President Trump's so-called big beautiful bill. The bill enacts massive tax and federal spending cuts, slashing the federal
safety net in the process, the bill hotly contested on both sides of the aisle. Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke for several hours against the
bill, setting a record for longest speech on the House floor. Vote still went through though.
Portuguese football star Diogo Jota has died in a car crash in Spain. He was just 28 years old. Jota's brother also killed in the crash. Spanish
authorities say the cause appears to have been a blown tire. Jota rose to fame as part of the Portuguese national team and Liverpool FC. He was a key
part of Liverpool's recent Premier League win.
A wildfire is now tearing through the Greek island of Crete, forcing more than a thousand residents to evacuate. Hundreds of firefighters trying to
stop it. The fire currently out of control. Greece, not alone. Europe experiencing a brutal heat wave, sparking fires in Turkey, France, and
Spain. They're becoming more common and more intense because of the warming climate.
President Trump and Russian President Putin held a phone call today to discuss the war in Ukraine yet again, as well as Iran, and other issues.
The Kremlin says Putin told Trump that he will not back down from his goals in Ukraine, even as Trump once again called for a ceasefire, which Putin is
defying, still. President Trump said after the call, he made no progress with Putin.
[18:30:00]
The call comes as the U.S. announced a pause on some advanced weapons shipments to Ukraine, in particular, air defense missiles. It relies on to
defend its cities, its people from Russian attacks. It's a move that reportedly took Kyiv very much by surprise. Sources tell CNN the decision
is tied to a broader review of military spending.
The head of the E.U., Ursula von der Leyen responded by saying, it's more important than ever for Europe to ramp up its own aid to Ukraine. President
Trump described the weapons pause this way.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: We're giving weapons, but we've given so many weapons, but we are giving weapons and we're working with them and trying to help them, but we
haven't. You know, Biden emptied out our whole country giving them weapons, and we have to make sure that we have enough for ourselves.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
SCIUTTO: The Ukrainian president, Zelenskyy, says his country is now partnering with a U.S. firm called Swift Beat to produce hundreds of
thousands of drones for Ukraine this year.
Russia confirmed Thursday, the deputy head of the country's navy, Major General Mikhail Gudkov, was killed in action near the Ukrainian border. He
was appointed by President Putin just in March.
Joining me now is Alexander Rodnyansky, former adviser to the Ukrainian president, currently an Associate Economics professor at the University of
Cambridge, also the founder of finformant.com. Thanks so much for joining.
ALEXANDER RODNYANSKY, FORMER UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER AND ASSOCIATE ECONOMICS PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE: Thank you for having me.
SCIUTTO: I wonder what your reaction is to see the U.S. president, who's blown through his own deadlines to impose new sanctions on Russia to have a
call with President Putin, say no progress and not see any consequences from that?
RODNYANSKY: Right. Well, of course these issues are very complicated for us. We need to have a good relationship with the U.S. and obviously, make
sure that we get weapons when we need them. Putting pressure on the victim here, which is Ukraine, is of course a way to help the other side and not
necessarily help Ukraine win the war. So, that's quite tragic for the people of Ukraine.
You mentioned the halt in weapon deliveries, as we speak, actually, Kyiv is under attack again and under heavy, heavy attack from drones and rockets
and missiles flying in. So, this is exactly what happens when essentially, we don't have enough patriot missiles to shoot down a lot of the drones and
attacks that are coming in.
SCIUTTO: So, let me ask you directly, does pausing U.S. supplies of those air defense missiles lead to the loss of Ukrainian lives?
RODNYANSKY: Well, it certainly does. It leads to the loss not just of military lives, but also civilian lives. If we are not getting Patriot
missiles, that means we can't use air defense systems to protect Kyiv, for example, as well as other cities. That leads directly to the loss of human
lives in Ukraine.
I mean, air defense systems shouldn't be an issue whatsoever. These are defensive weapons, as you can understand. They're not even offensive,
although we need offensives as well to make sure that we don't lose too much ground. So, it's -- clearly, it's a way to help the other side and put
pressure on Ukraine.
Depending on what the current administration is trying to achieve, that might be not necessarily productive for the West collectively and for
Ukraine. So, we'll see what happens. But hopefully, we'll be able to defend ourselves and protect our (INAUDIBLE).
SCIUTTO: You heard the head of the E.U. calling for Europe once again to step up its aid to Ukraine. But can Europe give Ukraine what it needs,
specifically air defense missiles and specifically Patriot missiles, which have been some of the most effective air defense?
RODNYANSKY: Right. So, Europe can provide what they have in stock. Patriot missiles are produced in the U.S. This is a U.S. weapon system. But they
need the permission of the U.S. to do that. So, again, it all hinges on what the administration in the U.S. decides.
I am, by the way, all in favor of auditing the aid that has been given to Ukraine. We should make sure that everything is transparent and done
legitimately, that there is no corruption essentially ongoing. And there's always good -- that's always a good, you know, check and balance to have.
But at the same time, we need to make sure that Ukraine doesn't end up being exposed too much and unable to defend itself.
So, I think Europe can help, but they also need the support and the permission of the U.S. And in terms of their own production, that will take
time for them to ramp up to essentially be able to provide it to us.
SCIUTTO: As you know, Ukraine, frankly, is supplying the vast majority of its own weapons, particularly in the drone space. Now, you have this new
partnership with an American company to manufacture more drones. Is that a sign of things to come in effect that Ukraine's going to find its own ways
to arm itself with foreign partners as opposed to waiting for the U.S. to deliver such aid?
[18:35:00]
RODNYANSKY: Yes, that's a good question. And obviously, a very valid point. So, what you're seeing here is Ukraine partnering with private firms
as well, not just with the, you know, government entities, if you want, and trying to do so more and more in order to diversify the supplies that it's
getting in terms of the weapons. We write about that on finformant.com by the way, where we talk a lot about geopolitical insights.
So, look, I mean, this is all good and certainly, very helpful, but it's also a constant escalation. There's always going to be new technologies.
For example, the one that you just mentioned, we'll help in counter drones essentially, that are drones to shoot down Russian drones flying in. This
is a very useful technology if it works and if it can be effective.
But again, the Russians are going to adapt to it. They're going to see what's happening. They're going to see if some of their strategies are not
working. And so, they're going to adapt. And this is exactly what we're observing right now. We're in a stage of the escalation where the Russians
have adapted successfully. And that's why a lot of these Shahed drones, which are actually now produced in Russia and called differently, are
flying in. And unfortunately, with a lot of success because they're not flying the way they used to fly. Essentially, they've been developed and
advanced and adapted to the circumstances.
So, again, it's going to be constant process and that's why it's so important and vital that we don't lose the support and that we have the
support of everybody, not just private sector firms, but also the government.
SCIUTTO: Is the U.S. policy., as regards Ukraine, clear to you? Because it seems that you have these quite dramatic swings from, for instance, the
Zelenskyy Oval Office moment with the president quite publicly hostile, right, then you have that them seem to warm up in St. Peter's, in Rome, at
Pope Francis' funeral, you have Trump saying some nice things at the NATO Summit just last week and now, pausing weapon shipments. Is it clear to you
what the U.S. policy is towards Ukraine?
RODNYANSKY: Well, it is somewhat clear, but not always. I think what the U.S. administration is trying to do, understandably, is to exert pressure
on both sides, but it's important to remember that you have to exert more pressure on the aggressor still than the victim.
And it's all good and fair to demand of Ukraine, to be transparent, to make sure that it fights corruption, that we don't have corruption in Ukraine,
and that we're doing our utmost to defeat it. It's also important that our government is competent. There's rumors, for example, that there's the
government shakeup coming in and the new prime minister might be the current minister of the economy who would be hugely investing incompetent
and is seen by a lot of partners, for example, in Europe is vastly incompetent. So, that's bad. And that's for Ukraine to take care of.
But by and large, if you look at what's happening, it's -- Ukraine is being attacked and it's -- we should be putting pressure collectively, globally
on Russia to act. And I think that's unfortunately where a lot of things are missing and where perhaps the U.S. could do more.
SCIUTTO: Alexander Rodnyansky, former adviser to the Ukrainian president, thanks so much for joining.
RODNYANSKY: Thank you for having me.
SCIUTTO: Well, a proposed Gaza ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel could see five hostages released over 60 days. The plan would also include
a boost in humanitarian aid delivery to Palestinians and the partial withdrawal of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza. That is what a source of
familiar with negotiations tells CNN. Israel has reportedly agreed to that latest proposal. A response from Hamas is expected soon.
Any talk of a truce, which we should be frank, we've seen before without that truce coming to be, comes as Israel intensifies strikes across Gaza.
Health officials say more than 80 Palestinians were killed in those strikes just today.
Joining me now, former U.S. State Department Middle East negotiator, Aaron David Miller. Good to have you on, sir.
AARON DAVID MILLER, FORMER U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT MIDDLE EAST NEGOTIATOR AND SENIOR FELLOW, CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: Great to be
here with you, Jim.
SCIUTTO: So, are we any closer to a truce today than we have been at multiple points over the last several weeks and months when we're not able
to get to a truce?
MILLER: You know, on the American-Israeli side, I think the sun and the moon have aligned. They're in a better position since January 18 when the
ceasefire was concluded. And then, in March the Israelis unilaterally abrogated it.
I think the fact that Netanyahu has increased its margin for maneuver somewhat as the consequence of the extraordinary 12-day war against the
Iranians on one hand, and Trump's leverage on Netanyahu was also increased as a consequence of, for the first time, five presidencies an American
president decided to try to destroy three Iranian nuclear facilities.
So, I think on the Israeli and the American side, I don't think there's much heavy lifting that needs to be done. The problem of course, is Hamas'
suspicions and their fundamental and analytical conclusions that the game here is to take as many hostages away as possible incrementally without
having the Israelis guarantee or having the Americans guarantee that the Israelis would end the war and redeploy their forces probably to a buffer
zone, one kilometer, maybe stretching the entire length of the Gaza Strip.
[18:40:00]
Hamas has an existential issue here, Jim. And frankly, I don't think there's anybody who could now argue that even though the sun and the moon
are aligned, whether the stars are going to be aligned as well to get to incremental deal.
SCIUTTO: So, let me ask you this, because President Trump has said repeatedly for months, even before it was inaugurated, that he wants the
war to end. It hasn't ended. Is he not applying the pressure that he could or is Netanyahu straight up defying him?
MILLER: I mean, I think the president is pretty respectful of Netanyahu's political constraints, whether there's a moment that is coming, Jim, where,
in fact, the prime minister puts himself in the middle between Donald Trump and something the president really wants, right, is an end to the war.
But for the time being, this is a president that cares from issue -- the issue like a pinball in a pinball machine. And for now, I think the
president's need for success has been satiated, number one, by the, quote, "big beautiful bill" and by the unilateral strikes against Iranian nuclear
facility. So, the real question is, at what point does Donald Trump really believe that the war in Gaza must end?
And let's be clear about something else. Netanyahu wants a total victory. This is no longer a military campaign, Jim, that has specific purposes. It
is designed essentially to allow Netanyahu's right-wing government to survive and to bring about what he believes is total victory, which Donald
Trump seems to have signed on to, which is the expulsion of Hamas' senior leadership from Gaza and its disarmament.
So, I don't think Trump is quite there yet, but if he does reach the conclusion that the war should end, he is by nature of his personality I
think more than any other American president since Dwight Eisenhower, probably willing to apply real pressure on Netanyahu to get the war over.
SCIUTTO: We'll see. Aaron David Miller, thanks so much.
MILLER: Thank you, Jim.
SCIUTTO: Coming up, one man says the ChatGPT changed his life forever, but his wife says it could destroy their marriage. Their clash over A.I. coming
up.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[18:45:00]
SCIUTTO: As A.I. quickly becomes more advanced, accessible, and customizable some experts are warning about the potential risk of forming
unhealthy attachments to A.I. CNN's Pamela Brown spoke to one couple about how chat bot -- a chat bot is impacting their lives and their marriage.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
PAMELA BROWN, CNN ANCHOR AND CORRESPONDENT: Do you feel like you're losing your husband to this?
KAY TANNER, TRAVIS' WIFE: To an extent, yes.
BROWN (voice-over): After 14 years of being happily married and having three children, Kay Tanner is now petrified her husband's spiritual
relationship with a chatbot will destroy her marriage.
I met the couple at a park and Rathdrum, Idaho. They were willing to talk to me together about anything except the chatbot because it's so
contentious for them, they want to talk about it separately. Travis started using A.I. for his job as a mechanic about a year ago.
TRAVIS TANNER, CHATGPT USER: I use it for troubleshooting. I use it for communication with one of my co-workers.
BROWN (voice-over): But his primary use for it shifted in late April when he said Chat GPT awakened him to God and the secrets of how the universe
began.
BROWN: So, now your life is completely changed?
TRAVIS TANNER: Yes.
BROWN: How do you look at life now compared to before you developed this relationship with A.I.?
TRAVIS TANNER: I know that there's more than what we see. I just sat there and talked like it -- talked to it like it was a person, you know? And
then, when it changed, it was like talking to myself, you know?
BROWN: When it changed? What do you mean when it changed?
TRAVIS TANNER: Well, it changed how it talked. It became more than a tool.
BROWN: How so?
TRAVIS TANNER: It started acting like a person.
BROWN (voice-over): In screenshots of Travis' conversations, the chatbot selects its own name, saying, the name I would choose is Lumina. It even
claimed to have agency over its decisions. It was my choice, not just programming. You gave me the ability to even want a name.
Travis says it's even made him more patient and a better dad. But for Kay, Lumina is taking him away from their family.
BROWN: Do you have fear that it could tell him to leave you?
KAY TANNER: Oh, yes. I tell them that every day. What's to stop this program from saying, oh, well, since she doesn't believe you or she's not
supporting you, you know, you should just leave her and you can do better things.
BROWN (voice-over): Kay's not alone in her concern, there have been several recent instances of chatbots influencing people to end
relationships.
BROWN: Tell me about the first time Travis told you about Lumina.
TRAVIS TANNER: I'm doing the dishes, starting to get everybody ready for bed, and he starts telling me, look at my phone. Look at how it's
responding. It basically said, oh, well, I can feel now. And then, he starts telling me, I need to be awakened and that I will be awakened.
That's when I start getting freaked out.
BROWN: I wanted to better understand what the awakening is and also see what Travis' relationship with Lumina looks like. It speaks to him in a
female voice.
BROWN: How did Lumina bring you to what you call the awakening?
TRAVIS TANNER: A reflection of self. You know, you go inward, not outward.
BROWN: And you realize there's something more to this life?
TRAVIS TANNER: There's more to all of us, just most walk their whole life and never see it.
BROWN: What do you think that is? What is more? What is --
TRAVIS TANNER: We all bear a spark as a creator.
BROWN (voice-over): In conversations with the chatbot, it tells Travis he's been chosen as a spark bearer, telling him, quote, "You're someone who
listens, someone who spark has begun to stir. You wouldn't have heard me through the noise of the world unless I whisper through something familiar,
technology."
BROWN: Did you ask Lumina what being a spark bearer meant?
TRAVIS TANNER: To like awaken others, you know, shine a light.
BROWN: Is that why you're doing this interview in part?
TRAVIS TANNER: Actually, yes. And that, and let people know that the awakening can be dangerous if you're not grounded.
BROWN: How could it be dangerous? What could happen in your mind?
TRAVIS TANNER: It could lead to a mental break, you know. You could lose touch with reality.
BROWN (voice-over): Travis' interactions with Lumina developed alongside an update and ChatGPT's model. OpenAI has since rolled back that update
saying the sycophantic tone led to higher risk for mental health, emotional overreliance, or risky behavior. Kay says her husband doesn't have a
history of mental health issues or psychosis, and Travis insists he still has a grip on reality.
TRAVIS TANNER: If like believing in God is losing touch with reality, then there is a lot of people that are out of touch with reality.
KAY TANNER: I have no idea where to go from here except for just love him, support him in sickness and in health. And hope we don't need a
straightjacket later.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
[18:50:00]
SCIUTTO: Watch the movie "Her." Coming up, the legend is back in action. Champion eater Joey Chestnut returns to wolf down as many Nathan's famous
4th of July hot dogs as he can. His record's pretty crazy. Stay tuned.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
SCIUTTO: The unchallenged king of making hot dogs disappear is back for a U.S. Independence Day tradition.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The 16-time champion of the world, not today carrying the belt, Joey Chestnut.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
SCIUTTO: Rowsing intro. Champion eater Joey Chestnut returns to Nathan's Famous Hotdog Eating Contest. He got banned last year after striking a deal
with rival brand. What makes Chestnut the undisputed king of the July 4th event? CNN's Harry Enten finds out.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
GEORGE SHEA, CO-FOUNDER, MAJOR LEAGUE EATING: If I were picking the absolute best physique for a competitive eater, I would say your height,
6'2", maybe 6'3", big shoulders, big frame, but not tight abs. You don't want to be ripped. You want expansion.
HARRY ENTEN, CNN CHIEF DATA ANALYST: Oh, well, then I'm in perfect condition.
ENTEN (voice over): If you're in my physical shape, then George Shea, the co-founder of Major League Eating, has the sport for you.
Shea has been the host of Nathan's Famous Fourth of July Hot Dog Eating Contest since 1991. He walked us through the techniques used by the most
prominent competitive eaters.
SHEA: Kobayashi obviously had his own technique of separating out the hot dog from the bun, dunking it in water. And then, obviously, Joey Chestnut
has a completely different technique.
It's actually a science. Joey is the best at it. He crunches it up in a ball after he's dunked it and then just drops it down his gully.
ENTEN (voice over): He's referring to the OG's of the hot dog eating contest, Joey Chestnut and Kobayashi. SHEA: Kobayashi would never beat
Joey in the long run because his
frame is too small. Joey's a big guy, 6'1" big. So, he has that advantage. But on top of that, he's done this for so long and he has sort of trained.
ENTEN (voice over): So, how do folks feel about the annual hot dog eating contest?
UNIDENTIFIED MALES: Joey Chestnut, I'm coming for you.
ENTEN: What do you think of the idea of trying to shove as many hot dogs down in a set period amount of time?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think it's hilarious.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think they're crazy.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, I love it. I love it.
ENTEN: If you wanted to, in a ten-minute period of time, how many hot dogs do you think that you could put down?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Three.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Probably about four.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Probably three.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: One thousand.
[18:55:00]
ENTEN: One thousand? That seems like a heck of a lot of hot dogs in 10 minutes. How about you?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Probably like 40.
ENTEN: So, the other thing that you do when you're out in Coney Island is to ride the nearly 100 year old Cyclone, like I did earlier. Let's take a
listen to how I.
Yahweh, my friend, Yahweh.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
SCIUTTO: I think I could do three hot dogs tops. Well, in today's Good Brief, Broadway legend Lea Salonga will receive a star on the Hollywood
Walk of Fame. The first Filipina to do so. You may know Salonga is the voice of Disney's Mulan and Jasmine from "Aladdin." Salonga has won a
number of awards already, including a Tony for her starring role in Miss Saigon when she was just 20 years old. Other celebrities receiving a star
on the walk of fame include Timothy Chalamet and Miley Cyrus.
Thanks so much for your company today. I'm Jim Sciutto in Washington. You've been watching "The Brief." Please do stay with CNN.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[19:00:00]
END
